A lot of doctors will be earning significantly less than that $200k, as that averages in older docs and not all med school grads get to be high paying specialists. And not all families are dual income. In much of the country, a lower six digit income is still enough to have a decent house in the suburbs (with a sizeable mortgage), pay your bills, send your kids to nice schools, go on nice, but not extravagant vacations, and maybe if you are frugal even have a small bit left over to save/ invest. Which is what I would term comfortable. That is not enough to own a Ferrari, Bentley, mansion, jet airplane or some of the other things described in these pre-allo threads, however. So I stand by the comfortable, but not living large statement.
Well, you can't say that unless you know the income distribution and the standard deviation around the $200k. Just saying that 'not all doctors are going to be specialists and this includes older doctors' doesn't mean much otherwise.
If the case is that a few doctors are pulling the income level to $200k, then one should stress the
median income when talking about how 'nonextravagant' physician income is, rather than saying $200k. By saying that the average income of a physician is about $200k, to me, that implies that the majority will fall into that range, I wouldn't assume that many are statistical outliers (as you are implying in your post).
When I was a computer science student back in the heydays of the dotcom boom, everyone was telling me that most students came out offers of ~$50k
average and most programmers makes ~$70k (salary). That average was pretty consistent in that
most students ended up in that range. There were those that were slightly below and those that were way above. Adjusted for living expenses, it came out a wash. As a result, when I hear an income average touted about, I assume that the middle majority is within a small range of that number. That's why I was curious as to why people think that $200k is only 'comfortable', b/c assuming that $50% of doctors make within that range (let's say standard deviation ~$20k), that still means a majority of people live more than 'comfortable' in my book.
My parents' combined income do not approach $140k, and I find that we are living quite comfortably and my parents do not have the accumulated wealth that others their age has (since they came to this country at the age of 36). Anyone above my parents' income, I consider more than comfy. That's why I would disagree that a $200k income is only 'comfortable'. Where I live, $180k gets you in the top 5%
household income bracket. And according to stats I've read, the top 5% household income is a bit less than $200k nationwide. Since a slight majority households do have two earners, to me, having a job that pays, on average, $200k is pretty high.
And honestly, I have not see that many students bragging about buying jets or whatnot. I think most students have a pretty grounded view of how much a doctor makes, judging by the poll (although it is skewed a bit higher than the statistical average). Sure, some are optimistic with their $500k, but that's a small minority. When I was in college, there was a small segment of the computer science population that thought they could make $100k coming out, but most people knew that was hogwash. I think we're seeing the same here. I knew back when I was a CS student that I was coming out making ~$50k and that was in the range I expected (and this was right AFTER the dotcom bust). From my research, the $200k is about right and I expect to make somewhere below that range ('cause I'm a below average med student
), and I'm assuming that my SO will probably work as well, so that's still pretty nice salary in my book. I know it's a cardinal sin to say this on the forum, but I think a doctor's salary would make me very happy. It's the workloads that's gonna kill me.