Locums Market Temp Check

Started by Coffee PRN
This forum made possible through the generous support of SDN members, donors, and sponsors. Thank you.
Get help with your application

Use all the free resources available to you from SDN: articles, guides, expert advising, forums discussions, and school research.

Literally just received this email (I know you said no boonies, but...). Says supervising residents, which I have to assume means UC Davis/Sacramento, which is actually quite nice. Not sure there are other anesthesia residencies in "central california."

I hope you’re doing well. I wanted to share a great locums opportunity for a Board Certified Anesthesiologist in Central California starting mid-July and ongoing into 2026.

Assignment Details:

  • Schedule: Monday–Friday, 7:00 AM – 5:00 PM
  • Call: 1:5 weeknight call (call takers needed); weekend call optional
  • Setting: Main OR, Endoscopy, and some OB cases
  • Responsibilities: Supervising residents while also handling your own cases
  • EMR: Cerner
This is a solid long-term opportunity with a balanced case mix and consistent schedule.

If you’re interested or would like more details, feel free to reply to this email or give me a call—I’d be happy to discuss further.

Jackson Parker| 678-277-3068| [email protected]
 
Advertisement - Members don't see this ad
Literally just received this email (I know you said no boonies, but...). Says supervising residents, which I have to assume means UC Davis/Sacramento, which is actually quite nice. Not sure there are other anesthesia residencies in "central california."

I hope you’re doing well. I wanted to share a great locums opportunity for a Board Certified Anesthesiologist in Central California starting mid-July and ongoing into 2026.

Assignment Details:

  • Schedule: Monday–Friday, 7:00 AM – 5:00 PM
  • Call: 1:5 weeknight call (call takers needed); weekend call optional
  • Setting: Main OR, Endoscopy, and some OB cases
  • Responsibilities: Supervising residents while also handling your own cases
  • EMR: Cerner
This is a solid long-term opportunity with a balanced case mix and consistent schedule.

If you’re interested or would like more details, feel free to reply to this email or give me a call—I’d be happy to discuss further.

Jackson Parker| 678-277-3068| [email protected]


Could also be this recently opened program.


Or Kaweah delta in Visalia.


Both much less desirable than Davis/sacramento.
 
Average rate is 400/hr in CA these days. In line with national average.
Miami is horrible $275/hr in many places. $300/hr. If u are lucky $350-hr

It’s all regional what rates pay
$400/hr should net u $650-700k and leave you 10 weeks off. And limited calls and nights and weekends. That’s pretty good even in high cost California and if it’s 1099.
 
400/hr all inclusive. Decent for locals, not so great for out of state.
That’s not bad.
Envison and even Napa have stupid 75 miles or 60 miles “rules” for locals so they don’t want locals

but of course if they are desperate they will make exceptions. They started requiring drivers license checks 2 years ago.
 
Advertisement - Members don't see this ad
That’s not bad.
Envison and even Napa have stupid 75 miles or 60 miles “rules” for locals so they don’t want locals

but of course if they are desperate they will make exceptions. They started requiring drivers license checks 2 years ago.


Thanks to AAEM, Envision completely exited the state of CA. They have no remaining sites in NorCal or SoCal.


“MILWAUKEE – The American Academy of Emergency Medicine Physician Group’s (AAEM-PG) lawsuit against Envision Healthcare and Envision Physician Services charging them with illegally engaging in the corporate practice of medicine (CPOM) has ended with the healthcare giant withdrawing from all operations in the State of California. AAEM-PG resolved the case on confidential terms, including a partial reimbursement of AAEM-PG’s attorneys’ fees and costs relating to the suit. Even without a final judgment, however, the case may have a lasting impact in California for lay entities who seek to purchase medical practices and the private equity companies that fund those purchases.

The suit challenged the “friendly physician model” by which non-physicians operate a medical practice in violation of law. In order not to run afoul of rules barring lay businesses from employing doctors, a single “friendly physician” owns a physician group that acts as the direct employer of physicians, but a lay entity nominally providing management services is really in control of the practice, including, billing, staffing, hours, payor contracting, and budgets. The suit alleged the friendly physician was not in fact the real owner of the medical group because of stock transfer agreements that did not allow him to realize profits from the entity aside from a salary set by the lay entity or, to transfer his ownership of the group without consent of the lay entity. The model is used throughout the nation.“
 
Thanks to AAEM, Envision completely exited the state of CA. They have no remaining sites in NorCal or SoCal.


“MILWAUKEE – The American Academy of Emergency Medicine Physician Group’s (AAEM-PG) lawsuit against Envision Healthcare and Envision Physician Services charging them with illegally engaging in the corporate practice of medicine (CPOM) has ended with the healthcare giant withdrawing from all operations in the State of California. AAEM-PG resolved the case on confidential terms, including a partial reimbursement of AAEM-PG’s attorneys’ fees and costs relating to the suit. Even without a final judgment, however, the case may have a lasting impact in California for lay entities who seek to purchase medical practices and the private equity companies that fund those purchases.

