- Joined
- Jan 1, 2011
- Messages
- 38
- Reaction score
- 1
- Points
- 4,531
Any upcoming grads given job offers, is the pay more, about the same, less, or SIGNIFICANTLY less than you expected to be offered?
Please note if your response applies to retail or hospital, and if possible, what region of the country you are in.
Just wait for the tax man hit.
http://www.paycheckcity.com/cokronos/netpaycalculator.asp
Are you asking because you have an offer SIGNIFICANTLY less than you expected?
I will tell you new hospital pharmacists are starting at $100-101K at my hospital.
My uncle just showed me this website. It put a serious damper on my plans of getting an apartment in Gramercy (Manhattan) with a beautiful view of the NYC skyline. Rent was about $3000/month for a studio in a posh complex where Julia Roberts lives on the Penthouse floor. Ya, not gonna happen now. My friend who's an investment banker at Deutsche bank was saying it would be great. I forgot investment bankers who make investments for Arab sheikhs and princes make a lot more than pharmacists. 🙁
That website for me = "Welcome to the Republican Party."
My uncle just showed me this website. It put a serious damper on my plans of getting an apartment in Gramercy (Manhattan) with a beautiful view of the NYC skyline. Rent was about $3000/month for a studio in a posh complex where Julia Roberts lives on the Penthouse floor. Ya, not gonna happen now. My friend who's an investment banker at Deutsche bank was saying it would be great. I forgot investment bankers who make investments for Arab sheikhs and princes make a lot more than pharmacists. 🙁
That website for me = "Welcome to the Republican Party."
My uncle just showed me this website. It put a serious damper on my plans of getting an apartment in Gramercy (Manhattan) with a beautiful view of the NYC skyline. Rent was about $3000/month for a studio in a posh complex where Julia Roberts lives on the Penthouse floor. Ya, not gonna happen now. My friend who's an investment banker at Deutsche bank was saying it would be great. I forgot investment bankers who make investments for Arab sheikhs and princes make a lot more than pharmacists. 🙁
That website for me = "Welcome to the Republican Party."
The interesting thing is that higher incomes have a higher %. If it's a flat rate, higher earners still contribute more, but aren't punished. With the current system you could end up getting a raise and bringing home less money due to the income brackets.Whatever.
Plug in the same info for a $40k per year job (what many other people could expect to make) and see how you like it. It's not like pharmacists are the only ones paying taxes. It's a big bite of everybody's income, but that's because we're civilized and don't throw Grandma out on the street when all her relatives pass away and she can't afford her doctor's visits. We band together and help pay for her. Socialism? Maybe, but it's also the right thing to do.
Any upcoming grads given job offers, is the pay more, about the same, less, or SIGNIFICANTLY less than you expected to be offered?
Please note if your response applies to retail or hospital, and if possible, what region of the country you are in.
The interesting thing is that higher incomes have a higher %. If it's a flat rate, higher earners still contribute more, but aren't punished. With the current system you could end up getting a raise and bringing home less money due to the income brackets.
So when pharmacists say they're in the 35% bracket, their 100k isn't reduced to ~65k? I was not aware of that.This is a very common misunderstanding of our tax code.
We're taxed in "layers" of income. There is a base level, which is taxed at one rate. Your next layer up is taxed at a different rate, and then you might have even more layers on top, with higher rates. You cannot make more money and actually bring home less overall due to an income bracket. Read the layer cake analogy at the bottom:
http://www.marketplace.org/topics/elections/gop-contenders/week-review-romneys-159-tax-rate
So when pharmacists say they're in the 35% bracket, their 100k isn't reduced to ~65k? I was not aware of that.
http://www.moneychimp.com/features/tax_brackets.htm
Gives a very nice example. So on 100k, the effective tax rate is roughly 22%. Very interesting.
This is a very common misunderstanding of our tax code.
We're taxed in "layers" of income. There is a base level, which is taxed at one rate. Your next layer up is taxed at a different rate, and then you might have even more layers on top, with higher rates. You cannot make more money and actually bring home less overall due to an income bracket. Read the layer cake analogy at the bottom:
http://www.marketplace.org/topics/elections/gop-contenders/week-review-romneys-159-tax-rate
So when pharmacists say they're in the 35% bracket, their 100k isn't reduced to ~65k? I was not aware of that.
http://www.moneychimp.com/features/tax_brackets.htm
Gives a very nice example. So on 100k, the effective tax rate is roughly 22%. Very interesting.
It's not fair to count your tax deferred accounts as reducing your income. This is income you are choosing to defer until later, much like if you chose to put it in a savings account, except this is a savings account your employer likely matches, at least partially.
It definitely reduces "cashola".
Yes it is defered income and reduces taxes and is matched by my employer. That's why I do it! 🙂
Also have to subtract student loans from "cashola." In my case, $100K over 10 years = ~$1200/month.
Yikes, only $50,000 in cashola.
Still gotta eat too. 🙁

This is a very common misunderstanding of our tax code.
