MPH Fall 2015: Applied, Accepted, Waitlisted, Rejected!

This forum made possible through the generous support of SDN members, donors, and sponsors. Thank you.
Everyone,
I would like to start a Columbia MPH 2015 thread. Is there one already or should I make one?
Im going there with a concentration in Sociomedical Sciences, so lets make one.
I have some questions
 
Everyone,
I would like to start a Columbia MPH 2015 thread. Is there one already or should I make one?
Im going there with a concentration in Sociomedical Sciences, so lets make one.
I have some questions

There's already one. It's called Columbia mph admitted 2015
 
I think there's some basis for it in terms of getting one's foot in the door. However the benefits of attending a highly ranked or prestigious school disappear instantly and completely the first day you show up at the job. At that point, it's time to deliver. If you don't get the job done, no school name or ranking will save you. Conversely, if you're good, no one will care about the fact you went to a school they never heard of.

Some people hope to secure a lucrative 40-year career at the age of 26 by way of the school they graduate from. It doesn't work that way. Long and fruitful careers are still created the way our parents and grandparents created them: By consistently producing year in and year out, decade after decade. In that sense, getting into a good school and getting hired is the easy part...
I wholeheartedly agree which is why I don't put that much weight on rankings alone, I have more of a holistic approach. I compare rankings, location, tuition/potential for debt, research opportunities and post grad employment together. Like you said I think a name can certainly open doors but I also think you can go to a lesser known institution and bust your ass and get those same opportunities or comparable ones at least. Its about just making the most of your opportunities and taking initiatives. Like you said, no name or ranking will save you once you start that job. its all about productivity.
 
I think there's some basis for it in terms of getting one's foot in the door. However the benefits of attending a highly ranked or prestigious school disappear instantly and completely the first day you show up at the job. At that point, it's time to deliver. If you don't get the job done, no school name or ranking will save you. Conversely, if you're good, no one will care about the fact you went to a school they never heard of.

Some people hope to secure a lucrative 40-year career at the age of 26 by way of the school they graduate from. It doesn't work that way. Long and fruitful careers are still created the way our parents and grandparents created them: By consistently producing year in and year out, decade after decade. In that sense, getting into a good school and getting hired is the easy part...
Thank you for this.


you guys and this ranking nonsense omg.

Did you look at the NRC rankings? They are comprehensive and rank the quality of the PhD programs in epi. This is important as it sheds light on the quality of research and epi curriculum specifically. I want to do research, so it's important for me to go somewhere with great research opportunities. Not sure why that is nonsensical.

Obviously I've taken a very holistic approach to this if you would like to look at my notes. It's one piece of the puzzle and not one to ignore, as I trust the NRC's methodology is fleshed out moreso than mine.
 
If you do the teaching English abroad for a year, and apply broadly next fall while abroad, you'll probably get into some pretty good schools, as well as some of the same schools from this cycle. Some schools like to see work experience post undergrad, and this will help your application. However, the only small drawback is that this isn't strictly public health related work, the teach English abroad, though it will generally help your public health application this fall. If you want to do it, then by all means, do it. If you go down the public health route in the longterm, you might not have a chance to do something like this again.

I think that the online programs are mostly geared for working professional who already have a good sense of what public health is about, and that it is better for entry level MPH students to go to a brick and mortar school.

Thanks! You're totally right. In reapplying I will focus more on health disparities, so Spanish will be useful at least. (My final goal is a PhD in medical anthropology, so it'll help for that too.) I've never liked the idea of online schooling anyway. I am definitely thinking about deferring at GW and maybe just reapplying really early ( like 1st week SOPHAS is out) next cycle. And I'll by narrowing down my choices to maybe 3 schools. I'm fresh out of college, so a year off might be good.
 
