Sorry about the length of this post, but a few of us opened a can of worms here and I can not resist the opportunity to expound. However, much of it cannot be adequately addressed in a forum such as this. But, I have some serious time on my hands, so I am would like to add some ideas to think about. Just maybe someone is bored enough to read it.
To start, assuming this information about opening a new school is true, VA Tech and Blacksburg is a great place. ...And that is assuming it is going to have a mission statement similar to the West Virginia and Pikeville School...not quite as focused though. I doubt their Appalachian requirement will be as strict...being associated with a major university they will be able to attract a larger applicant pool with other interests. The location is prime though...for many reasons already stated.
Danugget: I think you are being a little VA TECH. It might not be UVA, but it is a solid, nationally ranked, second tier school.
Liljoe2002: I agree with this point. Wyoming, Alaska, Montana and Idaho do not have their own medical schools per se. Although, they are part of the WWAMI program through the University of Washington. The program was designed to recruit students from these states and then have them return to underserved areas. The students attend basic science classes at their perspective state schools, eg. U of Alaska, Wyoming, Montana, etc. They then move to U of Wash for MS II and then go on to do MS III and IV training in community settings throughout the Northwest and Alaska. An Osteopathic School would do wonders for the region as well. Especially if it was modeled after Pikeville and had a regional orientation.
Groundhog: Your damn straight it is
. It has an awesome programs, which is very regionally structured to recruit from certain states (aka WWHAMI, see above). It has done wonders for primary care in the Northwest and Alaska.
Regarding
PGY2?s comments, I have a few of my own. Since my opinions are always a work in progress, I welcome any responses.
As medical students, you are not looking further into the future regarding what your work environment is going to be like by the time you graduate from residency. Right now, you are only focused on passing your classes and board exams.
For the sake of argument, lets just agree to disagree on this point. That description does not fit everyone. I am a very forward thinker and have put much thought into this; my experience and personal relationships have helped to refine my plans to this point. For the record, even with all of the controversy that goes into doing so, I did choose D.O. first. With that said, even though I get a little boisterous on this site, I doubt I will ever fit into the ?diehard osteopath? category. My whole personality, in addition to many thoughts, does not even come close to coming out in my posts.
I am now in my 2nd year of residency and the future is looking pretty bleak regarding working conditions for most docs coming out of residency. Much of this can be attributed to managed care but another factor fueling this is that the supply of physicians in and around large cities outweighs the demand.... Most people, especially young physicians want to live in areas close to family and in places that offer entertainment suitable for younger people (larger cities).... When you're in your final year of residency and looking for a job, you'll wish there was a shortage of physicians because the job opportunities, especially in primary care are not that inviting at this time.... Then you'll be wishing they would stop opening all these new medical schools.... You may think I am being selfish, but when you try to raise a family, buy a house, and pay off your med school loans you'll wish you never became a doctor. Picture yourself at the end of residency, 11 years of post high school education, with $200k in student loans, a mortgage, and a kid on the way, and the best offer you get is working 80 hours per week for $90,000/year. No thanks! And to avoid this, what do most medical students end up doing? They stray away from primary care and end up subspecializing.
Correct me if I am wrong, but many of the things you point out in this quote as well as the ones below, personify what is wrong with our health care system and past medical education models. The worst thing that ever happened to healthcare in this country is it became a BUSINESS. From physicians, to hospitals to pharmaceutical and equipment companies, everyone saw it as a way to make the big bucks and be in a prestigious profession. Policy for most of the century drove the price of health care beyond the reach of many and lead to disparities in care, as well as this seriously mucked up imbalance of physicians we have. We are the only industrialized country on the planet that does not have enough primary care physicians. Why is this? Because, of many of the reasons you already pointed out...as well as fifty years of bad government policy, misguided lobbying of the AMA and the way that medical schools trained doctors, among others. It is a nasty uphill battle we have to climb to fix the mess.
