- Joined
- Jan 17, 2001
- Messages
- 770
- Reaction score
- 53
Anyone have recommendations of SubI in the NY area? I am not speaking about big city programs but places that may take a DO with average steps and I can actually learn during SubI.
Impressive because its Winthrop... Nuff said.
So it's impressive that Winthrop residents match into Winthrop fellowships?
Your definition of impressive could use some adjustment.
'What kind of step one score would you need for 2-4?Columbia is #1 by far, the next 3 are dependent on what fellowship you are looking to land, malignancy, pt population etc. If you want GI I'd put Sinai #2, Heme/Onc Cornell #2, Cards NYU #2.
1)Columbia
2)Sinai (GI)
3)Cornell (Heme/Onc)
4)NYU (Cards)
Dude...enough. How many times are you going to ask this question? Just take your exam, get the best score you can and come back and talk once you've decided which specialty you want.'What kind of step one score would you need for 2-4?
'What kind of step one score would you need for 2-4?
Are you aware that most university programs would not touch IMG with a 10 inch pole? Even if they were ranked first at their med school, which collaborate closely to the universities sponsoring said programs, have very high USMLE scores, PhD and substantial publication record, without any gap in clinical education? The reason is that the program does not want to be seen as if they can't get enough AMG applicants.
Similarly, AMGs don't want to go to program with significant fraction of IMGs, so they are not seen as a failure by their peers.
In fact, while IMGs are the ultimate "untouchables", there are many more castes in the system. I just looked for instance at UPMC and Northwestern residency programs. There is not a single resident there from the top 10 med schools.
As result of these two forces there is a clear convergence towards segregation of programs into two types: exclusively AMG and exclusively IMG. And as it makes sense to question which AMG program gives better training, it makes sense to ask the same regarding the IMG programs. But probably this is the wrong forum to ask these question as AMGs are naturally unfamiliar with IMG programs.
P.S. I'm not even sure if comparison between programs belonging to different AMG castes (or leagues, as they are called here) makes any sense besides the community bias.
Hence there is a clear segregation
Can anyone comment on the current scene regarding Lenox Hill's IM residency. What are fellowship prospects like? I know they have some in-house ones. Thanks!
Split the difference geography-wise and go to John's of Bleecker St. instead.Downstate vs. Jacobi? If you could only interview at one (for scheduling reasons) which would you choose?
Downstate vs. Jacobi? If you could only interview at one (for scheduling reasons) which would you choose?
Actually, I picked John's of Bleecker St. And I wasn't kidding.Thanks for the insight guys. I read that whole thread about downstate from a little while ago. A little concerning to say the least.
Gutonc: Im surprised you would still pick downstate as you said it was a horrible place to be a resident.
Any insight into Jacobi? Seems like a good program on paper but I don't have much inside info on the program and not much on sdn.
lolActually, I picked John's of Bleecker St. And I wasn't kidding.
So now 2/2 Downstate grads who wouldn't choose Downstate at all if given the choice, would still pick it over Jacobi.I'd choose Downstate over Jacobi though.
So now 2/2 Downstate grads who wouldn't choose Downstate at all if given the choice, would still pick it over Jacobi.
Case closed.
There was a very brief period (2 or 3 years) when Conrad Fischer was the AssPD there, that Downstate grads thought it might be a good choice for them. I did not fall for that, and I actually have him to thank for that since he talked me out of even bothering to apply.Throughout the interview day at downstate I thought I was being punked. They didn't even try to fake it. Their whole deal is basically scooping up people who are desperate to be in NYC but are not competitive enough for the other 5 university programs. Of the small handful of residents I met at my interview at least a couple were downstate grads but I'm assuming they didn't exactly CHOOSE to be there.
Is that guy as obnoxious in real life as he is in the Kaplan videos? Gotta admit his teaching methods do work…sometimes.There was a very brief period (2 or 3 years) when Conrad Fischer was the AssPD there, that Downstate grads thought it might be a good choice for them. I did not fall for that, and I actually have him to thank for that since he talked me out of even bothering to apply.