The suit challenged the “friendly physician model” by which non-physicians operate a medical practice in violation of law. In order not to run afoul of rules barring lay businesses from employing doctors, a single “friendly physician” owns a physician group that acts as the direct employer of physicians, but a lay entity nominally providing management services is really in control of the practice, including, billing, staffing, hours, payor contracting, and budgets. The suit alleged the friendly physician was not in fact the real owner of the medical group because of stock transfer agreements that did not allow him to realize profits from the entity aside from a salary set by the lay entity or, to transfer his ownership of the group without consent of the lay entity. The model is used throughout the nation.“
California has difference rules for employing doctors w2 than other states.

Notice most of California is 1099 jobs for anesthesia outside of Kaiser and or academic or state supported hospitals
 
California has difference rules for employing doctors w2 than other states.

Notice most of California is 1099 jobs for anesthesia outside of Kaiser and or academic or state supported hospitals


Nah lots of private groups are W2 but they are truly physician owned, the physician owners share the profits and important decisions are made by the physician owners. That’s the key test. That’s one reason that there are so many physician only practices remaining in the state and big metro areas are still predominantly physician only.
 
Nah lots of private groups are W2 but they are truly physician owned, the physician owners share the profits and important decisions are made by the physician owners. That’s the key test. That’s one reason that there are so many physician only practices remaining in the state and big metro areas are still predominantly physician only.
I think you guys are saying the same thing. CA corporate practice of medicine law is pretty strong; ergo, private practice is still surviving.
 
Nah lots of private groups are W2 but they are truly physician owned, the physician owners share the profits and important decisions are made by the physician owners. That’s the key test. That’s one reason that there are so many physician only practices remaining in the state and big metro areas are still predominantly physician only.
I’m talking strict w2. No K1 or whatever else is being offered. Pretax cars etc.

California laws are different and envision doesn’t offer that structure for most places including California.

Outside a few sellouts I know where the original Sheridan kicked back the original partners 100-300k annual in profit sharing. On top of their w2 salary. Every employee (who was not in on those special buyout deals) was paid straight w2 outside the few practices that negotiated those type of buyouts.
 
I think you guys are saying the same thing. CA corporate practice of medicine law is pretty strong; ergo, private practice is still surviving.
Yes. Different states. Different laws. It’s not that Envison (Sheridan when they came into the state) left the state on its own. It’s the state laws and the business structure
 
Also remember envision was exiting bankruptcy around the time of withdrawal.

It’s a pretty hallow victory if you want to claim victory.

Private equity guys made their money off envision way before it went into trouble
 
I’m talking strict w2. No K1 or whatever else is being offered. Pretax cars etc.

California laws are different and envision doesn’t offer that structure for most places including California.

Outside a few sellouts I know where the original Sheridan kicked back the original partners 100-300k annual in profit sharing. On top of their w2 salary. Every employee (who was not in on those special buyout deals) was paid straight w2 outside the few practices that negotiated those type of buyouts.


Yes strict W2. No K1.
 
Why would you pay ur self strict w2 if you are physician owners?

U gotta have access to defined benefits up to 200k pretax and others pretax structures.

Pretax retirement savings hits $200k around age 40. All other legitimate business expenses also paid pretax and never shows up on W2.
 
They said the paid themselves a strict w2. This is not the case.

When you work for Envison as a “strict” w2, you do not get luxuries like this massive pretax deductions.

Details bruh. Details people leave out that they “paid themselves a strict w2”

Completely false statement.
 
Advertisement - Members don't see this ad
They said the paid themselves a strict w2. This is not the case.

When you work for Envison as a “strict” w2, you do not get luxuries like this massive pretax deductions.

Details bruh. Details people leave out that they “paid themselves a strict w2”

Completely false statement.


I never worked for envision.

We’re a 100% physician owned group. Like all business owner/employees we are allowed to have tax deferred 401k, profit sharing, and CBP plans and we have all 3 because we’re not stupid.
 
I never worked for envision.

We’re a 100% physician owned group. Like all business owner/employees we are allowed to have tax deferred 401k, profit sharing, and CBP plans and we have all 3 because we’re not stupid.
Correct. That’s the real drawback with working with these management companies. Too much w2 income exposed to taxes.

When my private group in Florida (contract got stolen by team health). I looked at team health package and didn’t want my w2 income being exposed.

Our private group had similar pretax benefits like your private group for partners and employees.

