iPad :D

This forum made possible through the generous support of SDN members, donors, and sponsors. Thank you.
Advertisement - Members don't see this ad
Initial reaction was very underwhelming, and after thinking about it I had to decide against it. I already have a kindle, and I can't see myself using it to do anything other than for what I already use my kindle for. I'm not lazy to the point that I can't go on my laptop to surf the internet and on the go my android phone is more than enough. The main detractor was the fact that it has an active screen, so the screen flickers at roughly 60Hz, while the Kindle is an inactive screen with a much higher DPI, therefore less strain on your eyes. So for now I will stick with my kindle, this device was extremely underwhelming. Nothing more than a larger iPhone.
 
For someone who already has a macbook and an iphone the ipad is essentially useless. For a female, the name alone....well you get the idea. :smack:
 
I doubt the bookstore will do them any good. If people are willing to spend at least $499 to read e-books then why wouldn't they just buy a Kindle 2 for $200 less? Even Apple has to fail sometime, and I think this is it.
I guarantee you the bookstore will. They did the same with music and movies. Other, (arguably more practical), services existed with a similar function to that of iTunes Music Store, but it managed to move itself into the front of the digital music purchasing market.

The question is, and will be answered definitively by the iPad, is whether the existing technology linked to the music store (ipods + iphones) drove the dependency on the store or if the store drove sales of the devices, or a mixture of both. I want to see where this thing goes with such a crappy little device attached to it.
 
I wouldn't be able to use that for text books how can one do problems and stuff with something like that where you have to flip back and forth
 
I keep waiting for someone to make a witty iTampon joke...
 
08ipad.jpg

IDC-Foresees-iPad-in-2010-Calls-the-Prediction-a-No-Brainer-2.jpg

Id like to have one, but not for the price.
 
Last edited:
Call me a fuddy-duddy, but I like my med books in paper form (plus not all good med books are in electronic form to begin with); my cellphones with black and white screens with only a phone, text messages, calculator, cronometer and alarm clock (I've never used a cellphone with a camera yet, don't know how to use one) and my mp3 players simple and tiny with no flashy color screens and not costing several hundreds of dollars so if I have it stolen, I won't weep for 5 weeks.

Some doctors I know use palms and that's pretty much the most advanced piece of medical technology that fits in their pocket they will ever use (the only reason I'd ever buy a palm would be to have an electronic version of a vademecum or a thompson). Will this huge, easy to lose and over priced artifact with a female hygiene product as it's brand name ever replace my two hands, a cronometer and a pinard to know that the baby inside of a pregnant woman is still alive? No? Then I don't need it for my job. I'll only be worried sick of losing it at my job.

Heck, I don't own an iPhone or a Blackberry or an iPod. I don't see the point in ever owning any of those things.
Wasn't necessarily referring to textbooks, but other books that people read for pleasure... unless textbooks are your thing, lol You may not be their target market then, but people who ARE into e-readers would be. The question isn't whether or not an e-book market can survive, but whether apple can get a large enough piece and have it drive their iPad sales.


I heard they're making a workout version of the iPad that's slimmer and and less "bulky" the iPon.

...lol
 
"Holding the internet in your hand..."

I thought the name was fake until I saw that it was part of apple.com

My god, I didn't think they would actually try to sell this. I'm sticking with my Ipod Touch.
 
Advertisement - Members don't see this ad
I

The ridiculous thing here is to see whether their digital "bookstore" (which is sure to quickly become quite expansive) is enough to drive sales of an otherwise unimpressive and stupid device.

i dont understand how a computer with a regular screen expects to compete with e-readers with those special screens (i forget what its called, but you know, how it isn't backlit.) honestly i was kind of planning to just get a really nice sony reader, like the kind you can take notes on. theoretically i could DL all my textbooks AND notes AND journals on it AND take my own notes on it . . . plus, without the internet i won't be tempted to facebook during lecture . . . I already have one of those tiny HP's for the internet. what else do i need?

edited to add: even if you did want one, isnt it generally better NOT to get the first generation of a new device?
 
i dont understand how a computer with a regular screen expects to compete with e-readers with those special screens (i forget what its called, but you know, how it isn't backlit.) honestly i was kind of planning to just get a really nice sony reader, like the kind you can take notes on. theoretically i could DL all my textbooks AND notes AND journals on it AND take my own notes on it . . . plus, without the internet i won't be tempted to facebook during lecture . . . I already have one of those tiny HP's for the internet. what else do i need?

