- Joined
- Sep 13, 2022
- Messages
- 3,579
- Reaction score
- 4,852
I want to address this bit to ensure that my methods are interpreted as I intend, regardless of how anyone reads me. I don't have any interest in "talking a big game". I am interested only in trying to solve the game, and to do so I am relying on both my own judgments and on the judgments of others. That is helping me to build a full perspective of the game, and I don't believe it is ever too early for that.It's easy to talk a big game.
I could well be wrong about stuff. My reads could be straight up terrible. They were bad in Time to Get a WWatch. But I have to trust in my own ability to make judgments, within reason, or else I am going to second-guess everything I say and do and be paralyzed to make any progress. It's entirely possible that my reads are extra stinky poopoo, and if anyone tells me so I will listen to that. But I need specifics. Telling me in broad strokes that I am "too confident" is a misunderstanding of my approach, and telling me in broad strokes that "the mafia aren't likely to be quiet" without referencing who isn't quiet doesn't move the needle (@mightyrunner7). That doesn't mean I am not receptive to other viewpoints. I love other viewpoints. That's all I want.
Teamwork makes the dreamwork.