Job market for different specialties?

This forum made possible through the generous support of SDN members, donors, and sponsors. Thank you.

imidazzle92

Full Member
7+ Year Member
Joined
Jan 9, 2016
Messages
53
Reaction score
51
What are the best resources to learn about job markets for different specialties? I could always search for "[Insert specialist] Jobs near [Location]" on Google but sites like Indeed are only so reliable.

Members don't see this ad.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 user
What are the best resources to learn about job markets for different specialties? I could always search for "[Insert specialist] Jobs near [Location]" on Google but sites like Indeed are only so reliable.
Would love to know for peds surgeons
 
numerous threads on sdn: worst job markets are er,radonc, and path due to greedy program expansion, and in the case of radonc, plunging utilization.
 
Members don't see this ad :)
numerous threads on sdn: worst job markets are er,radonc, and path due to greedy program expansion, and in the case of radonc, plunging utilization.
I've read through specialty-specific threads but wonder if there are any better resources/search engines to get a sense of job demand in particular areas. Probably specialty dependent...but kinda wish there was something better than Indeed/generic job search engines.
 
I mean you're asking us to predict the future, which is next to impossible. If you go into something like primary care you are probably fine most places assuming you're reasonable with what you want your career to look like. For example if you wanted to be a PCP in NYC making 500k and only working 30 hours a week that would be unrealistic.

Someone above asked about peds surgery and that would be at the very least 7 years from now. Lots of things can change between now and then. In a niche field like that it depends on if hospitals and departments have openings for you to fill. So even if the job had an overall good outlook, there is no way to say when exactly docs will retire, move around, or decide they want to shift their career in a way that would open up a spot for you to fill.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 3 users
I mean you're asking us to predict the future, which is next to impossible. If you go into something like primary care you are probably fine most places assuming you're reasonable with what you want your career to look like. For example if you wanted to be a PCP in NYC making 500k and only working 30 hours a week that would be unrealistic.

Someone above asked about peds surgery and that would be at the very least 7 years from now. Lots of things can change between now and then. In a niche field like that it depends on if hospitals and departments have openings for you to fill. So even if the job had an overall good outlook, there is no way to say when exactly docs will retire, move around, or decide they want to shift their career in a way that would open up a spot for you to fill.
Good point. It is a bit daunting to decide to work toward going into a very-specialized field without a stronger understanding of the job market. Sure, X specialty might be really cool and I'd be able to get a job somewhere in the country but I'd rather pick a slightly less interesting specialty to have the option of practicing in a particular location.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 user
Good point. It is a bit daunting to decide to work toward going into a very-specialized field without a stronger understanding of the job market. Sure, X specialty might be really cool and I'd be able to get a job somewhere in the country but I'd rather pick a slightly less interesting specialty to have the option of practicing in a particular location.
Multiple surveys of senior residents show that location is single most important factor in job search. Don’t forget many of us have Educated spouses with their own limitations or aging parents.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 users
No other way than to ask people in the field. Ideally, ask younger people in the field who have been on the job market recently. There’s just too much nuance to capture it on a thread.

Sdn threads can definitely alert you to problematic fields in a general sense. Your individual needs will dictate much of what’s possible. Personally I wouldn’t pick a field based on job market, but I would definitely avoid a field based on it.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 5 users
Surgical specialties seem to have the widest moat but if you don’t like surgery,

Radiology, neurology, pathology seem to be relatively safe from scope creep for now.

In addition to the ones above, I would probably avoid psych and derm. At least where I’m from, NPs/PAs are already starting to outnumber doctors in these fields at some hospitals
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 user
Surgical specialties seem to have the widest moat but if you don’t like surgery,

Radiology, neurology, pathology seem to be relatively safe from scope creep for now.

In addition to the ones above, I would probably avoid psych and derm. At least where I’m from, NPs/PAs are already starting to outnumber doctors in these fields at some hospitals
Pathology has also suffered from unjustified expansion. Less than half path residents are us MDs? Many do multiple fellowships.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 user
Pathology has also suffered from unjustified expansion. Less than half path residents are us MDs? Many do multiple fellowships.
I heard about this but thought things might be getting better as there was recently a “jobs galore” thread in the sub forum

I don’t know why neurology isn’t more popular. Similar timeframe to IM/FM/Peds but get a decent bump in pay and deal with more interesting subject matter (in my opinion)
 
Members don't see this ad :)
I heard about this but thought things might be getting better as there was recently a “jobs galore” thread in the sub forum