Yeah, I was thinking about this too. I think it's called eInk, and I've never really used it so I don't know much about it. This is what people mean by active vs inactive screen, though.
 
i dont understand how a computer with a regular screen expects to compete with e-readers with those special screens (i forget what its called, but you know, how it isn't backlit.) honestly i was kind of planning to just get a really nice sony reader, like the kind you can take notes on. theoretically i could DL all my textbooks AND notes AND journals on it AND take my own notes on it . . . plus, without the internet i won't be tempted to facebook during lecture . . . I already have one of those tiny HP's for the internet. what else do i need?

edited to add: even if you did want one, isnt it generally better NOT to get the first generation of a new device?

Technically... There's always early adopters though and an update usually isn't addressed until 6 months - 1 year unless needed. I was excited for a tablet computer, but I guess Apple saw something in the eBook market. Why not go with the HP Slate???

http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/06/the-hp-slate/

Apple couldn't do iSlate for those wishing this name since HP beat them to the punch this time. At least this thing is an actual computer AND it runs Windows 7.
 
Yeah, I was thinking about this too. I think it's called eInk, and I've never really used it so I don't know much about it. This is what people mean by active vs inactive screen, though.

they used to have them on display at borders- i am sure they still do. if you havent seen one up close and personal, you should. it's amazing. the only reason i haven't bought one yet is because i a) wanted to wait til they got cheaper and better, and b)wanted to wait until i got into medical school. now that both of those things have happened (yay!) i am going to look into it and make sure my textbooks are available in that format and that i can take notes on it. if i can, then that is definitely what i am going with.

i've just always been more into books than computers anyway so i feel like i gotta stay true to my bookworm self 🙂 plus i already have a laptop (pc) and a desktop (mac) so i don't really even want another computer. yet.
 
they used to have them on display at borders- i am sure they still do. if you havent seen one up close and personal, you should. it's amazing. the only reason i haven't bought one yet is because i a) wanted to wait til they got cheaper and better, and b)wanted to wait until i got into medical school. now that both of those things have happened (yay!) i am going to look into it and make sure my textbooks are available in that format and that i can take notes on it. if i can, then that is definitely what i am going with.

i've just always been more into books than computers anyway so i feel like i gotta stay true to my bookworm self 🙂 plus i already have a laptop (pc) and a desktop (mac) so i don't really even want another computer. yet.

Oh, the Sony Readers? I used to play with them while I was at work. Refresh time was sooooo slow!
 
The ebook market both device-wise and material-wise is still comparatively young (yes I'm aware it's been years since they've come out). There's a lot of materials that's out there, but there's a lot that ISN'T. Also, there's no format consensus or universal player yet so that also makes the market underdeveloped. Maybe Apple's contribution (though not their main motivation or intent) will be to turn this into a more mainstream market and popularize ereaders in general by coming out with the universal format itself or forcing competitors to join together in promoting a universal format rivaling Apple's.

Either way, I'm very intrigued by where this could take the market rather than the actual product. The "oh crap, Apple's in the market (finally with a crap product that we can top), let's band together and put out a opposing universal format and come up with cheaper devices that do a better job at what they're supposed to do" mentality will come about with competitors.

Let the games begin!
 
for what it's worth, Hitler doesn't like the iPad either:

[YOUTUBE]lQnT0zp8Ya4[/YOUTUBE]
 
now that both of those things have happened (yay!) i am going to look into it and make sure my textbooks are available in that format and that i can take notes on it. if i can, then that is definitely what i am going with.