***Side Note NOT to Turn into a Discussion: For those who thinking ranking doesn't matter; please be mindful of those of us who do find it of utter importance. Everyone has their own goals, priorities and reasonings for entering the MPH arena . I personally find it insulting for anyone to disregard my personal discretion for it. I also do not find it forum appropriate to put down anyone for it; if you don't like something you see move on to the next comment. And I will leave my two cents at just that.
If this was supposed to be a response to my "ranking nonsense" u could have addressed me directly and not use some passive aggressive beat around the bush approach. My comment was not putting down anyone, I don't know how you interpreted it as such but that was not my intent (again if your little "side note" was addressing my comment). I don't get how or why you are insulted about something that doesn't remotely appear as a "dig" in my opinion.. what are u gonna do when u are in your mph program and someone says something comparable to what I said? Get insulted? u will be butt hurt all the time if that's the case. u cant take it to heart dude. We all have our own opinions as you pointed to, who cares what I think? Seriously. I'm one person. I was merely pointing to the fact of how each ranking system uses a different criteria, which is what I meant when I said "nonsense". I wasn't saying paying attention to rank itself was nonsense, just that each organization (or whomever is providing the ranking list) places certain weight on things and its just silly in my opinion to think that one list could really encompass all the criteria one looks at when determining how highly regarded an institution is or should be. ITs impossible ! We all care about rank to a certain degree, but Its all subjective. You may care more about a certain criteria than I or anyone else, just like these organizations providing the ranks, so each list is going to be different.
And the reason I chose to respond to this despite your comment appearing to not want any response was because I don't like the idea of my words being misinterpreted because it seems as if you (and anyone else) took that statement the wrong way and that was not my intent. As u stated if you don't like a comment move on to the next one, you appeared to not like mine yet you took the time to get all passive aggressive and type a "side note not to turn into a discussion". My opinion doesn't matter, I'm not some world renowned PhD researcher where u should even put weight on what I'm saying or actually get insulted by what I'm saying (imo).
 
Thank you for this.




Did you look at the NRC rankings? They are comprehensive and rank the quality of the PhD programs in epi. This is important as it sheds light on the quality of research and epi curriculum specifically. I want to do research, so it's important for me to go somewhere with great research opportunities. Not sure why that is nonsensical.

Obviously I've taken a very holistic approach to this if you would like to look at my notes. It's one piece of the puzzle and not one to ignore, as I trust the NRC's methodology is fleshed out moreso than mine.
Not denying that they are comprehensive (see the tail end of my most recent comment in response to orchid) or not important, I was just noting the subjectivity that's all. I saw your notes actually and they were pretty damn good imo. Again I wasn't saying looking at rankings themselves is nonsense, I was saying it is basically impossible for every ranking system to encompass all the things we all want, and that is what is nonsense. It's crazy that these ranking people think their ranks specifically are gods gift to man. Each ranking system puts weight on whatever they want to. So NRC may appear really comprehensive to you while to someone else it may be missing a certain criteria. It has subjectivity, which isn't a bad thing because we all inherently value certain criteria differently.
 
  • Like
Reactions: KPZ
If this was supposed to be a response to my "ranking nonsense" u could have addressed me directly and not use some passive aggressive beat around the bush approach. My comment was not putting down anyone, I don't know how you interpreted it as such but that was not my intent (again if your little "side note" was addressing my comment). I don't get how or why you are insulted about something that doesn't remotely appear as a "dig" in my opinion.. what are u gonna do when u are in your mph program and someone says something comparable to what I said? Get insulted? u will be butt hurt all the time if that's the case. u cant take it to heart dude. We all have our own opinions as you pointed to, who cares what I think? Seriously. I'm one person. I was merely pointing to the fact of how each ranking system uses a different criteria, which is what I meant when I said "nonsense". I wasn't saying paying attention to rank itself was nonsense, just that each organization (or whomever is providing the ranking list) places certain weight on things and its just silly in my opinion to think that one list could really encompass all the criteria one looks at when determining how highly regarded an institution is or should be. ITs impossible ! We all care about rank to a certain degree, but Its all subjective. You may care more about a certain criteria than I or anyone else, just like these organizations providing the ranks, so each list is going to be different.
And the reason I chose to respond to this despite your comment appearing to not want any response was because I don't like the idea of my words being misinterpreted because it seems as if you (and anyone else) took that statement the wrong way and that was not my intent. As u stated if you don't like a comment move on to the next one, you appeared to not like mine yet you took the time to get all passive aggressive and type a "side note not to turn into a discussion". My opinion doesn't matter, I'm not some world renowned PhD researcher where u should even put weight on what I'm saying or actually get insulted by what I'm saying (imo).


