Please elaborate
Accidentally accepted students have no legal case no make.
1) every medical school always has some written policy and/or student handbook that reserves the right to rescind any acceptance specifically written in vague language so it can be broadly applied. A simple letter retracting announcement to all these incorrectly accepted students will be sufficient
2) if a student tried to sue, the above will be held up in court, especially if none of these acceptances had been reported to AMCAS within Mayo’s own system. This would be deemed a communication error snd nothing more
They can try, but Mayo will always have "acceptance can be rescinded at anytime" no matter what action the applicant took
They would have to prove damages.And what if people rescinded other acceptances or interviews which people in the thread have already done in the interim. Can they sue for damages?
Say someone withdrew from other schools because of this (it is their top choice, etc etc), then they find out the rescinded offer. They then email the withdrawn schools, who won't take the applicant back. Is this grounds for damages?They would have to prove damages.
How would someone show damages? I really don't want to venture into playing armchair lawyer. The point is moot, because Mayo has a perfect defense.Say someone withdrew from other schools because of this (it is their top choice, etc etc), then they find out the rescinded offer. They then email the withdrawn schools, who won't take the applicant back. Is this grounds for damages?
This isn't me, but it looks like one or more on the Mayo thread has withdrawn II or As because of this...
Holy moly.It appears that Mayo (MN campus) accidentally accepted a huge number of applicants in their portal (far too many for the class size), which sent an automatic "accepted" email at the same time. There is some speculation that those who received the email are actually all those who were supposed to be on the waitlist or rejected. In any case, it's chaos on the Mayo MN thread--it looks like some people got the email and immediately cancelled other interview invites, withdrew from other schools, announced the good news to their friends and family--only to find out (or not yet, if they're not SDN) that it was a mistake. Meanwhile, the admissions committee has remained completely silent on the problem. They are probably trying to sort it out right now, but people are saying it is extremely unprofessional to not send at least a "bear with us through this unfortunate mistake" email. No one is sure what is going on or what happens next.
Did you actually??? If so, I might too. With a fake email of course..I didn’t apply but I’m emailing them too maybe I’ll slip thru the CRACKS!
I mean, some schools are known not to give much financial aid. And some people are wealthy enough to not really care about financial aid. If you get into a T10 and you’re fairly certain you won’t be going to Podunk U paying full COA, it makes sense to withdraw. The blame falls solely on the admissions office here for this enormous blunder.I am no way defending Mayo as they themselves should get mollyrocked for both the situation itself and how they handled it, but I am very confused at to how some people made such an impulsive decision to withdraw from EVERYTHING immediately like what? Not gonna play the financial aid matching game or anything?
Always been paranoid something like this would happen so I’ve been waiting til the actual “commit to enroll” deadline where I can actually see it and select the school itself.
Did you go to law school? I did. Mayo is not off the hook if they told someone who reasonably relied on an offer of admission to their detriment. Mayo is not free to screw up other peoples lives. Applicants who turned down other offers of admission, especially if those offers came with significant merit aid, could get that case to a jury. Boiler plate warnings in admissions materials aren't a license damage others. See the law of products liability.Any plaintiff have to show the following in order to win
1) They would have to show significant negligence on the part of Mayo. An email glitch /error would not rise to that level
2) they would have prove actual damages and loss of an opportunity as opposed to incurring actual money would not fly
3) they would have show that the mistakenly accepted students actions would be so direct and timely to negligent behavior that it would impact. Since final acceptance is not until April 30th, that PTE to any school isnt until by April 15th, according to guidelines, that most students with multiple acceptances are still holding all of them, this would be a high bar to get past a jury.
Now, you could try to sue for psychological damages of pain and suffering but that may take 3-5 years to get to trial. And if you were accepted to medical school in the meanwhile your case would be weak indeed
Did you go to law school? I did. Mayo is not off the hook if they told someone who reasonably relied on an offer of admission to their detriment. Mayo is not free to screw up other peoples lives. Applicants who turned down other offers of admission, especially if those offers came with significant merit aid, could get that case to a jury. Boiler plate warnings in admissions materials aren't a license damage others. See the law of products liability.