I don’t know why neurology isn’t more popular. Similar timeframe to IM/FM/Peds but get a decent bump in pay and deal with more interesting subject matter (in my opinion)
Neuro is a love it or hate it type thing from what I've seen. The residency is brutal and while the treatments have improved a lot in efficacy, many of the more prominent illnesses can't be resolved just yet. The physical exam is insanely interesting though and outpatient Neuro is a good lifestyle with interesting cases. I do believe the field is going to hit a breakthrough point in the next few decades, tons of research in the field. Still low-key hoping Neuropsychiatry/Behavioral Neurology becomes a more fleshed out career path besides research, as there is a lot of overlap in patient populations but many seem adamant in keeping them separate.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 4 users
I don’t know why neurology isn’t more popular. Similar timeframe to IM/FM/Peds but get a decent bump in pay and deal with more interesting subject matter (in my opinion)
Historically it's because the brain was a black box for vast majority of modern medicine, with insults to the brain leading to poor prognoses with hit or miss treatments. That has dramatically changed in the past 20 years, but old stigmas die hard. Ever since we could start thrombolysing strokes and retrieving clots, it changed the game in neuro. Rapid proliferation of clinical trials has led to some great advancements in the field with still a lot to be discovered. I agree with the other poster that we'll likely see even greater breakthroughs in the next 20 years than we saw in the past 20 years.

Depending on the type of neuro you go into, it can also lead to a less than stellar call schedule without fantastic pay. I think that'll still keep it from being as competitive as it might otherwise be moving forward.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 users
To answer OP's question briefly: you will learn about the job market - particularly community - when you apply to jobs. Unfortunately, there is no other great resource.

I don’t know why neurology isn’t more popular
It's getting more popular, but the answer is there is nationally very poor exposure to neurology in medical school. A large percentage of medical students either do not rotate in neurology or get a limited exposure to outpatient neurology only. As an example, a large number of "academic" neurology jobs are actually essentially community jobs at an academic center, where you can work with residents who consult you, but who do not actually rotate with you. Because of this, many places will offer lucrative contracts for people who can handle even the most basic bread-and-butter neurology stuff (headaches and uncomplicated neuropathy as outpatient, altered mental status and uncomplicated stroke as inpatient) because, quite simply, even well-trained IM/FM physicians - let alone APPs - often have zero experience with these things.

Neurology is also complex because patients can often have entirely subjective symptoms (e.g. headache, vertigo, pain), "fake" symptoms (functional neurological disorders, which are way more common than people think), or show up straight-up dead. Inpatient neurology can be a very morbid field - I've been consulted to determine "is the patient alive or dead?" or to inform parents their child's suicide attempt was successful - and that's certainly not a career for everyone.

Neuropsychiatry/Behavioral Neurology becomes a more fleshed out career path
Not happening anytime soon. Behavioral neurology in practice is 95-99% patients with advanced Alzheimer's, iatrogenic cognitive dysfunction (e.g. benzos), or anxious/depressed patients who score 29/30 on MoCAs. This may change someday, but (in my opinion) there are few behavioral cases where the specialist can offer meaningful care beyond that of a general neurologist. For now, it's essentially an academic-only field.

Depending on the type of neuro you go into, it can also lead to a less than stellar call schedule without fantastic pay
This is true only in academics. While community neurologists probably won't make as much as GI specialists or interventional cardiologists, neurologists should expect to be paid a good amount more than their average IM counterparts.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 2 users
In addition to the ones above, I would probably avoid psych and derm. At least where I’m from, NPs/PAs are already starting to outnumber doctors in these fields at some hospitals
Psychiatrists are very much in demand, more so as the country is voicing recognition of the importance of paying attention to mental health. Many hospitals seem to be turning to NPs because they can't find enough psychiatrists to fill their needs.
 
  • Like
  • Wow
Reactions: 6 users
Psychiatrists are very much in demand, more so as the country is voicing recognition of the importance of paying attention to mental health. Many hospitals seem to be turning to NPs because they can't find enough psychiatrists to fill their needs.

Is it because they can't find psychiatrists, or because its cheaper to hire NPs?
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 user
Is it because they can't find psychiatrists, or because its cheaper to hire NPs?
Psychiatrists are in huge demand. One of the few specialties left where you can easily hang your own shingle.

To add my own 2c, the General Surgery job market seems to be doing pretty well judging by my email inbox and the job offers our chiefs are getting (the ones not doing fellowship).
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: 4 users
Is it because they can't find psychiatrists, or because its cheaper to hire NPs?
Based on what I'm hearing and seeing as a psychiatrist, it's mostly because they can't find psychiatrists.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 3 users
Psychiatrists are in huge demand. One of the few specialties left where you can easily hang your own shingle.