It was a general comment to the public. Looks like you may be the only individual who's taking this personally and getting vehement about it. I didn't read beyond the first sentence . Have a good day.
 
It was a general comment to the public. Looks like you may be the only individual who's taking this personally and getting vehement about it. I didn't read beyond the first sentence . Have a good day.
not vehement just wanted to make sure if you were offended by response i made it clear that wasn't my intent. I had a disclaimer if your comment was addressing me specifically, that is my response. if not then obviously who cares.
 
Slightly confused by the NRC rankings. According to that list, what are the top 10 epi programs? Thanks!
 
Is anyone else going to Accepted Applicant Day at UMD-College Park on March 27?
 
To be honest, he was stating this to the general public. He did not mean it in any negative way... Sure this interpretation may seem like its targeting any individual person, but he means only good thoughts and positive vibes. Peace.

If this was supposed to be a response to my "ranking nonsense" u could have addressed me directly and not use some passive aggressive beat around the bush approach. My comment was not putting down anyone, I don't know how you interpreted it as such but that was not my intent (again if your little "side note" was addressing my comment). I don't get how or why you are insulted about something that doesn't remotely appear as a "dig" in my opinion.. what are u gonna do when u are in your mph program and someone says something comparable to what I said? Get insulted? u will be butt hurt all the time if that's the case. u cant take it to heart dude. We all have our own opinions as you pointed to, who cares what I think? Seriously. I'm one person. I was merely pointing to the fact of how each ranking system uses a different criteria, which is what I meant when I said "nonsense". I wasn't saying paying attention to rank itself was nonsense, just that each organization (or whomever is providing the ranking list) places certain weight on things and its just silly in my opinion to think that one list could really encompass all the criteria one looks at when determining how highly regarded an institution is or should be. ITs impossible ! We all care about rank to a certain degree, but Its all subjective. You may care more about a certain criteria than I or anyone else, just like these organizations providing the ranks, so each list is going to be different.
And the reason I chose to respond to this despite your comment appearing to not want any response was because I don't like the idea of my words being misinterpreted because it seems as if you (and anyone else) took that statement the wrong way and that was not my intent. As u stated if you don't like a comment move on to the next one, you appeared to not like mine yet you took the time to get all passive aggressive and type a "side note not to turn into a discussion". My opinion doesn't matter, I'm not some world renowned PhD researcher where u should even put weight on what I'm saying or actually get insulted by what I'm saying (imo).
 
Slightly confused by the NRC rankings. According to that list, what are the top 10 epi programs? Thanks!


I'm confused too! I wish I could help out :/ for me most HMP/HPM/HPA lol the health policy categories are missing so I was wondering if it's even a complete list
 
Last edited:
I'm confused too! I wish I could help out :/ for me most HMP/HPM/HPA lol the health policy categories are missing so I was wondering if it's even a complete list


According to the NRC list, the top ten epi programs (using the high R-Rank) are:
1) Harvard 2) Berkeley 3) Yale 4) UW 5) Michigan 6) Pitt 7) UNC 8) UCLA 9) Minnesota 10) UC-Davis (12-Columbia, 15-Emory)

A quick glance at PhD rankings for fields I'm a bit more knowledgeable of leaves me comfortable disregarding these Public Health rankings when they aren't reaffirming (although I certainly acknowledge their limited and/or comparative/situational value).
 
According to the NRC list, the top ten epi programs (using the high R-Rank) are:
1) Harvard 2) Berkeley 3) Yale 4) UW 5) Michigan 6) Pitt 7) UNC 8) UCLA 9) Minnesota 10) UC-Davis (12-Columbia, 15-Emory)

A quick glance at PhD rankings for fields I'm a bit more knowledgeable of leaves me comfortable disregarding these Public Health rankings when they aren't reaffirming (although I certainly acknowledge their limited and/or comparative/situational value).

Agreed. Very odd rankings. Maybe includes research being done outside of school of public health? Still, having JHU and Emory is very surprising (and wrong??).
 