We aren’t stupid either

But I would never call the practice arrangement “strict” w2. That’s what I meant by you aren’t strict w2 with those pretax arrangements

Strict w2 to me is

1. 401/403b pretax (or Roth these days) with potentially employer matching ). These big amc like team health and Envison offer zero matching for doctors

No other true pretax benefits. Sure u get healthcare /fsa/hsa maybe some small education stipend.

But it’s not like our private group where we had a stash of 100k to pay healthcare, cme , cars pretax) per employee.

Amcs do not offer that. And that’s what I mean by strict w2. Almost all income exposed to w2 taxes

You are not a strict w2. Its your working

I made 400k 1099 last year and paid myself 100k w2. Am I a “strict” w2 employee of my own company? No. Because I control pretax deductions.
 
Correct. That’s the real drawback with working with these management companies. Too much w2 income exposed to taxes.

When my private group in Florida (contract got stolen by team health). I looked at team health package and didn’t want my w2 income being exposed.

Our private group had similar pretax benefits like your private group for partners and employees.

We aren’t stupid either

But I would never call the practice arrangement “strict” w2. That’s what I meant by you aren’t strict w2 with those pretax arrangements

Strict w2 to me is

1. 401/403b pretax (or Roth these days) with potentially employer matching ). These big amc like team health and Envison offer zero matching for doctors

No other true pretax benefits. Sure u get healthcare /fsa/hsa maybe some small education stipend.

But it’s not like our private group where we had a stash of 100k to pay healthcare, cme , cars pretax) per employee.

Amcs do not offer that. And that’s what I mean by strict w2. Almost all income exposed to w2 taxes

You are not a strict w2. Its your working

I made 400k 1099 last year and paid myself 100k w2. Am I a “strict” w2 employee of my own company? No. Because I control pretax deductions.


We don’t do cars. Our lawyers told us not to. We can deduct mileage if we travel from one site to another on the same day which is very rare.
 
Literally just received this email (I know you said no boonies, but...). Says supervising residents, which I have to assume means UC Davis/Sacramento, which is actually quite nice. Not sure there are other anesthesia residencies in "central california."

I hope you’re doing well. I wanted to share a great locums opportunity for a Board Certified Anesthesiologist in Central California starting mid-July and ongoing into 2026.

Assignment Details:

  • Schedule: Monday–Friday, 7:00 AM – 5:00 PM
  • Call: 1:5 weeknight call (call takers needed); weekend call optional
  • Setting: Main OR, Endoscopy, and some OB cases
  • Responsibilities: Supervising residents while also handling your own cases
  • EMR: Cerner
This is a solid long-term opportunity with a balanced case mix and consistent schedule.

If you’re interested or would like more details, feel free to reply to this email or give me a call—I’d be happy to discuss further.

Jackson Parker| 678-277-3068| [email protected]

Thank you,

I prefer doing my own cases. Sacramento would be a 90minute to 2 hour drive for me each way. Id consider it and stay at a hotel if the rate was much higher than 400. 400 rate can easily be had in the bay area itself.
My priorities are:

1) convenience
2)rate

If inconvenient then the rate better be higher. I am still getting 120 hours a month or more a month at 400/hr.
I want more income but can settle for 40-50k a month working 2-3weeks a month during weekday daylight hours only.
 
I know Kaiser SF has been hiring locums via Coker/Jackson. Not sure if they're still onboarding more. I was advertised $350/hr 1099.
Thats a a low rate.
SF is a pain to get in and out of. unless you live in SF, it is very inconvenient.
Ucsf is always looking and they advertise 375/hr.
400/hr I have and get 120 hours or more each month. I want more income. Can be higher rate or more hours or ideally both. Lol.
I do my own cases and prefer not supervising.
 
We don’t do cars. Our lawyers told us not to. We can deduct mileage if we travel from one site to another on the same day which is very rare.
Anyways. That’s why you really do not want to work with Envison team health unless it’s offering you something in return like time off or 2 guranteee non clinical days. Something. But the daily grind with 8 week of vacation plus everything taxed at 50% with California is stupid

No real benefit except to exposed all ur w2 income to federal and state income taxes and very little pretax deduction.
 
Thats a a low rate.
SF is a pain to get in and out of. unless you live in SF, it is very inconvenient.
Ucsf is always looking and they advertise 375/hr.
400/hr I have and get 120 hours or more each month. I want more income. Can be higher rate or more hours or ideally both. Lol.
I do my own cases and prefer not supervising.
120 hr a month isn’t great for 1099 work. Steady. But not great. You want 120 hrs a week.
 
120 hr a month isn’t great for 1099 work. Steady. But not great. You want 120 hrs a week.
I want half of that a week. 50-60hrs a week. Unless it’s a low volume place with no ob. in my opinion weekday daytime work is 400-450/hr. Nights weekends summer and holidays should pay much more.
 