To add my own 2c, the General Surgery job market seems to be doing pretty well judging by my email inbox and the job offers our chiefs are getting (the ones no
Interesting. With so many people going into fellowship I wondered how the general surgery market was doing.
 
I can’t tell for sure, but this is a big metro area where psychiatrists make well below the national average (for psychiatrists) due to oversupply, so it seems odd that it would be an under supply thing unless none want to work at an academic center.

Maybe all of the psychiatrists around want to start their own places?
 
Last edited:
Interesting. With so many people going into fellowship I wondered how the general surgery market was doing.
For those willing to do true general surgery it’s wide open.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 5 users
Based on what I'm hearing and seeing as a psychiatrist, it's mostly because they can't find psychiatrists.
yep, generally were in the top 3 or so highest in demand specialties. agreed that we def have a huge job market

Even with NPs, the demand is still incredibly high. And I dont see mental health improving anytime soon in this country. Oh, and the fact that the majority of psychiatrists are older and will be retiring in 10 years or so, leaving an even more massive gap
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 users
Pathology has also suffered from unjustified expansion. Less than half path residents are us MDs? Many do multiple fellowships.


One of my good friends is chief of pathology at our local VA. There is a current shortage of graduating path residents. Nobody is doing 2 fellowships at this time.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 users
Anesthesia is pretty good right now due to increased utilization. Every group I know of is short staffed and hiring as fast as they can. Lots of jobs in large coastal metro areas offer 500k+ to start. Because of the staffing shortage, I know one group just gave notice to a hospital with a relatively poor payor mix in order to redirect their manpower to their better paying hospitals.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: 2 users
I can’t tell for sure, but this is a big metro area where psychiatrists make well below the national average (for psychiatrists) due to oversupply, so it seems odd that it would be an under supply thing unless none want to work at an academic center.

Maybe all of the psychiatrists around want to start their own places?


I’m in Southern California. Psychiatrists here charge $250-350/hr and don’t deal with insurance. They’ll give you a super bill that you can submit to your insurance company for reimbursement but patients still need to pay the bill first. It still takes 3-4 months for new patients to get an appointment.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 3 users
For those willing to do true general surgery it’s wide open.


Does true general surgery=robotic surgery nowadays? Seems like more and more hernias, choles, and colectomies are robotic these days. We have 3 Davincis and our surgeons are always fighting for them.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 user
Is it because they can't find psychiatrists, or because its cheaper to hire NPs?
The demand but no desire.

Prisons, jails, state hospitals, VA, community mental health centers, juvenile homes, and other publicly funded orgs have huge demand for psychiatrists. But most psychiatrists (like most physicians) have no desire to subject themselves to government bureaucracy, poor working and safety conditions, unwilling and sometimes hostile patient population, and societal and familial expectations that psychiatrists should be able to unilaterally "fix" everything with psychotropics and magic/therapy.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 users
I’m in Southern California. Psychiatrists here charge $250-350/hr and don’t deal with insurance. They’ll give you a super bill that you can submit to your insurance company for reimbursement but patients still need to pay the bill first. It still takes 3-4 months for new patients to get an appointment.
Wait, what? That's actually a low hourly rate.
 
Does true general surgery=robotic surgery nowadays? Seems like more and more hernias, choles, and colectomies are robotic these days. We have 3 Davincis and our surgeons are always fighting for them.
Yeah a lot of those cases are being done robotically these days by many general surgeons. Most residency programs I am familiar with will get you robot certification by the time you graduate.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 user
Yeah I heard nyc and Bay Area are a lot more. SoCal is the boonies.
Yeah, maybe, but housing costs in the Bay Area are substantially higher than in most of So Cal. It's not what you make, it's what you keep after expenses.
 
Surgical specialties seem to have the widest moat but if you don’t like surgery,

Radiology, neurology, pathology seem to be relatively safe from scope creep for now.

In addition to the ones above, I would probably avoid psych and derm. At least where I’m from, NPs/PAs are already starting to outnumber doctors in these fields at some hospitals
I’m assuming Derm hasn’t been invaded because the high-payer /cosmetics patients are the type to actually care what type of provider they have , and to a lesser extent where their training was.

Midlevels aren’t interested in the Medicaid low income or rural patient types.

If the Derm providers were to be pushed out.. it would’ve happened long ago.
 
