- Joined
- Jun 14, 2005
- Messages
- 3,379
- Reaction score
- 393
If you are including OMD's then probably the reimbursements would go down. But the fact of the matter is that whenever there is an annouced decrease in the reimbursment for the ophthalmologic codes, the American Ophthalmology Association, and the American Optometric Association go to Congress to make sure it doesn't happen. In one year they turned a proposed double digit decrease into a slight increase. Other times they are not as sucessful, but to my knowledge Congress has never said anything about how much Dr. Smith at Wal-Mart charges when negotiating.
Yes....I understand that. I also understand that even if every single commercial OD charged $120 for a comprehensive eval, it would NOT make reimbursement from any 3rd party go up. I just think that those commercial docs will be seeing a lot less patients, and the refracting opticians will move in.

Thank you! I am glad to see that my point was not lost. For the record, I dislike corporate optometry, but I do not dislike corporate optometrists. This is why I continue to confront some posters when they attack the OD's. I've noticed that Watson has done the same on ODwire and I completely agree with him. The problem is not the OD's. This mode of practice is not going away. The problem is the number of graduates which appears to be increasing. You want to blame someone, lay off the corporate OD's and attack the schools. For those of you that think we have a nationwide oversupply problem today, imagine what would happen if every current corporate doc (not to mention all of the future grads) went into private practice tomorrow.