They can try, but Mayo will always have "acceptance can be rescinded at anytime" no matter what action the applicant took
Any plaintiff have to show the following in order to win
1) They would have to show significant negligence on the part of Mayo. An email glitch /error would not rise to that level
2) they would have prove actual damages and loss of an opportunity as opposed to incurring actual money would not fly
3) they would have show that the mistakenly accepted students actions would be so direct and timely to negligent behavior that it would impact. Since final acceptance is not until April 30th, that PTE to any school isnt until by April 15th, according to guidelines, that most students with multiple acceptances are still holding all of them, this would be a high bar to get past a jury.
Now, you could try to sue for psychological damages of pain and suffering but that may take 3-5 years to get to trial. And if you were accepted to medical school in the meanwhile your case would be weak indeed
Did you go to law school? I did. Mayo is not off the hook if they told someone who reasonably relied on an offer of admission to their detriment. Mayo is not free to screw up other peoples lives. Applicants who turned down other offers of admission, especially if those offers came with significant merit aid, could get that case to a jury. Boiler plate warnings in admissions materials aren't a license damage others. See the law of products liability.
Did you go to law school? I did. Mayo is not off the hook if they told someone who reasonably relied on an offer of admission to their detriment. Mayo is not free to screw up other peoples lives. Applicants who turned down other offers of admission, especially if those offers came with significant merit aid, could get that case to a jury. Boiler plate warnings in admissions materials aren't a license damage others. See the law of products liability.
Regardless of whether lawsuits get involved, you can bet that Mayo has their lawyers on retainers ready to go, since the unfolding of this email travesty.
What’s possible and plausible are two different things though.... let’s be real hereDid you go to law school? I did. Mayo is not off the hook if they told someone who reasonably relied on an offer of admission to their detriment. Mayo is not free to screw up other peoples lives. Applicants who turned down other offers of admission, especially if those offers came with significant merit aid, could get that case to a jury. Boiler plate warnings in admissions materials aren't a license damage others. See the law of products liability.
Ntm rescinding an acceptance happens generally bc the applicant did something to deserve it not they just ended up on the receiving end of something horrible....What’s possible and plausible are two different things though.... let’s be real here
Financial damages could easily be $5k for primary and secondary apps. More for flight and hotel.not a lawyer but I think they would have a case because the withdrawal is due to negligence on the part of the school that caused real financial damages to the applicant. Key would be negligence...
Happened at Cooper this year tooThis happened at cooper last year. Happens. It is quite unfortunate.
Has happened at Stanford as well.This happened at cooper last year. Happens. It is quite unfortunate.
I would encourage any applicant in this situation who has the means to consult with an attorney to do soFinancial damages could easily be $5k for primary and secondary apps. More for flight and hotel.
This doesn't include emotional damages.
Holy sh--, if every applicant did this, Mayo would have to pay hundreds of millions in damages. We need to get a sue Mayo thread started!
I would encourage any applicant in this situation who has the means to consult with an attorney to do so
THIS. This could be an entire thread. Ways to improve the medical school admissions process such that it works reasonably well for both applicants and adcoms.I am disappointed in medical admissions teams for expecting us to bend over backwards to gain admission and not even being semi-professional with us in return.
THIS. This could be an entire thread. Ways to improve the medical school admissions process such that it works reasonably well for both applicants and adcoms.
Step one: any amount of mutual respect
The scripted responses + emails to falsely accepted applicants should be a given. They should be extremely responsive to inquiries from students on dealing with the aftermath of withdrawn interviews and acceptances elsewhere, including providing proof of their mistake if needed.What would mutual respect look like in the event of a technical error? Seems to me that the scripted responses to the applicants + email is all you could really do.
If these are all applicants you interviewed. If I was part of an adcom on a school and interviewed these people - call every single one of them and make sure if they need correspondence that we will do the best that they can.What would mutual respect look like in the event of a technical error? Seems to me that the scripted responses to the applicants + email is all you could really do.
Wow two years in a row?Happened at Cooper this year too
They did individually call everyone, too. And asked if they had made any changes to other applications (ie withdrawing, canceling interviews) and if so, they were willing to help.If these are all applicants you interviewed. If I was part of an adcom on a school and interviewed these people - call every single one of them and make sure if they need correspondence that we will do the best that they can.
but I’m not part of an adcom.