Need help. Emory or Yale? I know a lot about Emory and love it but everyone thinks I'm crazy to turn down an Ivy. Please share your thoughts. I'm all about which school gives me more opportunity for success during and after my MPH?
 
Need help. Emory or Yale? I know a lot about Emory and love it but everyone thinks I'm crazy to turn down an Ivy. Please share your thoughts. I'm all about which school gives me more opportunity for success during and after my MPH?

I would choose Yale in not just a heart beat, but a [ (heart beat) / 10^9 ]

Yale is Uber bougie
 
I may have missed it earlier, but what's your concentration? Just because Yale is Ivy League doesn't necessarily make it a better school or choice for you.

Need help. Emory or Yale? I know a lot about Emory and love it but everyone thinks I'm crazy to turn down an Ivy. Please share your thoughts. I'm all about which school gives me more opportunity for success during and after my MPH?
 
I may have missed it earlier, but what's your concentration? Just because Yale is Ivy League doesn't necessarily make it a better school or choice for you.
That's my point too. However nobody seems to agree which concerns me. My concentration is Social and Behavioral Sciences. Its not Epi or anything so im sure that matters in terms of rankings. Anyone have any real perspective to share?
 
Last edited:
Just saying that Emory is ranked higher and their BSHE department is top notch. I know many graduates who have gone on to do great things. Plus the CDC has an amazing Health Communications department, if that's what you're interested in. People are too attached to status. As someone else mentioned, going to an Ivy League or top college/university might give you the upper hand at the beginning, due in partly to your alumni network and other societal factors. However when it comes down to it, it's all about having your degree, experience, and accomplishments to show for it. As someone who has managed interns, I can honestly say that my interns who went to less ranked universities/colleges, were actually a lot more hard working, driven and focused than their counterparts who went to top schools. A name can only get you so far. If you have nothing to contribute, good luck in life (not to you, in general). I hope this helps!
 
Need help. Emory or Yale? I know a lot about Emory and love it but everyone thinks I'm crazy to turn down an Ivy. Please share your thoughts. I'm all about which school gives me more opportunity for success during and after my MPH?


I'd break it down and see which school has your short/long-term choices. If you want to go based on rank/elite Emory is ranked higher overall (never understood why Yale isn't up there). But they're both great choices so I wouldn't base it purely on status.


Breakdown courses, opportunities, career placement/employment post-graduation, research if you're required/interested maybe there's a project you want to get your hands on, affiliations, financial/scholarship burdens of relief, GSI/TA, practicum (in-state, WW, faculty to help you) etc...

Yes a good name may help you get into the door but the rest of the hustling is on you
 
Just saying that Emory is ranked higher and their BSHE department is top notch. I know many graduates who have gone on to do great things. Plus the CDC has an amazing Health Communications department, if that's what you're interested in. People are too attached to status. As someone else mentioned, going to an Ivy League or top college/university might give you the upper hand at the beginning, due in partly to your alumni network and other societal factors. However when it comes down to it, it's all about having your degree, experience, and accomplishments to show for it. As someone who has managed interns, I can honestly say that my interns who went to less ranked universities/colleges, were actually a lot more hard working, driven and focused than their counterparts who went top schools. A name can only get you so far. If you have nothing to contribute, good luck in life (not to you, in general). I hope this helps!
Thanks for the response. I did read the comment earlier about a top school just getting you in the door but substance is what will determine success. I agree however I think that also depends on the individual not the school. I'm sure all PH schools are good enough to teach smart kids all about public health. The difference in experience and education comes down to how we personally use our time at the school to take advantage of opportunities. So personally because I'm a smart girl (I thinks so anyway) I think I will be successful at both schools. My questions is more about how will an MPH from Yale compare to an MPH at Emory assuming similar research work at both schools.
 
If you're looking at current public health professionals, you will see that a large portion of them have their MPH from Emory, Hopkins, Harvard, UNC, etc. I see a lot more graduates from Emory RSPH working for major public health organizations, when compared to Yale. Also, you should probably consider where you want to settle after graduate school. If NYC and Boston are ideal choices for you, then I'd say probably go to Yale. If you want to be in DC or Atlanta, then I'd say Emory.
 