As much as I like to talk s*** about the place though, the pathology is amazing, there were (my data is almost 10 years outdated at this point) some great teachers at the County, particularly in Renal, Cards and GI, and if your goal is a fellowship or die, you'll probably get one in house if you're willing to Chief up. It's definitely in the Top 5 University programs in NYC.
That joke would have been funnier I'd I could count to 6.Is that guy as obnoxious in real life as he is in the Kaplan videos? Gotta admit his teaching methods do work…sometimes.
I feel like when I had interviewed there one of the chiefs was saying he had failed to match. Don't remember in what field but talk about red flags!
Not sure if you were trying to make a joke but it's definitely not in the top 5 University programs in nyc…maybe 6th…out of six
Also pathology be damned. you can find "good pathology" at many places that will treat you more humanely.
Why? Bc he's vivacious? I thought he was really enthuasiastic in the Kaplan IM series. He makes quite a bit of bank working for Kaplan and writing board review books.That joke would have been funnier I'd I could count to 6.
And Fischer is a decent person, but he's bats*** crazy. That said, I did learn a lot from his weekly reviews while on medicine.
😵I think Jacobi gets a bad rep for not much good reason. It's a pretty decent hospital. House staff are friendly, will teach, lots of FMG, nurses are hit or miss, social work not so good just like any public hospital. Teaching is solid.
have you MET him?? agree with gutonc...Why? Bc he's vivacious? I thought he was really enthuasiastic in the Kaplan IM series. He makes quite a bit of bank working for Kaplan and writing board review books.
Try rounding with the dude.Why? Bc he's vivacious? I thought he was really enthuasiastic in the Kaplan IM series. He makes quite a bit of bank working for Kaplan and writing board review books.
275, minimum.
His enthusiasm gets old quick. That, and his repeated denial of evolution and preference for an almost Lamarck-ian natural selection during lectures. Definitely what you need to understand adrenal physiology.Why? Bc he's vivacious? I thought he was really enthuasiastic in the Kaplan IM series. He makes quite a bit of bank working for Kaplan and writing board review books.
You're just bitter that you got a 273 and didn't get invited.wrong. terrible advice. i have personally spoken to the PD. 276 is the threshold score for screening apps, but i have it on good faith they haven't accepted a candidate below 285 in the past 6 years. who knows though, if you score above 275 apply, you may have a shot
So you don't like him bc he believes in God?His enthusiasm gets old quick. That, and his repeated denial of evolution and preference for an almost Lamarck-ian natural selection during lectures. Definitely what you need to understand adrenal physiology.
I like how you're putting words in my mouth. I don't like him because he spends too much time not discussing the topic he should be and instead shouting about people running away from dinosaurs. I think the "Definitely what you need to learn adrenal physiology." makes that quite clear. Should I have mentioned his Shakespearean quotes instead? Maybe you'd say I don't like him because I'm a philistine. I don't care what he believes, it has nothing to do with my medical education.So you don't like him bc he believes in God?
He probably does it to intersperse fun in the videos. It's not meant to lecture but intersperse something different in which the subject matter is boring to learn from videos.I like how you're putting words in my mouth. I don't like him because he spends too much time not discussing the topic he should be and instead shouting about people running away from dinosaurs. I think the "Definitely what you need to learn adrenal physiology." makes that quite clear. Should I have mentioned his Shakespearean quotes instead? Maybe you'd say I don't like him because I'm a philistine. I don't care what he believes, it has nothing to do with my medical education.
And why is denying evolution = believing in God?
That's what I thought at first. But it's like watching a comedian at multiple shows. Once you realise it's the same joke over and over (and he covers so many topics), it grates on the ear. If you've watched his older videos where he teaches a live class, you'll appreciate his style much more, he really does engage the audience in those.He probably does it to intersperse fun in the videos. It's not meant to lecture but intersperse something different in which the subject matter is boring to learn from videos.
So he talks about evolution in different organ systems videos?That's what I thought at first. But it's like watching a comedian at multiple shows. Once you realise it's the same joke over and over (and he covers so many topics), it grates on the ear. If you've watched his older videos where he teaches a live class, you'll appreciate his style much more, he really does engage the audience in those.
He talks about that, he quotes Shakespeare, he screams randomly in the middle of videos. Even though I watched them at 2x it was not enough to keep it from getting to me at times.So he talks about evolution in different organ systems videos?
