Lindy, first I must commend you on your maturity. Most people on this board have one opinion and are so ardently steadfast on it that no rhyme or reason changes their mind. You on the other hand are open to discussion--a breath of fresh air, to say the least.
Lindyhopper said:
That is great to hear. I admit I was just speculating. It was largely based on one women's SDN posts. She went for being so optimistic to being so bitter in about a year and a half. It just seems so sad that it may have skewed my perspective.
Is the woman you are refering to Elysium? Because I agree her posts are rather bitter. But if you can imagine yourself in her shoes, where medical school didn't work quite the way you had hoped, well you would be slightly peeved too, wouldn't you?
Lindyhopper said:
But I really don't buy the "well rounded, looking past the numbers, etc." They're less selective. I think this will pretty much inevitably lead to more weak candidates.
These are REAL students:
Student 1 at BU Med:
Very high undergrad GPA: 3.8+ with Biochem major
Below average MCAT: ~28
Barely passing Step 1:~180-190
Class standing: At the bottom of class (barely passed second year)
Did not take any time off--one of those gunner pre-meds who went straight into medical school because that is what she was supposed to do. Now regrets not taking time off and feels trapped.
Student 2 at NYMC
Average GPA: ~3.5
Below average MCAT: 29
High Step 1: 235
Class standing: In the middle of the class and is planning on doing Rads
Took 2 years off just because it "felt right" and wanted to grow up more and become "well rounded."
Student 3 at LECOM
Average GPA: ~3.5 Religion Major
Way below average MCAT: 24
High Step 1: Unknown, but matched allopathic Rads.
Took around 4 years off, got a masters, did research, etc etc. I would call her "well rounded" with tons of life experience. She took the MCAT 3 times and applied to medical school 3 times.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
My point is that there IS value to "well rounded" students and from my experience, they tend to be more "put together" and able to handle stress. Now of course this is not a hard and fast rule, but there are significant amounts of benifits that people just don't recognize.
Student 1 (now a 3rd year) has told me that she has trouble impressing attendings on the floor.
While student 2 has been "high passing" and "honoring" all his 3rd year rotations and is constantly complimented by attendings about his ability to handle patients.
I could go on and on with actual students and their stats, but I won't. I just hope people understand that there are qualities and attributes that can not be quantified, but still exists, and can really help the student shine in the long run.