If you're looking at current public health professionals, you will see that a large portion of them have their MPH from Emory, Hopkins, Harvard, UNC, etc. I see a lot more graduates from Emory RSPH working for major public health organizations, when compared to Yale. Also, you should probably consider where you want to settle after graduate school. If NYC and Boston are ideal choices for you, then I'd say probably go to Yale. If you want to be in DC or Atlanta, then I'd say Emory.
Good point. I love Emory and have had success with my undergrad degree. I have always pictured myself at Rollins but my mentor (Rollins grad)and others have said to explore Yale. I want to do that but I want to understand why. Is it only for the name ? I'm concerned that must be it because of the rankings.
 
You cannot go wrong either way. It all depends on your personal preference. So you did your undergrad at Emory? If you're happy there and like the Atlanta area, then I'd say just stay there. I mean having the CDC, CARE, American Cancer Society, The Carter Center, and many other public health organizations literally in your backyard is a huge plus. I do not think you will have the same opportunities during the academic year at Yale, that you will have at Emory RSPH. I'd say don't let others, including me and the other posters on this forum, influence your overall decision. Did you apply to other schools? UNC and Columbia also have amazing Social and Behavioral departments.

Certainly do not let your academic advisors sway you if they're unable to provide sound evidence as to why Yale is a better choice. If it's based solely on the name and reputation as an Ivy league institution, then that's not enough ground to go to Yale.

Good point. I love Emory and have had success with my undergrad degree. I have always pictured myself at Rollins but my mentor (Rollins grad)and others have said to explore Yale
 
If you're looking at current public health professionals, you will see that a large portion of them have their MPH from Emory, Hopkins, Harvard, UNC, etc. I see a lot more graduates from Emory RSPH working for major public health organizations, when compared to Yale. Also, you should probably consider where you want to settle after graduate school. If NYC and Boston are ideal choices for you, then I'd say probably go to Yale. If you want to be in DC or Atlanta, then I'd say Emory.
Thanks for the info. I know from past posts I have read you haven't enjoyed your time at Tulane. I was accepted but honestly stopped considering the school when I got into Rollins and GW. Partly because some of your comments. This is also why I'm nervous about choosing. On one hand Emory is great and I am comfortable here. What if I decide on Yale and hate it. That's my fear.
 
You cannot go wrong either way. It all depends on your personal preference. So you did your undergrad at Emory? If you're happy there and like the Atlanta area, then I'd say just stay there. I mean having the CDC, CARE, American Cancer Society, The Carter Center, and many other public health organizations literally in your backyard is a huge plus. I do not think you will have the same opportunities during the academic year at Yale, that you will have at Emory RSPH. I'd say don't let others, including me and the other posters on this forum, influence your overall decision. Did you apply to other schools? UNC and Columbia also have amazing Social and Behavioral departments.

Certainly do not let your academic advisors sway you if they're unable to provide sound evidence as to why Yale is a better choice. If it's based solely on the name and reputation as an Ivy league institution, then that's not enough ground to go to Yale.
Yes I got into GW, Tulane, Emory and Yale. Rejected from Columbia. Emory and Columbia were my top 2 choices
 
Everyone's experience is different here, as can be said with any institution one chooses to go to for undergrad and graduate school. You must not go into the situation with a mindset like that. You have to choose the option that provides the best benefits and least risks. There's always going to be flaws, though as long as we can see through the negative and appreciate the positives of the program, then you're golden. I agree that my experience, from a social standpoint, at Tulane has not been the ideal. Though from an academic standpoint, I'm super impressed with the professors and quality of academics here. I hope this helps!
 
Yes I got into GW, Tulane, Emory and Yale. Rejected from Columbia. Emory and Columbia were my top 2 choices

Hi, I am surprised that you got into Yale but not Columbia. I got into Columbia but not Yale & Harvard.
Strange how these things work out.
 
