D
drkingdingaling
I can not BELIEVE you chose UCSF over Johns Hopkins. HOPKINS is one of the best, If not the best medical school in all of the world (Second to Harvard and Harvard only). Nothing against UCSF but you screwed up....BIGTIME
Originally posted by drkingdingaling
I can not BELIEVE you chose UCSF over Johns Hopkins. HOPKINS is one of the best, If not the best medical school in all of the world (Second to Harvard and Harvard only). Nothing against UCSF but you screwed up....BIGTIME
Originally posted by drkingdingaling
I can not BELIEVE you chose UCSF over Johns Hopkins. HOPKINS is one of the best, If not the best medical school in all of the world (Second to Harvard and Harvard only). Nothing against UCSF but you screwed up....BIGTIME
Originally posted by mgmd
heheh -ur phony - um i mean funny...
Originally posted by drkingdingaling
Not purposely I just think its prettty stupid/borderline mildly ******ed to pass up the worlds greatest medical institution just because you think you wont make friends.
Thats just gay.
\Originally posted by GoodMonkey
you're an idiot.
and besides, what does sexual preference for the same gender have to do with it? or being overly joyous either, for that matter?
(i HATE the use of "that's gay" as a derogatory comment meant to indicate something is stupid.)
Originally posted by ERMudPhud
If you go to any of them and suck then as my PD put it, "Despite what they think, their worst graduates don't walk on water"
Originally posted by citygirl
That's enough, kids. Let this thread die. The OP has made his/her choice and would have been happy either way.
Originally posted by ERMudPhud
"I guarantee you that PD's have a higher view of Hopkins grads than UCSF grads..."
Source? Proof? Some sort of survey of the nations program director?
Originally posted by mgmd
depends what you mean by superior - I'm not ready to close any doors, it seems to me that UCSF's match list is more diverse, with an obvious bias towards CA.
It's a subjective qualification - for someone who feels that Hopkins is the best place to do your residency then Hopkins is obviously the better place to go to med school
but based on my selective stats if someone wants to go to Brig+Women's, to Mayo, or to Mass Gen, they could easily conclude that UCSF would offer them a better chance at getting in.
Hopkins happens to only allow its students to do 6 weeks of rotations away from school and UCSF allows its students 3,5 months - that's really important for me because I want to get a good sense of what's out there.
I brought up the issue because in comparison to Hopkins, UCSF has no other academic medical center where patients might be treated. It's just a fact that there is no competition for patients.
The comparison to Philly is inappropriate because it's a much larger city that needs more hospitals. SF is larger than Baltimore by about 150 000 people and has a single medical school that has three very different sites of delivery for patient care - the county, the VA, and the tertiary care center. That's a definite bonus for medical training - I'm not sure how you can coherently argue with that.
Hey - you win, there are more poor people in E Baltimore. Which always kind of disturbed me when I thought about it - the best medical center in the country can be found in one of the worst neighborhoods in the country, one with the highest rates of syphilis, gonorrhea, and low birth weight children (all preventable illnesses)- am I only one who sees something wrong with that picture?
Originally posted by MacGyver
http://www.usnews.com/usnews/edu/grad/rankings/med/premium/main/mdrrank.php
Assessment score by residency directors (1-5, 5 = highest)
Harvard 4.7
Hopkins 4.7
Duke 4.5
WashU 4.5
Stanford 4.4
UCSF 4.4
Originally posted by ERMudPhud
Someday MacGyver you will put down your nearly worn out copy of US News and pick up a statistics textbook. Comparison of means without some measure of variance (standard deviation, p value etc) is meaningless.
Furthermore, if you would read the fine print on your smudged and filthy copy of US News you would see that surveys were sent to a"representative sample" of PD's and the response rate from PD's was down around 30%. In other words, over 2/3's of those surveyed thought the whole exercise was so stupid that they didn't even bother to send the survey back. So, all you can really say is that a (potentially biased)minority of an undefined subset of residency directors had a small (and not clearly statistically significant) preference for JHU over UCSF. Probably not something to make life changing decisions over.(clinical or otherwise)
Originally posted by MacGyver
Yeah you must be right.
I'm sure PDs view University of Puerto Rico grads in the same light as Harvard