Hysterectomy question

Started by Zarniwoop
This forum made possible through the generous support of SDN members, donors, and sponsors. Thank you.
Get help with your application

Use all the free resources available to you from SDN: articles, guides, expert advising, forums discussions, and school research.

309 not justified for h/o CIN1

But any uterus resected for benign disease with opportunistic salpingectomies which is happening more and more attached to uterus (not separate parts) - 307 is certainly justified
 
309 not justified for h/o CIN1

But any uterus resected for benign disease with opportunistic salpingectomies which is happening more and more attached to uterus (not separate parts) - 307 is certainly justified
I also don't think it is justified, but how can you prove that APS's guidance is in the wrong?
Are insurance companies rejecting the 309 code?