Hi, I am surprised that you got into Yale but not Columbia. I got into Columbia but not Yale & Harvard.
Strange how these things work out.
I agree. I noticed a lot of more people were rejected from Yale but accepted at top schools. I think Yale is much smaller than Columbia. I reread my SOP for Columbia and it wasn't very good so I think that's why they rejected me. Lol
 
There are a lot of factors that go into an admission decision. While grades and GRE/MCAT/other test scores are very important, work experience and subjective factors, such as people who are reviewing your application, could influence the way your decision will turn out. Either way, you both got into some great schools and will be successful in public health no matter where you attend.

Hi, I am surprised that you got into Yale but not Columbia. I got into Columbia but not Yale & Harvard.
Strange how these things work out.
 
Does anyone know how to find out where alumni from a particular program are working?
 
Does anyone know how to find out where alumni from a particular program are working?


That should be available on the SPH web-page under Alumni.

Another thing I did tbh lol was use LinkedIn. I just entered the degree/university name in the search engine and clicked on random people one-by-one to see what and where everyone's work history has been.
 
That should be available on the SPH web-page under Alumni.

Another thing I did tbh lol was use LinkedIn. I just entered the degree/university name in the search engine and clicked on random people one-by-one to see what and where everyone's work history has been.

Thanks! I've been trying to use LinkedIn but it's just giving me current students, not alumni.
 
Thanks! I've been trying to use LinkedIn but it's just giving me current students, not alumni.

Hmmm I wish I could help with that one. Everyone I'm getting is alumni. But we have different searches because of our connections.

Maybe try using the word alumni? Or even if you want to use the actual name/position of the company I also did that since I know what I want to go into
 
Hmmm I wish I could help with that one. Everyone I'm getting is alumni. But we have different searches because of our connections.

Maybe try using the word alumni? Or even if you want to use the actual name/position of the company I also did that since I know what I want to go into

Thank you so much for your help! I don't think LinkedIn is going to work for me so I just emailed the departments (the information isn't posted on their pages).
 
I am in the HPM concentration. I am debating between Columbia and UCLA at this point. I am originally from Northern California so LA and NY have been the two locations I would want to live in. I do want to find a job in California after graduate school. AHHH I'm torn between the two schools :/ How about you what schools are you deciding between?

P.S. I ate around Sawtelle and it seemed like a great place to live in. I have no clue about the prices for apartments. I guess if I decide to go to UCLA then I should find some affordable studios:/

I think the comparison list Orchidmph made in one of the comments above is a great place to compare the pros and cons of attending each school, unless you already made one and are just down to choosing one over the other! I only applied to three schools/four programs, all in SoCal, because I already knew I would want to stay in Cali after grad school. Couldn't afford to apply to more..and am seriously blessed that got into any!!! I got accepted in UCI and UCLA (Asian Am/MPH CHS), but I am definitely choosing UCLA, given that it was my top choice, it's in LA, the joint program, the MPH program vs UCI's program, etc. I would assume rent would be comparably the same between Irvine and Westwood though...

Sawtelle seems the best choice for me so far! The grad complex brwnyeydRA referred to is University Village apartments, which is only for grad students with families I think. There should be an easier way to compare housing options and finding roommates ): I hope you're able to make a confident choice for your program!
 
Hey guys! Can anyone give an insight to the Dartmouth mph program? Iv been accepted at BU, UTSPH and Dartmouth. Leaning towards Dartmouth vs BU. Need help deciding. All views will be very much appreciated thanks.
 
Need help. Emory or Yale? I know a lot about Emory and love it but everyone thinks I'm crazy to turn down an Ivy. Please share your thoughts. I'm all about which school gives me more opportunity for success during and after my MPH?
I'm going through the same exact dilemma right now also. They're both incredible schools and I'm torn between them for Epi of infectious disease. Honestly, this may sound ridiculous but I'm not incredibly comfortable with saying Yale's name or going there because it is an Ivy league. It comes with certain expectations from people that aren't true for the public health program. While the undergrad has an acceptance rate of 8%, their public health is closer to 34%. And that's not something people outside of the public health community would know. Also I am worried about interacting with people of the other graduate schools, Law and Med, particularly. Those schools are some of the most difficult to be accepted into in the country and I worry that may come with a bit of arrogance from the students within those programs. I don't want to go to a school where I feel inferior to the other programs going on around me. I want to be in an area where I feel comfortable meeting new people.
And on the point of future degrees, from what I can tell, One would have equal opportunities at either school. They both have an immense amount of funding and ties and great faculty. This does not help make a decision but it may help you feel better that you can't go horribly wrong at either school.
 