I want half of that a week. 50-60hrs a week. Unless it’s a low volume place with no ob. in my opinion weekday daytime work is 400-450/hr. Nights weekends summer and holidays should pay much more.
Agree. Daytime places that are super busy solo 12 hrs a day can be brutal at 60 hrs a week.

Nights and weekends /low volume are generally my target.
 
Thats a a low rate.
SF is a pain to get in and out of. unless you live in SF, it is very inconvenient.
Ucsf is always looking and they advertise 375/hr.
400/hr I have and get 120 hours or more each month. I want more income. Can be higher rate or more hours or ideally both. Lol.
I do my own cases and prefer not supervising.
Like you, I prioritize convenience over rate, and my San Francisco city gigs are very easy for me to get to. I have not seen that rate for UCSF, and I know people who are working there on a per diem basis for 275 an hour, W-2. (I realize per diem rates and locum‘s rates might be different). Either way, the Ucsf positions are meat grinders. Running four rooms in different parts of the hospital with extremely sick patients.
 
We don’t do cars. Our lawyers told us not to. We can deduct mileage if we travel from one site to another on the same day which is very rare.
If your employer (your group) has a written policy requiring employees (you) to maintain a home office as a condition of employment, then cars are very much on the table and well within the bounds of acceptable practice.
 
Thank you,

I prefer doing my own cases. Sacramento would be a 90minute to 2 hour drive for me each way. Id consider it and stay at a hotel if the rate was much higher than 400. 400 rate can easily be had in the bay area itself.
My priorities are:

1) convenience
2)rate

If inconvenient then the rate better be higher. I am still getting 120 hours a month or more a month at 400/hr.
I want more income but can settle for 40-50k a month working 2-3weeks a month during weekday daylight hours only.
I do a fair amount of side work in the Bay Area and have not seen a rate of 400 an hour 1099, but I would be interested if you are willing to share the gravy!
 
If your employer (your group) has a written policy requiring employees (you) to maintain a home office as a condition of employment, then cars are very much on the table and well within the bounds of acceptable practice.

This is correct. Everyone does this. Easily justified if you cover more than one site. Plus I don’t think the IRS will go after you for such a small amount.

Only if your accountant is super conservative.

I never worked for envision.

We’re a 100% physician owned group. Like all business owner/employees we are allowed to have tax deferred 401k, profit sharing, and CBP plans and we have all 3 because we’re not stupid.

If the corporate structure is set up correctly, even a hospital owned group should be able to do this. My hospital owned practice has a 401K, CBP, and a HSA. Was pretty important when I looked for jobs.
 
This is correct. Everyone does this. Easily justified if you cover more than one site. Plus I don’t think the IRS will go after you for such a small amount.

Only if your accountant is super conservative.



If the corporate structure is set up correctly, even a hospital owned group should be able to do this. My hospital owned practice has a 401K, CBP, and a HSA. Was pretty important when I looked for jobs.
When the old M.A.C anesthesia practice sold out to Sheridan (aka Amsurg/envisjon) back around 2013

I highly doubt the “new” employees of Sheridan in 2014 had any of the same pretax options as the original M.A.C practice.

“
By all accounts, MAC is a well-respected and highly successful anesthesia practice, with more than 100 physicians — shareholders, non-shareholders, and independent contractors — who provide anesthesiology services to five hospitals and 23 ambulatory surgery settings in northern California. So why did this group decide to sell?”





Definitely would factor into job considerations the tax hit working for Sheridan/Envison in California with its high state income taxes
 
If your employer (your group) has a written policy requiring employees (you) to maintain a home office as a condition of employment, then cars are very much on the table and well within the bounds of acceptable practice.


Yes, my friend’s group does this.
 
Advertisement - Members don't see this ad
When the old M.A.C anesthesia practice sold out to Sheridan (aka Amsurg/envisjon) back around 2013

I highly doubt the “new” employees of Sheridan in 2014 had any of the same pretax options as the original M.A.C practice.

“
By all accounts, MAC is a well-respected and highly successful anesthesia practice, with more than 100 physicians — shareholders, non-shareholders, and independent contractors — who provide anesthesiology services to five hospitals and 23 ambulatory surgery settings in northern California. So why did this group decide to sell?”





Definitely would factor into job considerations the tax hit working for Sheridan/Envison in California with its high state income taxes
My guess would be the senior partners taking a nice lump sum for selling their shares to Sheridan and getting ready for retirement. The junior guys got nothing
 
My guess would be the senior partners taking a nice lump sum for selling their shares to Sheridan and getting ready for retirement. The junior guys got nothing
But the other factor is being employed by Sheridan as a true “w2” with almost all w2 income subjected to 50% California state and federal income taxes and Medicare taxes and Obamacare taxes after 500k.

That’s gotta be a horrible feeling working for 50 cents on the dollar after 500k instead of getting to shield it via defined benefits plan and letting it grow tax free. Which Sheridan didn’t offer.