We're taxed in "layers" of income. There is a base level, which is taxed at one rate. Your next layer up is taxed at a different rate, and then you might have even more layers on top, with higher rates. You cannot make more money and actually bring home less overall due to an income bracket. Read the layer cake analogy at the bottom:
http://www.marketplace.org/topics/elections/gop-contenders/week-review-romneys-159-tax-rate
Took the words out of my mouth (or keybord).
There is a significant difference between the "tax bracket" that an induvidual falls under versus the effective tax rate that person pays. Most pharmacists fall under the 28% tax bracket. They aren't paying 28% in federal income taxes.
Sorry to get off topic.
I agree. But there is also Social Security/Medicare Taxes, State Income taxes and some municipalites also levy an income tax. It is a fair argument to say that total taxation is in the effective 25-30% ballpark; because I pay ~28% in total taxation.
I agree. But there is also Social Security/Medicare Taxes, State Income taxes and some municipalites also levy an income tax. It is a fair argument to say that total taxation is in the effective 25-30% ballpark; because I pay ~28% in total taxation.
So when pharmacists say they're in the 35% bracket, their 100k isn't reduced to ~65k? I was not aware of that.
http://www.moneychimp.com/features/tax_brackets.htm
Gives a very nice example. So on 100k, the effective tax rate is roughly 22%. Very interesting.
That's the case for the majority of states, luckily here in Florida we don't have state/local income taxes so low 20's% taxation is the norm for practicing Pharmacists. Heck, my Pharmacy Manager was talking freely about his taxes and he said he paid about 19% last year, don't know the details though.
This is a very common misunderstanding of our tax code.
We're taxed in "layers" of income. There is a base level, which is taxed at one rate. Your next layer up is taxed at a different rate, and then you might have even more layers on top, with higher rates. You cannot make more money and actually bring home less overall due to an income bracket. Read the layer cake analogy at the bottom:
http://www.marketplace.org/topics/elections/gop-contenders/week-review-romneys-159-tax-rate
You can shield a lot of income from taxes legally, if you know what you are doing. Then again....my first career was accounting.
I'm currently a PGY1 resident and I accepted a job that pays in the low 90s. The salary is a little less than I was expecting, especially considering that I have greater than 130k debt looming over me. However, the job offers many other perks to compensate for the salary (no holidays or weekends, 100% clinical with a rounding service, no staffing required, etc).
Woah, this is really bad... wtf? And PGY-1? What geographical region are you? Are you full time? "Brand Name" Hospital of the area? What's the hourly rate?
The M-F / no-staffing part is boob, but for that salary you should do your time and be looking to apply elsewhere broheim...
Woah, this is really bad... wtf? And PGY-1? What geographical region are you? Are you full time? "Brand Name" Hospital of the area? What's the hourly rate?
The M-F / no-staffing part is boob, but for that salary you should do your time and be looking to apply elsewhere broheim...
Woah, this is really bad... wtf? And PGY-1? What geographical region are you? Are you full time? "Brand Name" Hospital of the area? What's the hourly rate?
The M-F / no-staffing part is boob, but for that salary you should do your time and be looking to apply elsewhere broheim...
I agree. This seems significantly lower than what Ive heard from PGY trained people around my school and area. (sample size is only a handful but I havent heard anything below 105k on the very low end). On the other hand, I have heard of at least a couple hospitals paying 85k for staffing with variable shifts, but that usually seemed to be bumped up at least 15k due to shift differentials.
At least you can be thankful you dont have >250k of debt like some of us.
Rural Northern CA
Wags $63.??
CVS~$64
Rx Mgr $67
Community hospital $55
Per Diem $63
Local Indie $60
All are hourly and I've either been on payroll for or was quoted by HR/DM.
Yep. Rural gets the bucks. I define rural as >2 hours from a large metropolitan area.
I always enjoy seeing what other people define as rural. The talk of only being able to get a job in a rural area used to get to me on occassion, until I learned that "rural" seems to mean any city less than a few hundred thousand people.
Rural is cows and cornfields 😛
Trust me....farmercyst is in rural area
LOL --> one of those "rural" areas where you NEVER ask the locals what they do for a living...![]()
Quick guess...Humboldt County?
I've heard stories.
Quick guess...Humboldt County?
I've heard stories.
"Graduate pharmacist" is an odd title for a regular rph job. I'm thinking it might be a resident. If so, that's a reasonable salary.Was looking at jobs in Hawaii and stumbled across this - $42k/yr for a a hospital pharmacy job....interesting. BTW they are offering $50 less a month for a cook.
Pharmacist -
http://www.hhsc.org/recruit/jobannc/GRADUATE PHARMACIST HMC 74-12 4-2-12.pdf
Cook -
http://www.hhsc.org/recruit/jobannc/COOK II HMC 45-12 2-27-12.pdf
This is the same city that opened a pharmacy school 5 years ago, citing they were meeting the 'demands of the area'.
Was looking at jobs in Hawaii and stumbled across this - $42k/yr for a a hospital pharmacy job....interesting. BTW they are offering $50 less a month for a cook.

LOL guys a "graduate pharmacist" is someone who has graduated from pharmacy school but hasn't taken their licensing exams yet...it's like in between an intern and a licenses pharmacist
everyone who saw that was probably freaking out thinking salaries are slashed in half![]()