Last edited:
Hey guys! Can anyone give an insight to the Dartmouth mph program? Iv been accepted at BU, UTSPH and Dartmouth. Leaning towards Dartmouth vs BU. Need help deciding. All views will be very much appreciated thanks.

I don't know about the other schools but Dartmouth is known for their Health Policy research at the Dartmouth Institute. So if that's what you like, you can't go wrong with it!
 
Hey! I'd like to start a new thread "Johns Hopkins MPH- 11 month 2015". I don't think there is one yet. Do enlighten me, in case there is one.
 
I'm going through the same exact dilemma right now also. They're both incredible schools and I'm torn between them for Epi of infectious disease. Honestly, this may sound ridiculous but I'm not incredibly comfortable with saying Yale's name or going there because it is an Ivy league. It comes with certain expectations from people that aren't true for the public health program. While the undergrad has an acceptance rate of 8%, their public health is closer to 34%. And that's not something people outside of the public health community would know. Also I am worried about interacting with people of the other graduate schools, Law and Med, particularly. Those schools are some of the most difficult to be accepted into in the country and I worry that may come with a bit of arrogance from the students within those programs. I don't want to go to a school where I feel inferior to the other programs going on around me. I want to be in an area where I feel comfortable meeting new people.
And on the point of future degrees, from what I can tell, One would have equal opportunities at either school. They both have an immense amount of funding and ties and great faculty. This does not help make a decision but it may help you feel better that you can't go horribly wrong at either school.
I'm not concerned about the other students at all. If they are there for law or business odds are they have no clue about PH. I love Emory and would be happy to stay. I just want to make sure it's the best decision
 
So I have a last-minute question regarding a fellowship offer. On Saturday morning (3-14), I received a call from a faculty member offering me a fellowship that would reduce my out of state tuition significantly my first year at one of my top 3 programs. She told me that I would have to accept this offer by Monday, tomorrow, 3-16, by noon. Crazy quick turn around.

I have only heard about funding and financial aid from one other program at this point, and I am a little concerned about accepting an offer when I don't know what is on the table from other schools. I am also a bit confused about why they would have to know so soon when you aren't supposed to accept or decline until April 15th.

Does anyone have any advice about how to navigate this situation?


Undergrad School:
small midwest liberal arts
Undergrad GPA: 3.3
Major/Minor: psychology and english
GRE: 164 V, 161 Q, 4.0 W
Experience/Research (please, be brief): 2 years undergrad psych research, 2 years post-grad public health work

Accepted: UIC (MCH Epi), Tulane (MCH), Emory (Epi), UNC (MCH), JHSPH (Global pop.), Colorado (MCH), UMN (MCH epi)
Rejected: Harvard, UC Berkeley (MCH)
 
So I have a last-minute question regarding a fellowship offer. On Saturday morning (3-14), I received a call from a faculty member offering me a fellowship that would reduce my out of state tuition significantly my first year at one of my top 3 programs. She told me that I would have to accept this offer by Monday, tomorrow, 3-16, by noon. Crazy quick turn around.

I have only heard about funding and financial aid from one other program at this point, and I am a little concerned about accepting an offer when I don't know what is on the table from other schools. I am also a bit confused about why they would have to know so soon when you aren't supposed to accept or decline until April 15th.

Does anyone have any advice about how to navigate this situation?


Undergrad School:
small midwest liberal arts
Undergrad GPA: 3.3
Major/Minor: psychology and english
GRE: 164 V, 161 Q, 4.0 W
Experience/Research (please, be brief): 2 years undergrad psych research, 2 years post-grad public health work

Accepted: UIC (MCH Epi), Tulane (MCH), Emory (Epi), UNC (MCH), JHSPH (Global pop.), Colorado (MCH), UMN (MCH epi)
Rejected: Harvard, UC Berkeley (MCH)




Question: what happens if you accept and then decided to reject the offer later on? If you're denying the school together I don't think they're able to hold that against you anymore lol right?
 
Top