Worst case scenario, an applicant is unable to secure admission at any other school after declining acceptance even with Mayo's endorsement to said med school. Do you sue, wait 3 to 5 yrs for a decision, (which you might lose), or reapply? If you got accepted once, you likely can be successful as a re applicant with a real life story to tell. Lastly, Mayo will have very capable high priced lawyers, will the applicant have the same? It is not so much about being right, but who has the right lawyer. I'm betting it all works out without lawsuits.Applying the law of product liability would be a difficult to make as would any case concerning a direct or implied contractual obligation. . There is no evidence that this was intentional on the part of school for this error, nor is it likely to show any widespread negligence that an error like this should have been reasonably expected. Since the main product/service of the medical school is to provide education, the withdrawing of the initial agreement to offer the opportunity does not a) show any liability due to the impact of the product/service (ie education had not begun) and b) does not, again, have a actual direct cost to the withdrawal. That is, no monies already spent, with the exception of application fee and travel costs for interview, have been spent.
Now as to the question that the plaintiff lost other opportunities and made decisions based on information sent in error, getting damages on say lost future earnings would be difficult. The contractual analogy would be buying a house or any real property. While the seller and buyer may make an initial agreement, it usually takes weeks for an actual contract, filled with conditions and exceptions, to be signed and weeks more to be executed. If the seller reneges, the potential buyer cannot, for example, sue based on what a projected future resale value on this house. Likewise, an applicant who has made decisions based on this communication error cannot sue based on what they would have made as a physician.
This would even be an more difficult argument to make for two additional reasons. First, this isnt some uneducated consumer being guided by a "boiler-plate" agreement. It is a highly educated, intelligent applicant who would have been expected to understand the terms and conditions of applying to any individual medical school. They would have completed out primary and multiple secondary applications, and with the level of competency that would be expected from an applicant to medical school, it is a reasonable expectation that they knew or should have known the terms and conditions of doing so. The second reason this would be difficult is that a medical school is not trying to make a profit but has a mission to serve the public good by training prospective physicians, a mission that deals with life and death. This would require that any alleged negligence, product liability, or failure to fulfill a contract rises to the level of such an egregious act as deserving a legal remedy.
Now, as I said in my first post, can an applicant sue for pain and suffering, thus looking for either damages on lost future earnings, psychological pain, and/or punitive damages. Well they can certainly try. However, if they were to reapply and get accepted elsewhere over the 3-5 years it may take to for this action come to trial, it would severely weaken any argument they have.
Lastly, over shadowing all this, is whatever state action that is brought has a path for federal review. This is because all medical schools are accredited by LCME, which is appointed effectively as the agent for the HHS to oversee allopathic medical schools for the purposes of accreditation. This would include their admission policy, their process to do so, and above all, their mission. Again, that very high bar to show such an egregious action would be hard to reach.
Thank you for letting you know you went to law school. One does not simply have to go to law school, but actually earn a degree and pass the bar. Or perhaps they need to sue under product liability showing fault in their service to produce a competently educated attorney
I think it's a generational thing with so many being taught that whenever adversity arises, adopt a victims mentality. You cant have any ownership in the adversity. Refuse to be a victim and you wont be one.I seriously question the emotional development/ability to handle disappointment in premeds. There’s something wrong with either the process or the way kids are being brought up. Maybe both. Seriously, talks of lawsuits over an honest mistake?
Dude, these people may have pulled out of other acceptances/invites , potentially totally forking over their chance at starting med school this year over some ridiculous circumstance they can't have anticipatedI think it's a generational thing with so many being taught that whenever adversity arises, adopt a victims mentality. You cant have any ownership in the adversity. Refuse to be a victim and you wont be one.
And Mayo said they would help them get re instated. Several Adcoms said they would endorse the readmission status of students affected by this. I dont think there will be much collateral damage as opposed to the worst case scenario I described aboveDude, these people may have pulled out of other acceptances/invites , potentially totally forking over their chance at starting med school this year over some ridiculous circumstance they can't have anticipated
Oh I was talking about legal action for the worst case scenario onlyAnd Mayo said they would help them get re instated. Several Adcoms said they would endorse the readmission status of students affected by this. I dont think there will be much collateral damage as opposed to the worst case scenario I described above
Did you go to law school? I did.