Right now neither of these are true (i.e. the medical textbook availability is inadequate and only a few models allow you to write on them)
 
ipad4.jpg


Awaiting it's arrival to the storied lands of Apple TV...:laugh:
 
Advertisement - Members don't see this ad
Right now neither of these are true (i.e. the medical textbook availability is inadequate and only a few models allow you to write on them)

Still waiting on Inkling to drop some concrete examples on that front.
 
Flash will never make it onto iPhone or iPad. Apple's excuse is that flash is the single biggest reason why Macs have technical issues, which I do believe there is some truth to that statement. Apple somehow thinks keeping it off the handhelds will save them a lot of headache even if it means blocking out access to various websites using Flash. But Android phones will have Flash within the next few months. How much longer are they going to keep playing this game?

With regards to the iPad itself, any smartphone these days is more powerful and useful, all while costing less. Anything that I normally can't do with my Droid is what gets done on my laptop. Only thing missing on the laptop is a touchscreen, but I think we will start to see some awesome touchscreen laptops later this year, like the Ideapad U1 Hybrid. <<<This is the real future.
 
At least wait till the contoured iPad with wings comes out.
 
Still waiting on Inkling to drop some concrete examples on that front.

I'm skeptical of any third party company's ability to make significant headway. Any progress is going to come directly through the publishers - so far they have shown reluctance. I don't really blame them - they have a captive market of people who have little choice but to plop down $$$ for books like Robbins, etc.

An additional problem right now is that some e-text licenses expire (i.e. you are only "buying" them for a year). As someone about to enter a residency, I want access to texts for the long-term.
 
Oh poor apple.. My poor poor apple.

As much as everyone is not very impressed, I would still bet that apple sells a ton of these.. Even though people dont really know what to use it for.

"Few things its better at" Games??? I doubt that. I would like to have them show me how to play Warcraft 3 on that or Diablo III, Heroes of Might and Magic? I dnt think so!!

It still looks cool, and if I had money to burn, I would get one. Is it essential ( like my iPhone?) F-ck no.
 
I thought the iPad was a joke... wow... product fail.
 
Flash will never make it onto iPhone or iPad. Apple's excuse is that flash is the single biggest reason why Macs have technical issues, which I do believe there is some truth to that statement. Apple somehow thinks keeping it off the handhelds will save them a lot of headache even if it means blocking out access to various websites using Flash. But Android phones will have Flash within the next few months. How much longer are they going to keep playing this game?

With regards to the iPad itself, any smartphone these days is more powerful and useful, all while costing less. Anything that I normally can't do with my Droid is what gets done on my laptop. Only thing missing on the laptop is a touchscreen, but I think we will start to see some awesome touchscreen laptops later this year, like the Ideapad U1 Hybrid. <<<This is the real future.
My conspiracy theory about not allowing Flash is that it was an AT&T dealbreaker. Their 3G is so stressed and crappy as-is, that they told Apple, "Look, if you enable flash, you'll totally screw up our network that is already standing on one leg. And don't you say a word about it because Luke Wilson is going to be saying the exact opposite on all the commercials."

/end rant against AT&T
 
Advertisement - Members don't see this ad
My conspiracy theory about not allowing Flash is that it was an AT&T dealbreaker. Their 3G is so stressed and crappy as-is, that they told Apple, "Look, if you enable flash, you'll totally screw up our network that is already standing on one leg. And don't you say a word about it because Luke Wilson is going to be saying the exact opposite on all the commercials."

/end rant against AT&T
I think no flash is what makes the App Store sell more games and apps.
 
I think no flash is what makes the App Store sell more games and apps.
Probably, but taking away flash is like taking away half the internet. Big fail on Apple's part.
 
i thought those mini lap tops were a good idea.........this is like a really bad version of that. it doesnt even have a cover. where do you put it??? wtf m8

also, that hitler clip was really good.
 
i thought those mini lap tops were a good idea.........this is like a really bad version of that. it doesnt even have a cover. where do you put it??? wtf m8

Yeah, Apple and third parties would need to design new cases just for the iPad seeing as it would be awkward to carry around without some sort of case. Not a problem for them as it'd just be another way to profit from a need in the market. But it's obvious guys can't slip it into their pocket like an iPod or iPhone and girls would have to get the right sized purse to be able to store it.
 