I guess if you're watching it at 2x then your purpose is different. I watched them at normal speed so the interspersed stuff was more a good memorable thing to put the information into memory for later retrieval. I find his healthcare views quite putting off, honestly. That would get to me more.He talks about that, he quotes Shakespeare, he screams randomly in the middle of videos. Even though I watched them at 2x it was not enough to keep it from getting to me at times.
He's entitled to his views, it was just going off topic to the same old things over and over that was annoying. I found that everyone speaks really slow at normal speed, I don't think I could sit through him chanting "salivation, lacrimation..." at that speed. And we learn to compartmentalise the politics of professional conversations, you just have to do the same while studying.I guess if you're watching it at 2x then your purpose is different. I watched them at normal speed so the interspersed stuff was more a good memorable thing to put the information into memory for later retrieval. I find his healthcare views quite putting off, honestly. That would get to me more.
So as a New Yorker and having gone through this very recently, I thought I would add my two cents about the NYC programs for the applicants this year. I've rotated at a few of them as a medical student. For the others, the information is from friends at the programs or from my interviews there, so definitely I don't pretend to know everything about these programs. I hope this can be a bit helpful for people applying to NYC this year. I've used their names as they appear in FREIDA, because many of these hospitals have many different programs listed, which makes things confusing. I've placed them in my own relative preference if I were ranking them again...
There are a million threads debating whether or not "Top" IM programs will accept DOs and the answer is generally no (although somebody will then come through with an exception that more or less proves the rule). You are not going to do IM at Columbia or Cornell or NYU (or Hopkins or Duke or MGH or...or...or...) as a DO grad...the end. Doesn't mean you can't get a great residency and fellowship in NYC (or preferably elsewhere...seriously, you don't want to do residency in NYC, never mind wind up there as an attending).
And no, don't wait. Matriculate this year. NYCOM is as good as it gets in the DO world (along with places like CCOM and PCOM) so if you don't get an MD acceptance, take the bird you have and run.
11. Albert Einstein College of Medicine (Jacobi) Program
What forum calls it: Jacobi
Fellowship: Poor
Scut: Medium
Workload: Medium
Location: Horrible
Comments: Just for clarification, this is one of the other Albert Einstein program. This is similar to BI, Lenox, and SLR, except there is more work, more scut, and its in the Bronx
that's great and all....but its not about 1 or 2 people a year going somewhere big....but how many applied AND got a fellowship spot....1 person applies and matched well , great...5 people apply and only 1 gets a spot (albeit a great spot)....not so great...
I am a Jacobi graduate and disagree with the above. Most of the Jacobi housestaff are very happy with the program and the amount of scutwork has been reduced a lot in the last 3 years. It is a respected program and graduates match well both within the AECOM system and in excellent outside institutions. The match list of a program that has sent cards fellows to places like UPenn, Columbia, Mt Sinai and Emory in the last 4 years alone is not "poor" IMHO.
that's great and all....but its not about 1 or 2 people a year going somewhere big....but how many applied AND got a fellowship spot....1 person applies and matched well , great...5 people apply and only 1 gets a spot (albeit a great spot)....not so great...
The other thing to consider in programs which are very IMG heavy is the background of the people who get fellowships - many IMGs have extensive training/research/experience/publications in their home country prior to starting residency here, which can make their fellowship match stats difficult to compare to others such as fresh AMGs. For example, the person who matched to cards at Colombia had previously completed a PhD in cardiovascular science at columbia prior to their jacobi residency. Ive also seen programs "advertise " cardiology matches for IMGs who were essentially attending cardiologists in their home country etc
This couldn't be farther from the truth. I'd say that DS students make anywhere from 20-35% of every class. I will grant you that it is rarely top choice, but outside of the other 5 academic centers, DS may be the best deal otherwise. It is an academic center in a great location (Brooklyn overall, not Flatbush, specifically), and plenty of fellowship opportunities w/ good in-house loyalty. You have to know what you're signing up for, but it is far from the horror story that it is often represented as on SDN.The most telling sign is that no Downstate medical students will stay there for IM residency.
Can that be said for any of the other med schools in NYC? Nope.