WhtsThFrequency said:
I don't think dpcdoc meant it is an "awful" practice as in a "wrong" or "bad" practice....I think he meant that it would make him feel awful, and that it would feel wrong, simply doing that ALL DAY. I think a lot of us would have a tough emotional time if that was our job, to drive around to people's houses constantly putting animals down. Euthanasia is not just a cruse and it is not just blessing - it is both. You're toeing the edge of Godwins' law of SDN 😉
If I ever evoke Godwin's Law, there will be no doubt. In this instance I do not need to evoke inflammatory, exaggerated or fallacious statements, let alone having to resort to mention of Adolf and his boys.
...
aww, damn...
Actually, it is neither a blessing or a curse and quite amoral until you introduce the human element. Not that there is anything wrong with being morally or ethically conflicted with the concept of euthanasia. They are emotional, they are rough, they do drain you; some will even take a little piece of you with them.
However, I felt compelled to point out if one views it as a negative instead of looking at it as a positive and valuable tool the collective experience of the profession before you says clinical practice is not for you. You will burn out. You will suffer from compassion fatigue. Faster than those who hold it in favorable regard, anyways.
If the OP meant as you suggest, then I am in error and stand corrected. I did not interpret it as such for a simple reason. Starting up a mobile euthanasia only practice is a
voluntary choice. Wouldn't you agree people who feel it would be too emotionally tough or made them feel awful or felt wrong to do multiple euthanasias a day would elect not to do so in the first place?
I have killed animals "all day". I saw the need and the value in the service and do not regret it. It is an awesome responsibility and one I do not take lightly. If the day ever comes where the ability to humanely euthanize is legislated out of my hands, I will be looking for a new career the next.