Difference between this thing and iPod Touch? You can jog with iPod touch...

Seriously, am I missing anything else?
 
I was beyond excited when I saw this was being released. I had been hoping for a slate device I could bring to campus with me for net, e-books, and note-taking in class (ie, handwriting recognition).

Then I checked out the specs, apps (or lack thereof), and price.

If Macbook and iPad ever decide to hook up and make a baby, I'll totally buy it. Until then...not so much.
 
Yeah, I was thinking about this too. I think it's called eInk, and I've never really used it so I don't know much about it. This is what people mean by active vs inactive screen, though.


Well an active screen is a screen that is constantly refreshing much like a tv or a computer monitor usually the refresh rate is around 60-75Hz, an inactive screen only refreshes when told, like the Kindle, it will only refresh they screen when you hit the button for the next or previous page. This flicker on active screens produces a stroboscopic effect, which leads to a lot of eye strain, and nasty headaches. This is why most eBook readers have inactive screens, with eInk technology. This is also the reason I can't see the bookstore application being very helpful the active screen causes way too much stress on the eyes.
 
Well apparently everyone hates this thing. And for understandable reasons, I guess. But here is why I can ignore a lot of the "issues" with this thing.

Everyone complains: No camera,

Okay, honestly I have a camera on pretty much everything that has a battery nowadays, I can survice without another one, and I don't videoconference very often, sure it'd be nice, but not a deal breaker.

No Flash, whine whine whine, last time I looked most websites use flash for advertising, honestly, I'd prefer to not have to look at the flashy "100,000th visitor" ad and if you're complaining about your lack of farmville or other flash game, get a life. If you're complaining about hulu, oh well, I'm sure there will be an app for it, youtube has an app. So honestly, I could care less about flash when it really gets down to it.

People complain there's no multitasking, what do you really care, apps save the data everytime you close them, so yeah, it's an extra touch instead of just sliding on over to another app, stop being lazy. Okay so you can't read your aim messages, check facebook, and look at porn all at the same time, honestly, it's not that big of a deal, take things one at a time. You can still listen to music and browse the web at the same time.

Think about how this can be used, there are stylus based programs already available for this. Think about how you can use this in a hospital setting.
Think about the never-ending nightmare that is the paperwork that a doctor must complete, think of how many stories there are of lost paperwork, paperwork issues, digitization and what not. Every time a patient record is created on paper it now is entered into a computer system. Why not take the paper out of the equation, you can do that with an iPad, they already have applications for it.

500 dollars for a textbook reader, seems like a lot right? Well, I commute to school, I study at school, so I carry textbooks with me, now 1.5 pound thing that I can do virtually everything I can do with a normal textbook versus 15+ pounds in actual paper weight? My back will take the 1.5 pound thing. Especially since I will recoup that 500 dollar starting cost in TWO semesters of buying digital textbooks.

With high definition video, okay, so it doesn't fit you're 16:9 aspect ratio, I'm sorry, unless a device is a tv, 16:9 aspect ratios look dumb and disproportionate. Most screens, even HDTV's are not 16:9 aspect ratios. A 4:3 aspect ratio is just fine and dandy. If you're all good students intent upon medical school, then you'll know that an excellent extracurricular is research, you happen to do a lot of presentations when conducting research, or at least presenting your findings, it's a fact. Now look at what you can do with the presentation programs on the iPad, it's aspect ratio is set up to be exactly compatible with 90% of the projectors you'll find, and you won't have to juggle laserpointers, whiteboards, and a projector, you can write notes with your iPad that appear on screen, or you can use a "laser pointer" that is really your finger.

Honestly, I see a lot of real use out of this, sure not a lot for media use, but I've got a laptop, an iPod, and a Blackberry for that. The iPad seems like an ideal product, at this point, considering price, battery, warranty, software options, and utility.

So food for thought

P.S. - The price isn't that bad, the JooJoo, a competing tablet, has only a browser, it's 500, no 3G, and nothing close to the app store, no one even really knows crap about the HP slate, and the Archos 9 is about the junkiest you can get, considering it has a 2 hour battery and it runs Windows 7 (which I hear people want) but to fit that all in, it's thick, has a crappy screen, is expensive, and only runs 3 programs at a time.
 