I’m assuming Derm hasn’t been invaded because the high-payer /cosmetics patients are the type to actually care what type of provider they have , and to a lesser extent where their training was.

Midlevels aren’t interested in the Medicaid low income or rural patient types.

If the Derm providers were to be pushed out.. it would’ve happened long ago.
Derm has been invaded by private equity/venture capitalists. Google it.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 5 users
I’m assuming Derm hasn’t been invaded because the high-payer /cosmetics patients are the type to actually care what type of provider they have , and to a lesser extent where their training was.

Midlevels aren’t interested in the Medicaid low income or rural patient types.

If the Derm providers were to be pushed out.. it would’ve happened long ago.
This is less true in cosmetic derm than plastics in my experience. Of course for serious things (ie skin cancer), people will go to the best possible person. However, for a lot of cosmetic and laser type things, they’ll go to whoever is cheapest, especially if they can get an NP/PA/assistant at a shop owned by a doc. One derm in my area who went to a big time school and now owns a practice that is affiliated with a major hospital (not really sure if it’s a partnership or just referrals) hires tons of non-doctors to do laser and other cosmetic stuff

I think that plastics had a much better future than derm. When it comes to the OR, people want the best no matter what. Even then, for some non complicated things, they’ll settle for lower price
 
  • Like
Reactions: 2 users
I’m assuming Derm hasn’t been invaded because the high-payer /cosmetics patients are the type to actually care what type of provider they have , and to a lesser extent where their training was.

Midlevels aren’t interested in the Medicaid low income or rural patient types.

If the Derm providers were to be pushed out.. it would’ve happened long ago.
Derm has been invaded by PE, and residency spots have exploded in the last number of years. It’s a troubling trend for the specialty.
 
  • Like
  • Sad
Reactions: 3 users
Derm has been invaded by PE, and residency spots have exploded in the last number of years. It’s a troubling trend for the specialty.
I graduated from medical school 20 years ago and that time, no us grad had to worry about employment. Subsequently, certain specialties have unjustifiably expanded resident numbers, driven entirely by program greed. Started with path around 2007 and then spread to radonc and er. Jobs have become a real issue in radonc and ER. At least with derm, there will always be out of pocket demand for cosmetic services.
1652967558312.jpeg
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: 1 users
Ironically, based on path forums and Reddit, job market doesn’t seem too bad for pathology these days
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 user
Ironically, based on path forums and Reddit, job market doesn’t seem too bad for pathology these days
True, but it got so bad that for a while many programs were going unmatched and multiple fellowships were routine. Is this a temporary blip? Professional path societies are controlled by quest, big lab cos. Wouldn’t want to be part of any specialty where the professional society’s interest is to decrease the salary of its members. In radonc, the chairman of wash u 10 years ago wrote an editorial that he wanted to increase resident numbers to bring down faculty salaries!

Urology and optho have been incredibly responsible about managing their specialty in sustainable manner.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: 1 users
Surgical specialties seem to have the widest moat but if you don’t like surgery,

Radiology, neurology, pathology seem to be relatively safe from scope creep for now.

In addition to the ones above, I would probably avoid psych and derm. At least where I’m from, NPs/PAs are already starting to outnumber doctors in these fields at some hospitals
I'm in psych in a general location with many, many psychiatrists AND psych NPs, and the job market for graduating residents seems to be very strong even just within a 50-mile radius of our program. A couple of my friends got 300k starting at academic programs (inpatient).
 
  • Like
Reactions: 3 users
I'm in psych in a general location with many, many psychiatrists AND psych NPs, and the job market for graduating residents seems to be very strong even just within a 50-mile radius of our program. A couple of my friends got 300k starting at academic programs (inpatient).
I’ve heard it’s good too from browsing some of the sub forums, but I was just trying to give OP some of the specialties generally considered to be less accessible to NP/PA. That’s why I didn’t include psych, derm, gas etc.

300k for academics! Wow! Is inpatient more exciting to you?
 
Is it because they can't find psychiatrists, or because its cheaper to hire NPs?

Because they can’t find them. Even in perhaps the most competitive area of the country, I basically submitted one application for the job that seemed to most fit my career goals, went on one interview and was promptly offered the job. I also went to a very well-regarded residency program and will be a fellowship-trained forensic psychiatrist (which is relatively rare), but still . . . Not hard to find a job at all.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: 1 user
I think the point is moreso not trying to comment on the market now but 5 years from now. Isn’t independent pa/np practice still relatively new in New York State. Now there is even more of an incentive for New Yorkers to pursue these degrees. There could be a lag period.
 
Top