IM subspecialty choice

This forum made possible through the generous support of SDN members, donors, and sponsors. Thank you.

baleine

Full Member
10+ Year Member
15+ Year Member
Joined
Jan 10, 2008
Messages
12
Reaction score
0
Points
0
  1. Medical Student
Advertisement - Members don't see this ad
I'm curious if you all have any thoughts about how to choose a specialty within IM, e.g. characteristics that would make one more or less likely to enjoy a particular field. I've pretty much got the picture that GI and cards are the people who like to do procedures and make lots of money, but I'm interested in more nuanced points about personality fit as well as thoughts about the other specialties (of particular interest--heme/onc, endocrine, rheum).
 
This is a simple straightforward question that has one answer:

Go into the field which you enjoy the most! Lifestyle is important but you HAVE to be happy. With more exposure you will learn a lot about the personalities that go into each field, but there are so many exceptions to those personality trends. Within any field you can go uber-academic/research, private private, little of each, full-time/part-time etc... Just stick with the field you like the most even if you do not fit the proto-type. Good luck and keep an open mind.:luck:
 
This is a simple straightforward question that has one answer:

Go into the field which you enjoy the most! Lifestyle is important but you HAVE to be happy. With more exposure you will learn a lot about the personalities that go into each field, but there are so many exceptions to those personality trends. Within any field you can go uber-academic/research, private private, little of each, full-time/part-time etc... Just stick with the field you like the most even if you do not fit the proto-type. Good luck and keep an open mind.:luck:

Fair enough, but my question lies in the fact that I don't know which specialty is the best fit for me. As a med student, and even next year as an intern, I don't have as much exposure as I would like to each specialty, and the pros and cons of each one according to personality type. I was late to the IM decision because I finally figured out something everybody else already knew--that I really just wanted to discuss and discuss and discuss some more about my patients, and that's what medicine is all about! In the same way that I didn't realize that this was such a big part of what matters in IM, I'm wondering if there are things about each specialty that are similarly unique fits for certain personalities.
 
I'll bite. There is a "subspecialty stereotype" thread floating around here that would be fun for you to look at...but here are my thoughts about traits you might be looking for:

Heme/Onc: Optimism. Love of medicine on the molecular level -- not the macro level. The good ones have good/great communication skills. Mix of inpatient/outpatient...with more satisfaction found in clinic.

Endo: Like general medicine and looking at the "big picture". Like the clinic. Comfortable with uncertainty.

Rheum: Also like general medicine and looking at the patient in entirety. Love to discuss the rheumatologic possibilities of (often) nonspecific symptoms. Also comfortable with uncertainty.
 
I'm curious if you all have any thoughts about how to choose a specialty within IM, e.g. characteristics that would make one more or less likely to enjoy a particular field. I've pretty much got the picture that GI and cards are the people who like to do procedures and make lots of money, but I'm interested in more nuanced points about personality fit as well as thoughts about the other specialties (of particular interest--heme/onc, endocrine, rheum).

Heme/Onc - Hate long term follow-up. In 5 years they're either "cured" or dead. Either way they're either the PCP's or the pathologist's problem, not yours.

Endo - How much do you love following A1c's and teaching surgeons how to write orders for insulin drips?

Rheum - You can carry a single prescription pad, preprinted w/ "Prednisone __mg PO daily x __ days" and just fill in the blanks.

Clearly, I'm joking here...kind of.

FWIW, I'm going into Onc and I like the challenges posed by the molecular basis of the diseases (I'm a researcher at heart) and the rapid pace of development in treatment options.

There's obviously more to Endo than managing sugars but, unless you do an outpt Endo rotation you'll never discover this as the vast majority of the inpt work (which is what most med students and residents get exposed to) is managing "brittle diabetics." Neurosurgery and Ortho define these patients as anyone w/ a CBG >100 on admission.

Rheumatology is actually progressing nearly as quickly as Oncology wrt molecularly targeted therapies these days. In general, once an internist tries steroids and they don't work, Rheum swoops in and saves the day w/ some sort of DMARD or molecular therapy. Or they act like oncologists do w/ the hopeless cases/non-responders and do symptomatic support/treatment.

Cards and GI are the surgeons of IM, they hate getting consulted, yell at you when you call and generally belittle your knowledge base and your mother's virtue when they answer your page. And then they do their magic and the patients love them.
 
No mention of Pulm/CC yet . . . it's an interest of mine, any thoughts on personality?

It's more procedurely inclined than the others mentioned, with bronchs, central lines, intubations, etc. I guess I'd say the personalities vary based on how much time in the ICU they're doing vs. outpatient pulmonology, so it could have a wide range.
 
Top Bottom