Advertisement - Members don't see this ad
Bill Gates and Ballmer must be doing cartwheels with joy. Check this iPad killer out:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UmIgNfp-MdI

Question: Do you have any proof that this exists, or that this even comes from Microsoft? I just ask because most large technology companies don't really like releasing promotional videos of products under development, at least not before a press-released proof of concept such as what was given at CES with the HP Slate. Just curious to see if a relatively secretive industry is actually changing its tactics for once?
 

See, this is why the iPad is great for the below average to average computer user like yourself. But for everyone else, this isn't for them. The only laziness here I feel is by apple to not include a camera, multi tasking functionality, standard ports, or bluetooth. These are all options that companies now can effortlessly integrate in their hardware, yet Apple chose not to, probably to include in later revisions to maximize profits.

I've been a huge Apple fanboy for the better part of my life, but I've become increasingly frustrated with Apple's device lock-in and use of DRM and prorpietary hardware.
 
Flame On:

See, this is why the iPad is great for the below average to average computer user like yourself. But for everyone else, this isn't for them. The only laziness here I feel is by apple to not include a camera, multi tasking functionality, standard ports, or bluetooth. These are all options that companies now can effortlessly integrate in their hardware, yet Apple chose not to, probably to include in later revisions to maximize profits.

I've been a huge Apple fanboy for the better part of my life, but I've become increasingly frustrated with Apple's device lock-in and use of DRM and prorpietary hardware.

Really, below average computer user you say? I'm a CompTIA A+ certified technician. So unless the average computer user is trained in actually building and fixing computers to industry standards, I'd advise you to rethink your tactics. Just because I see potential use in a product that you don't particularly like does not mean that I am incompetent in the use of a computer.

In response to your actual statement, the iPad does include standard ports, in fact it has a port that is a standard on nearly 300 million devices across the globe, which as specialty ports go, is pretty standard. So much so that everything from cars to stereos come equipped with docking equipment for that port. If you don't like the port included, you can even adapt it to fit your other needs.

And the iPad does include bluetooth (do your research before you post) and will connect to everything from bluetooth keyboards to a macbook pro.

And honestly, have you ever even tried to fit the guts of what took up a 2x2x1 foot space plus a monitor into something about the size of a pad of legal paper? And if it is soooo easy for a company nowadays to fit that hardware into that form factor and make it run for 10 hours, why oh why do I see only one thing that can do that?

And you are so frustrated with Apple's use of DRM? They just removed DRM from their iTunes store. And the idea behind DRM isn't particularly a bad thing (sure in practice it sucks) people should be paid for the work they do.

And their proprietary hardware? Uhhh, last time I checked, most computer manufacturers have proprietary hardware, HP, Dell, Acer, Asus, they all have proprietary hardware. If you try to hack XBoxes you can legally be banned from XBox Live, if you try to tweak any computer that you bought pre-manufactured, whether it's a desktop or a laptop, you void the warranty if you modify it. Apple is no different in that respect. So, I'm not exactly seeing anything particularly anomalous here with proprietary hardware.

If you can actually inform me with your seemingly wondrous knowledge instead of subjecting me to your lack of research and ill-thought out personal attacks and arguments, please, by all means. I welcome an intelligent conversation.

P.S. I'm more of a Windows/Linux fan (depending on the day and computer) as I can build it to however I like, in fact I do just that for extra cash, but the iPad does seem to have its uses.
 
Last edited:
Flame On:

Cool down Johnny Torch. It wasn't my intention to offend you. I apologize if I hit a nerve.

Really, below average computer user you say? I'm a CompTIA A+ certified technician. So unless the average computer user is trained in actually building and fixing computers to industry standards, I'd advise you to rethink your tactics. Just because I see potential use in a product that you don't particularly like does not mean that I am incompetent in the use of a computer.
Ahh, A+ certification. I got A+ certified when I was 17. It was fun playing technician back in the day.

