- Joined
- Aug 22, 2006
- Messages
- 5,820
- Reaction score
- 17
Is it your position then that nobody in your osteopathic med class failed to get an MD acceptance and just fell backwards into a DO program? Because I have a feeling that this is pretty common among DO programs. Please, please correct me if I am wrong (but only using actual verifiable stats, not "well my adviser says...").
Of course these folks exist. 🙄 I can't say what portion of the total population of matriculants they make up, however. I can't find any data on that. I think motivation can be difficult to assess.
I think a lot of DO students are like are OP... kinda clueless about the DO until they realize that they might not make it into an MD program. This is his/her first step and there will be many more along the way to his/her route to a DO acceptance letter (should that happen).
I agree that this happens.
An [sic] just for the record, were there a polygraph hooked up to DO applicants when asked "Why D.O.?" many would answer "I couldn't get into an MD program."
That's conjecture and hypothetical. Until you actually do this, it's arguable.
I'm not bashing DOs... but we all know this is the truth, whether it hurts or not. I will have no qualms in my future career working with DOs, and I will treat them as equal to my MD counterparts. But the truth is the truth -- DO schools are WAY easier to get into than MD schools, so just let it go.
Well, you may not be directly bashing DO's, but there may be a subtle tone of condescendence in your post. That's fine. I suspect that this thought pattern is not at all unique. I won't hold it against you.
I appreciate your thoughtfulness, however, I don't need your "charity," or your promise to treat me as an equal. I know that I am at least equal and all of the states acknowledge that as well. 🙄
As to your assertion of osteopathic medical schools being easier to get into than allopathic medical school, there is some truth to that. If you compare just average MCAT/GPA of all osteopathic and all allopathic matriculants, then yes, allopathic matriculants have higher statistics. However, also keep in mind that allopathic medical schools had 30,853 more applicants (a total of 39,108 for 2006) than osteopathic medical schools (8255, for the 2005-6 entering class) [1, 2]. It is possible that having more applicants can drive up average statistics. That said, I should also point out that the ratio of matriculant to applicant is about the same for osteopathic and allopathic medical schools, 45.34% (3743 matriculants for the 2005-6 entering class) and 44.42% (17,370 matriculants for 2006) respectively [1, 2]. Make of this what you will, but they both seem highly competitive, with less than half of applicants matriculating.
Lastly, while MCAT and GPA are certainly crucial to the admissions process, they are certainly not the end-all in the process. Eventually, all schools look at the entire file. There are many more factors that go into the process than just those numbers and many factors that go into deciding whether an applicant can make a successful medical student and someday a successful physician. I'm not an adcomm member, but that's what I suspect.
Anyway, we are just about getting to the place where this becomes a tired argument, so I'm going to stop now. Suffice it to say that we may have disagreements.