Although managed care is a broken solution to a huge problem, it is rooted in good theory. We need to get back to the basics and find a balance between preventative, primary, emergency and specialty care. This is tough though. Our system has evolved to favor the production of specialty physicians. To make matters worse, we have to overcome the ?primary care physicians are lesser physicians? stigma that exists in this country. Moreover, we need to close the salary gap in order to recruit more physicians into primary care. IMHO, there are only a few organizations that have a clear grasp on the subject. Among them are the American Medical Student Association, the American Public Health Association and the authors of Healthy People 2010. Our health care system is seriously dysfunctional. Everyone is clearly in agreement with this. The knife-fight is in the details of how best to fix it. I am a big fan of some of the recent proposals for National Health Insurance (see
www.apha.org or
www.congress.gov for a concise summary). For this to work though, most insurance companies will have to die and there will be a painful transition for the highest paid physicians, as well as the pharmaceutical and equipment companies.... basically all the powerful ones getting rich off of the business of medicine and those very well represented by lobbyist groups.
And not to open a new debate, how many osteopathic physicians end up practicing osteopathy in their practices? How about less than 10%! Why is this? First, it is very difficult to be reimbursed for this and second, it takes too much time! Half of my residency class is from osteopathic schools, none of them incorporate or are even interested in utilizing these skills.
Your percentages and anecdotal evidence is not well supported. The most recent survey I saw in a JAOA article that quoted a survey taken by an independent agency stated that 89% of D.O.s incorporate OMT into their practice (National study of the impact of managed care on osteopathic physicians,
http://www.aoa-net.org/Publications/JAOA/jaoa.htm). I will assume that this is to different degrees. Of the hand full of D.O.?s I know, they all use it.... except for the ER DOCS and a few other subspecialists...only on occasion. However, when I asked them about it they usually say something like ?my style of practice incorporates many other aspects of OP&P.?
As far as having it paid for, the article, in addition to my own anecdotal evidence states that it is much easier to get insurance to pay for it, or collect a fee-for-service payment, than it is to get an MCO to do so. My response to that is ?no big surprise.? I am in an HMO--which is supposed to be a good one; after all, it is the one used by University Health System employees--and it sucks. When my appendix ruptured, I went through an 8-month nut-roll to get them to pay for my treatment. It was missed on my initial visit to the emergency room--which meant I had to pay the $50 copay/fine for going to the ER and not be admitted-- and when I went back I was too sick to call my PCP to get ?authorization? to be there.
As far as OMT goes, it is hard to get it approved. To make matters worse, my HMO does not recognize SPORTS MEDICINE as a specialty. I had a plaguing injury that I wanted a referral for but could not get it. My HMO does not allow fellowship-trained physicians to list themselves as sports medicine specialists; they must either be Orthopedic and Family Practice. To make matters worse, my PCP is not allowed to make referrals to FP-Sports medicine guys and sense there are no Ortho-Sports Medicine Docs on the plan, it is not an option. As far as PM&R goes, if you do not have a ?disabling injury? that causes you to miss work, it is tough to get a referral approved. My point is that HMO?s suck...it is not that they are anti-DO, that is certainly not the case, it is that they are excessively frugal and profit driven.
In fact, most of them are seeking allopathic fellowships in cardiology, gastroenterology, and heme/onc. Goodbye primary care! Most of them whom I've spoken with all admitted that the only reason they went to osteopathic school is because they didnt get into the allopathic schools they applied to. I can already see the onslaught of rebuttals that statement is going to generate, but I am only speaking from my own experience. And those of you who say you were accepted to allopathic schools and decided to go to osteopathic schools, well, the more power to you. Most people say that they just felt better, had a better "fit" at the osteopathic schools. But remember, medschool is only four years long, it may have been more advantageous to go to the allopathic school and suck it up for those four years than to have to put up with the bias so many complain of for the rest of their lives.... The whole DO/MD thing is a moot point to me because from my experience, they all end up practicing allopathic medicine in the end. Hey, how many of you who are already in practice (not including students) would voluntarily give up your DO title if they were offered the MD title like they did in california all those years back? The reason I exclude students from the question is because you havent been out there yet and experienced what the actual practice of medicine is like as a doctor. I am not intending to insult anyone by my post. We all went to medical school for the same reason, to become doctors and practice medicine. DO vs. MD route will still get you to the same place. Personally I wish they would give you the option to which degree you would prefer, that way all the die hard osteopaths would be satisfied and all the others who really wanted to MDs could have their wish too.