In response to your actual statement, the iPad does include standard ports, in fact it has a port that is a standard on nearly 300 million devices across the globe, which as specialty ports go, is pretty standard. So much so that everything from cars to stereos come equipped with docking equipment for that port. If you don't like the port included, you can even adapt it to fit your other needs.
The dock connector is proprietary hardware. One company using the port doesn't make it standard, no matter how many devices it pumps out. I actually like the dock connector, but I feel it should be possible for companies to make compatible devices without having to pay huge licensing fees to Apple.

And the iPad does include bluetooth (do your research before you post) and will connect to everything from bluetooth keyboards to a macbook pro.
Clearly I am a bit polarized on the product.

And you are so frustrated with Apple's use of DRM? They just removed DRM from their iTunes store. And the idea behind DRM isn't particularly a bad thing (sure in practice it sucks) people should be paid for the work they do.
Apple actually hasn't removed DRM from the iTunes store "(do your research before you post)", only the music section, but they still encode user data in each downloaded song. They continue to use DRM on movies, TV shows, and audiobooks. Oh and ringtones too I believe.

I'm not frustrated by Apple in particular for their use of DRM, but by any usage of DRM in general.

If any company other than Apple came out with a product like the iPad, it would have been laughed out of the convention center.
 
I have trouble not dropping iPhones and iPod touches (ipod touchs? How on earth do you pluralize that crap?), the iPad is like a nightmare. The design of those things is WAY too slippery. Does at least come with some sort of handle or gripping design?
 
@FutureScaresMe:

Lol, no you didn't hit a nerve, just joking around 🙂 (Btw it's Johnny Storm, not Torch)

I don't know if you intended it, but that whole post came off exceptionally condescending. So as mine can probably be interpreted in the same way, I'll try to cut it out here. Just note that I'm not actually that worked up about this, I'm enjoying the banter more than anything else and I don't mean personal insult in anything I say.

Yes, the dock connector is proprietary hardware, but considering the options available already for use with that connector, it isn't particularly a big deal in my eyes, mini-displayport isn't technically proprietary now that it's a standard connection, but you're really only going to see them on macs which limits the availability of 3rd party hardware peripherals that actually make use of that connector (since Macs don't even have a 10% computer market share), as opposed to the 30-pin connector which because of the spread of the iPod brand, means there is a plethora of 3rd party manufacturers of peripherals designed around that port, and since iPhone OS 3.0 allows for additional hardware to be tacked onto the iPhone/iPod Touch and now iPad, that allows one of the most active peripheral markets to provide users of the iPad with further peripheral devices.

And you pointed out that the only DRM free zone in the iTunes suite (I guess that's the most appropriate term considering the breadth of media available now) is the music section. I am aware of this, by using the name for the distribution program I was trying to convey that I was referring to the flagship (or at least namesake) product type of the program, that is, music (Plus it makes a more emphatic point to say iTunes as opposed to "the music in iTunes" lol).

And just curious about your comment about if any other company came out with a product like the iPad: What about the HP Slate, Archos 9, and JooJoo (or CrunchPad, depending on who you ask)? Those were all relatively lauded by the tech community weren't they, and they all have similar features (in the case of the HP slate, supposed features) relatively speaking. --> I'm oddly curious, because after the announcements for all of those products, and still after the iPad, people seem to be relatively mum, if not singing praise about those products, while they vehemently oppose the iPad. Which honestly, if only taking the products already announced for sale (the Archos and JooJoo), the iPad beats them on hardware specs and, for the most part on the software front as well, and in price, considering what you're getting.

Further, if you don't mind me asking, is it the concept of DRM that bothers you, or the implementation of it? (I liken that debate to how online homework is an excellent idea in theory, but the worst possible solution in most cases in actual practice) For me personally, I think DRM limits what I can do, I'm limited to how I actually view my content that I purchased and that given all prior mediums, I would have had full access to (albeit, records and tapes back in the day didn't have as much possible freedom to exploit), and whether or not I can listen to my music tomorrow is dependent on the whim of a company. Yet at the same time, I feel that it is important that the people who worked to bring this entertainment to me should be paid as tradition has it (I wouldn't mind less though 😉 ) and unfortunately there is an entire community of prodigious software geeks who want to illegally distribute all of that material, and while that market niche has always existed, it has never been to this degree before...
 
