- Joined
- Oct 19, 2015
- Messages
- 30
- Reaction score
- 6
This isn't THAT important of a question lol, but I'm curious. I've finished my first 6 EK 30-minute exams from a few of the books. As a non-traditional student really worried about my content prep, I've been pleasantly surprised by my results up to this point (~19-21/23 usually).
They provide their "scaled" scores, which I don't put a lot of stock in, and obviously there is a built-in advantage of just reading the content then having passages that only test THAT content. But I'm curious for those of you that have taken them and also taken the actual MCAT, how comparable do you feel the passages are?
Do you feel that doing decently on the 30-min exams is a good indicator of preparation on that material?
They provide their "scaled" scores, which I don't put a lot of stock in, and obviously there is a built-in advantage of just reading the content then having passages that only test THAT content. But I'm curious for those of you that have taken them and also taken the actual MCAT, how comparable do you feel the passages are?
Do you feel that doing decently on the 30-min exams is a good indicator of preparation on that material?