- Joined
- Jan 31, 2017
- Messages
- 143
- Reaction score
- 95
Last edited:
You forgot abhorrent politics of their parent organization.I know that LUCOM doesn't get much love on SDN. The two major reasons I find are:
1. New school
2. Strict rules
Assuming I'm okay with the fact that it's a new school and assuming I'm okay with the rules, are there any other major negative points I should be concerned about?
I didn't realize that private, off-campus drinking, premarital sex, and homosexuality are unprofessional.Do we have a code of conduct? Yes, but it's more about emphasising professionalism than it is shoving strict religious mores down the students' throats.
I didn't realize that private, off-campus drinking, premarital sex, and homosexuality are unprofessional.
I don't disagree that LUCOM has a right to make these rules, but I think they're pretty clearly religious values rather than basic professionalism, and applicants should be aware that they extend beyond that.As someone who went to an undergrad with these same rules all I can say is that the expectations are very clear before someone even applies. It's not about professionalism as it is underlying religious belief, and when you go to or even apply to a religious institution then you sign up for what that means. If you don't want to live the rules then don't apply, it's really that simple. Or someone can decide that they are willing to comply for the 4 years they are in school.
Yep, this. Policing sexual orientation is not about professionalism. Don't kid yourself.I didn't realize that private, off-campus drinking, premarital sex, and homosexuality are unprofessional.
I don't disagree that LUCOM has a right to make these rules, but I think they're pretty clearly religious values rather than basic professionalism, and applicants should be aware that they extend beyond that.
No horse in this race but are you going to stand your ground and not buy and or use Dubin's EKG book once you get into med school?
Willing to wager a large sum of money you will, which then begs the question: are you ok with giving money to a pedophile?.
Planning to take Evolution as my Upper Division req. Gone get rekt when they see my transcript.Their UG teaches that young Earth creationism is the most likely explanation for our world's existence and the diversity of life, which suggests they're not interested in providing a strong science education.
This thread just reminds me of in college how the students that would fail a class would say "that professor is horrible"... it's all what you make of it. I would attend here tomorrow if they offered an acceptance and I think the majority of individuals whom really want to become a physician would say the same.
Are you a current med student there? Because from what i've heard their medical school is different than their undergrad institution.Ehrm...not quite. No one here has gone to Liberty and failed out, we simply have problems with the parent organization (and rightly so) as well as the teaching of young earth creationism to their undergraduate students. Heck, I'd go as far to say that I would expect a better business education from Trump University than I would an undergraduate biology education from LU.
That being said, as a private instution it is still their right to do so. If LUCOM was an applicants only acceptance, then I can see why one might reconcile their own beliefs temporarily to meet the outrageous rules of LU's community in order to become a physician. But do not say that critics of LU are just bitter pre-med students who would attend if they had to. That is not the case, and saying so lessens valid concerns about both LU's curriculum and the beliefs of the religious zealots who founded it
Where on the list of importance for residency programs is where you went to school? Just curious.
@AnatomyGrey12 Above board scores and clinical grades? I'm just wondering if two students are competing for a residency spot but the one who went to LUCOM has the higher board scores and clinical grades over someone who went to, say ATSU, who would get in?
For DO schools it doesn't matter.
Sorry can you clarify what doesn't matter?
I plan to pursue rural FM or IM in the NW.
So since many of the faculty and professors don't believe in the common basic concensus of evolution, does this worry anyone about how they value the rest of the science taught?
Yes teaching evolution has nothing to do with learning medicine, but does knowing that you're education comes from such a place that doesn't believe in it make it laughable?
Like if I went to that school and got the same board score as another candidate for a residency position, is there any chance that I won't be taken seriously and be less competitive because of it?
For the non-Christians here, do you think the belief (or disbelief) of a school could affect your education?
So since many of the faculty and professors don't believe in the common basic concensus of evolution, does this worry anyone about how they value the rest of the science taught?
Yes teaching evolution has nothing to do with learning medicine, but does knowing that you're education comes from such a place that doesn't believe in it make it laughable?
