Actually I thought logic had to be applied to the reading sections to eliminate answer choices. It wasnt subjective...just a process of filtering through what was incorrect/not as correct compared to the right answer. stupid? maybe. but there was reasoning behind it. I could explain in words why I choose each answer i did on that section over the others and why the other choices were wrong when compared with the correct answer.
Logic is not just found in math...word analogy problems are based on the logic of how words fit together, so in a way that section does measure logical ability
If you are going to say we'll never have to say "bovine" to be a pharmacist you might as well also start picking apart the whole test. You arent going to need to do gen chem gas law problems to be a pharmacist. You aren't going to have to know alot of that random bio stuff they put on the test to be a pharmacist. Basically I think its a test to make sure you walked away from a few years of college with some knowledge of something.
did i mention creative writing abilities? no. You brought that into the mix.
Writing things that utilize proper grammar and have a good structure is a skill in any profession. Some people are simply horrible writers and they come off sounding silly in written correspondence.
