Once again, ALL ABOARD THE LOGIC TRAIN....
freddyx3 said:
OK Avin I'm going to put it real simple for you so you can understand,
You keep insisting on hardcore stats, and according to your own stats 15% of students specialize at temple and 35% do so at columbia, and you don't think this is a significant difference?
I have never seem someone who knows so little bout something be so biased against it. I wonder what the real reason is behind all your hostility???
Actually, as I recall, I was making the comparison to Tufts at 20%, and I didnt think that was a big difference, but if you brought up the comparison with Temple, thats cool.
The fact that 15% of Temple grads specialize says nothing of the school, because people who goto Temple most likely want to become GPs. However, if they wish to become specialists, they still have the option, because Temple had a 70% match rate last year in specialities. That meant that 70% of the people who applied from Temple into a postgrad got in. Pretty damn good stats. However, like I said, most Temple grads will go right into associate/practice, cause the school initially tells you that they are a school for GPs, so they attract people interested in GP. And once you graduate from Temple, you can become a GP just like they said. HOwever, once you become more accustomed to the science of dentistry and find a particular speciality interesting you can still become a specialist. A large amount of options available at Temple or any other clinically oriented school.
Whereas at Columbia, they tell you to come there to be a specialist, but that just aint always the case as Ive shown for the last 6 pages of posts.
StarGirl said:
woah wait a min! i know someone that was offered a job but decided they'll rather do a GPR and i know another person that is doing a GPR by choice even tho he's passed the boards already. Trust me, just because there's a good number of people that choose to do a GPR, it doesn't meant that they HAVE to.
No one is holding a gun to someone's head saying you HAVE to do a GPR, but the reason they choose to do GPRs is because they are not confident of their actual dental skills, cause they havent gotten enough practice. Its clear logic and I dont know why school pride is getting in the way of understanding a simplistic argument. Dentistry requires the use of hands, and like anything else that uses your hands,
YOU NEED TO PRACTICE. Be it dentistry, guitar, building models, its takes practice to get it right. Hence, the importance of clinical skills, which unfortunately, Columbia does not have.
Doggie said:
As for Avin's comment about Columbia students being forced into GPR if they did not match..........I dont know where you got that info from......perhaps you need to stay away from smoking skunks or rolling J's. NO ONE in their right minds will hire a newly graduated dentist........REGARDLESS of where the student graduated from. (Unless of course if you have family connections like UBTom). Why do you think it's so freaking hard for an undergrad to perform any kinds of research. I dont care if the dental school is #1 in clinics.....everyone wants a person with some real world experience. You need to get your facts straight before forming these ridiculous conclusions. Leave the statistical analysis to people who actually know what they are talking about.
Well Doggie, Im still gonna smoke my blunts, but I also still gonna get my stats from the ADA. Ever heard of them? The American Dental Association? Their website is
www.ada.org.
So please explain why according to the ADA, 70% of people go into private practice when they graduate? The fact that you would say a comment like this which ANY idiot, predent or not would know amazes me and makes me begin to wonder why a 2nd year Columbian would say something like that. THere goes your credibility buddy! I really cant believe that you think that EVERY dental student has to do more than 4 years to go into private practice...If thats what they teach you at Columbia, damn, they are doing well on their brainwashing techniques. The fact that you dont know what an associateship is scares me....Dude, what have u been doing during your last two years at Columbia?? OH yah...you are the dental student and I am the predental student......I forgot...stupid stupid me!!!!
StarGirl said:
Avi... i have a feeling you were either 1. rejected or 2. waitlisted. I remember asking you a while ago and you said you haven't heard from columbia... and usually you hear from us pretty soon after your interview...
YEAHHHHHH...I was waiting for someone to bring this up....I knew someone was gonna think that Im only saying this stuff about Columbia because Im bitter...HAHAHHA....It actually came later than I thought. But once again, assumptions of my Columbia friends are wrong. Well, when I interviewed there, I didnt buy into their rhetoric that they were spouting during the interview, and if any other people are on SDN that interviewed on Feb. 27, they can vouch for me that right after the interview when we met outside, I was the only one doubting the school and what they were saying. So I gave it a chance....was excited....interviewed.....very dissapointed, cause the facts began to make sense. I was only considering it for their MPH combined degree, but the lack of the most important part of a dental education (clinical skills) made me think otherwise.
freddyx3 said:
In MY opinion, I think going to columbia will equip me with the whole dental arsenal if you will. Even if that takes one extra year. What's one extra year worth in the lifetime of your career, basically next to nothing.
Wow Freddy....once again, as UBTom has shown, your ignorance amazes me. But Im glad we both are finally acknowleding that Columbia indeed DOES NOT give you all the opportunities in 4 years that you were saying so confidently before? And sure...whats one extra year, large tuition, average facilities, and the chance to live in a box like dorm.......who cares right? You get the prestigous IVY LEAGUE ELITIST PRIDE that this debate has shown can matter so much!! WOOOHOOOO!