That will be a very sad day once schools require an iphone/itouch. I like my HD2 just the way it is, and I think it's better than those.
Also, my Arab friend's dad pronounced the "iPod" the "iPad" years ago, so I think he should get copyright on it 😛
Well at least now we'll have to ask him whether he's talking about the music player or the iphone with edema.
 
Well apparently everyone hates this thing. And for understandable reasons, I guess. But here is why I can ignore a lot of the "issues" with this thing.

Everyone complains: No camera,

Okay, honestly I have a camera on pretty much everything that has a battery nowadays, I can survice without another one, and I don't videoconference very often, sure it'd be nice, but not a deal breaker.

No Flash, whine whine whine, last time I looked most websites use flash for advertising, honestly, I'd prefer to not have to look at the flashy "100,000th visitor" ad and if you're complaining about your lack of farmville or other flash game, get a life. If you're complaining about hulu, oh well, I'm sure there will be an app for it, youtube has an app. So honestly, I could care less about flash when it really gets down to it.

People complain there's no multitasking, what do you really care, apps save the data everytime you close them, so yeah, it's an extra touch instead of just sliding on over to another app, stop being lazy. Okay so you can't read your aim messages, check facebook, and look at porn all at the same time, honestly, it's not that big of a deal, take things one at a time. You can still listen to music and browse the web at the same time.

Think about how this can be used, there are stylus based programs already available for this. Think about how you can use this in a hospital setting.
Think about the never-ending nightmare that is the paperwork that a doctor must complete, think of how many stories there are of lost paperwork, paperwork issues, digitization and what not. Every time a patient record is created on paper it now is entered into a computer system. Why not take the paper out of the equation, you can do that with an iPad, they already have applications for it.

500 dollars for a textbook reader, seems like a lot right? Well, I commute to school, I study at school, so I carry textbooks with me, now 1.5 pound thing that I can do virtually everything I can do with a normal textbook versus 15+ pounds in actual paper weight? My back will take the 1.5 pound thing. Especially since I will recoup that 500 dollar starting cost in TWO semesters of buying digital textbooks.

With high definition video, okay, so it doesn't fit you're 16:9 aspect ratio, I'm sorry, unless a device is a tv, 16:9 aspect ratios look dumb and disproportionate. Most screens, even HDTV's are not 16:9 aspect ratios. A 4:3 aspect ratio is just fine and dandy. If you're all good students intent upon medical school, then you'll know that an excellent extracurricular is research, you happen to do a lot of presentations when conducting research, or at least presenting your findings, it's a fact. Now look at what you can do with the presentation programs on the iPad, it's aspect ratio is set up to be exactly compatible with 90% of the projectors you'll find, and you won't have to juggle laserpointers, whiteboards, and a projector, you can write notes with your iPad that appear on screen, or you can use a "laser pointer" that is really your finger.

Honestly, I see a lot of real use out of this, sure not a lot for media use, but I've got a laptop, an iPod, and a Blackberry for that. The iPad seems like an ideal product, at this point, considering price, battery, warranty, software options, and utility.

So food for thought

P.S. - The price isn't that bad, the JooJoo, a competing tablet, has only a browser, it's 500, no 3G, and nothing close to the app store, no one even really knows crap about the HP slate, and the Archos 9 is about the junkiest you can get, considering it has a 2 hour battery and it runs Windows 7 (which I hear people want) but to fit that all in, it's thick, has a crappy screen, is expensive, and only runs 3 programs at a time.


Multitasking is absolutely HUGE, at least for me personally. Right now I have 3 firefox windows open with ~10 tabs each, 4 excel documents, 2 powerpoint presentations, a word file, endnote, and coreldraw. If this thing is going to replace my laptop, it definitely needs multitasking. If it isn't, I already have a phone with pretty much identical bells and whistles.
 
Advertisement - Members don't see this ad
Top Bottom