As far as this goes, I am going to respectively dismiss much of this as your opinion and agree to disagree. We all know people who would wait in line to debate your comments.
This does bring up another point that I have been surprised to learn over the last few years. ...We all know that many students ?settle? for their 2nd, 3rd, 4th...8th.... etc, choice when going to medical school. Whether it be MD or DO, medical school is very competitive and hard to get into. Being a little older and a tad more worldly, this topic makes me chuckle a bit. I compare it to someone making comments or complaining about the fact that they made it to the Olympics, competed with the best in the world and ONLY came away with a Bronze Medal. From my perspective, I would say a bronze medal is quite an outstanding accomplishment and something to be revered. ...Not everyone can go to Harvard (I personally would never want to) and in most cases, unless you have very specific career goals, it does not matter in the ?big picture? we call life; although for some, the ego/prestige factor is an almost overwhelming force.
This leads into my point, I was very surprised at all the unhappy medical students and residents I have come across the last few years. It is not uncommon at all for me to run into medical students who say their training sucks, etc, etc. Medical students can certainly B*tch with the best of them. In addition, a sizable minority of Residents I have met, have stated that if they had it to do all over again they would have done something else other than medicine. Allopathic students have repeated to me many of the complaints I see from D.O. students on this board, especially concerning clinicals. It is quite common to hear entirely different stories from people who did the same clinical rotation. I have come to think it is much like any training. Depending upon who your professor, preceptor or senior resident is, your training will vary greatly. With that said, there are improvements needed in osteopathic clinical and GME training and they are being arduously worked on. However, many of the same, as well as other unique problems exist in allopathic programs as well. Some hospitals have closed leaving students and residents scrambling for positions. MCP came very close to going bankrupt. UCSF went through a tough time in the late 90's as they were transitioning toward their goal of having 50% of their class enter a primary care field. As they shifted around clinicals and reallocated residency positions the backlash on students and residents got ugly. And let us not forget Stanford, who missed by one vote having the LCME place them in probationary status because of shortcomings in their labs, library etc.
The point I am taking away from this is, whether it be D.O. or M.D., you best work hard to find the best training opportunities you can and be prepared to be flexible. All programs have areas that need work or are going through growing pains. In clinicals some rotations will suck, some will be great...and that pretty much goes for any place with varying degrees of course. I guess as students, residents and physicians we must always continue to strive for improvement and reform. After all, many of the problems are a result of the ?system.? With that said, let us not forget the main purpose of everyone?s existence--the PATIENT.
So to summarize, you may want to increase the osteopathic exposure by opening more schools, but by fueling the unbalanced distribution of physicians around large cities, it may come back and bite you in the ass when it comes time to look for a job. I know it, I'm there going through it now.... Personally, I think medical schools are becoming like law schools, they are everywhere, based upon profits for the schools, and cranking out grads irrespective of the damage it is doing to the job market. One solution to the problem may be opening schools whose graduates are admitted based upon their commitment to provide services where they are needed (rural areas). This would only be successful if the financial burden was lifted from the shoulders of these students in the form of free education funded by Medicare or by the communities that will employ them.
Your points again highlight some of the fundamental problems with our health care system, as well as fallacies in our policies over much of this century. I agree with your proposal about ?looking for a certain type of applicant,? in addition to lifting the financial burden. Osteopathic schools and the allopathic schools that have made shifts toward primary care are doing the first part of this. It will have to accompany a lot of other serious health care reform though...and that is way too much to get into in any detail on this board.