Advertisement - Members don't see this ad
Putting a vote on you did cross my mind after I posted that because it sketches me out that there are people calling you sketchy but no one is actually putting a vote there. I'd rather put my vote on a wolf read though, and you're hanging around in neutrals.Not all reaction tests involve being openly sketchy and seeing who picks up on it. For example this is a great setup:
If you feel like people keep mentioning person A as sketchy, but not voting there, put your own vote there and see what happens. Do those people join you? If they do, then did they do it in a way that pings your wolfdar or did they do it in a villagery way? If they don't, is it because they logically reconsidered their stance on person A, or did they not vote because they are a wolf and just wanted to throw out a fake/easy read to look like they were generating discussion.
the difference between someone doing something sketchy and then using reaction tests as a defense, and an actual test is that the person has a follow up thought process and analysis, not just touting that its a test.
I'm trying to figure out why me saying multiple times that I'm concerned about Sporty's inactivity/lack of contribution then feeling less concerned after she caught up and I like her analysis is somehow buddying up.She’s also seems to be buddying up with/defending Sporty, which sunny pointed out earlier. This whole thing felt weird AF.