Like if I went to that school and got the same board score as another candidate for a residency position, is there any chance that I won't be taken seriously and be less competitive because of it?
For the non-Christians here, do you think the belief (or disbelief) of a school could affect your education?
I do not think that religion has anything to do with education or quality of education.
I think education depends on institution, professors, standards, values, mission, finances to provide necessary means for quality education.
Quite many famous scientists, who were also religious, lead to many significant discoveries.
When science does not go into religion and religion does not go into science both perform quite well.
Science is science, religion is a religion.
So since many of the faculty and professors don't believe in the common basic concensus of evolution, does this worry anyone about how they value the rest of the science taught?
Yes teaching evolution has nothing to do with learning medicine, but does knowing that you're education comes from such a place that doesn't believe in it make it laughable?
Like if I went to that school and got the same board score as another candidate for a residency position, is there any chance that I won't be taken seriously and be less competitive because of it?
For the non-Christians here, do you think the belief (or disbelief) of a school could affect your education?
Can you get kicked out for being gay? Isn't that discrimination?I didn't realize that private, off-campus drinking, premarital sex, and homosexuality are unprofessional.
You mean for becoming one during the school there?Can you get kicked out for being gay? Isn't that discrimination?
Ehrm...not quite. No one here has gone to Liberty and failed out, we simply have problems with the parent organization (and rightly so) as well as the teaching of young earth creationism to their undergraduate students. Heck, I'd go as far to say that I would expect a better business education from Trump University than I would an undergraduate biology education from LU.
That being said, as a private instution it is still their right to do so. If LUCOM was an applicants only acceptance, then I can see why one might reconcile their own beliefs to temporarily meet the outrageous rules of LU's community in order to become a physician. But do not say that critics of LU are just bitter pre-med students who would attend if they had to. That is not the case, and saying so lessens valid concerns about both LU's curriculum and the beliefs of the religious zealots who founded it
That's funny because I can think of 6 people of the top of my head who have graduated from LU undergrad for biology and are all going to some top tier schools. Kind of a very blind statement for you to make about a program only based off the fact that they teach creation, and they also do teach evolution they just do not endorse the ideas of it. But it's okay that you only get a single perspective on the creation of the Earth, I forget how well rounded that makes you.
evolution is a theory and creationism is a theory.There are no "perspectives" on evolution and the origin of the planet. There is what is right and what is wrong. I think teaching creationism as an alternative to evolutionary theory is absurd, and I would hope that anyone entering a scientific field such as medicine would believe the same.
please don't act like those two uses of the word "theory" have any similarities. Let me rephrase then: one is based on mountains of corroborating scientific evidence, and one is notevolution is a theory and creationism is a theory.
There are no "perspectives" on evolution and the origin of the planet. There is what is right and what is wrong. I think teaching creationism as an alternative to evolutionary theory is absurd, and I would hope that anyone entering a scientific field such as medicine would believe the same.
I agree to some extent, but for the purpose of this forum I am not going into more detail.please don't act like those two uses of the word "theory" have any similarities. Let me rephrase then: one is based on mountains of corroborating scientific evidence, and one is not
Science is an open exchange of ideas and thought and there is never a right or wrong it's either 0.0001% or 99.999%. Anyways, I think it's a wonderful opportunity if they teach both perspectives because it forces you to think critically. Do you really think that all the professors there believe in creationism? I wish I had a class where I could learn both perspectives and engage in debate and discussion. Maybe if this happened all of our CARS scores would go up.
I agree to some extent, but for the purpose of this forum I am not going into more detail.
Again, I think people should decide where they want to study. If people feel themselves more comfortable in these kinds of institutions. let it be. I am ok with that.
I understand that, and I am fully willing to engage in debate productive discussion as well. However, believing that the earth is 5000 years old and that we walked with dinosaurs is simply incorrect and not the grounds for such productive discussion.
I also dont care what percentage of the professors prescribe to such beliefs. I stated earlier that my main problem with LU is with the parent organization/the Fallwells, a point that thenewyorker1995 conveniently left out