Official 2013 Step 1 Experiences and Scores Thread

This forum made possible through the generous support of SDN members, donors, and sponsors. Thank you.

Phloston

Osaka, Japan
Removed
Lifetime Donor
10+ Year Member
Joined
Jan 18, 2012
Messages
3,880
Reaction score
1,676
I figure now is a good time to jump-start this thread.

Even though some of us who had taken the exam in late-2012 are still awaiting our scores (amid the holiday delays) and could technically still post within last year's thread, it is after all mid-January now, so it's probably apposite that we move forward and hope for a great year.

:luck: Cheers to 2013 :luck:
 
I had read about how much minutiae was tested (and there is some), but overall I feel like it's a good bank that I'm learning a great deal from.
.

You mean real test had minutiae from kaplan Qbank? Were those minutiae covered in FA,Rx and UW? or only in Kaplan Qbank? Unfortunately, I don't have much time to do kaplan Qbank too! but if there are particular sections that are most important, please let me know!
If you can provide an idea about the breakdown of Kaplan Qbank per subject, then I would be much grateful!
 
I think BioStats and Molecular Biology questions are really good.
Do Histology and Genetics if you have time.
 
Last edited:
I did it. Only section I didn't finish was the neuro portion and biostats. Yeah, it's slightly more challenging compared to UWorld, but I was happy with the results. Had two questions verbatim show up on my CBSE.

However, I feel the explanations at times, especially for the cadio portion - on second thought, only the cardio physio portion; really lacked at times. It was good too, that they gave the reference of where the info is in FA, to reduce time to search through FA.

Don't forget to do WebPath questions. Another free 2,900 questions. Also check out www.usmlequickprep.com which has 4,000 free questions.

Has anyone gone through the question bank at usmlequickprep.com? Can you comment on the quality and how it compares to the other question banks.
 
You mean real test had minutiae from kaplan Qbank? Were those minutiae covered in FA,Rx and UW? or only in Kaplan Qbank? Unfortunately, I don't have much time to do kaplan Qbank too! but if there are particular sections that are most important, please let me know!
If you can provide an idea about the breakdown of Kaplan Qbank per subject, then I would be much grateful!

No, sorry for the misunderstanding. I haven't taken my exam yet, so I can't comment on the level of minutiae on the real deal. I had heard that Kaplan Qbank had a higher proportion of questions that dealt with crazy factoids that you either know or don't (i.e. it made you rely less on critical thinking and more on trivial knowledge). These questions do pop up from time to time, but overall I've been impressed with the questions' ability to make me think on my feet. I'm far from a genius, so it's nice to be really challenged on each question and then pick up a key factoid or two from each explanation. Hopefully I'll feel the same way when I start UWorld next month.

If you're asking about the number of questions in the bank per subject, it currently goes something like this:

By system:
Cardio - 247
Endocrine - 123
GI - 200
Heme/Lymph - 100
MSK - 141
Neuro - 263
Renal - 111
Repro - 154
Respiratory - 129
Skin/Connective Tissue - 45

By discipline:
Behavioral - 95
Biochem - 60
Biostats - 25
Cell Bio - 27
Embryo - 43
Genetics - 55
Gross Anatomy - 202
Histo - 20
Immuno - 104
Micro - 223
Molecular Bio - 33
Path - 562
Pathophys - 313
Pharm - 271
Phys - 174

Hope this helps! Good luck!
 
Just noticed that:
Score reporting of Step 1 results occurs within four weeks of testing. However, because of necessary modifications to the test item pool, there will be a delay in reporting for some examinees testing beginning the week of May 13th. The target date for reporting Step 1 scores for most examinees testing the week of May 13th through late June will be Wednesday, July 10, 2013. For examinees whose circumstances require that they receive Step 1 scores before July 10, it is recommended that they take Step 1 no later than May 10, 2013.

http://www.usmle.org/announcements/default.aspx?ContentId=113

My exam is after that period! Don't know what the hell modification would be!
 
Hi Pholston, can you say the same about kaplan q bank also?(i.e Qs from kaplan qbank)
Since am just doing Rx and UW with FA and pathoma.
Thanks.

In terms of importance: UWorld > Rx > Kaplan

Kaplan definitely got me some points on my NBMEs and real deal, but the former two QBanks are higher-yield. You have to sift through a lot of the esoteria in Kaplan, but you will learn a lot doing the QBank.

Each QBank provides something unique. You don't have to do all three to get a great score, but I can 100% say that I had an extremely difficult molecular biology lab technique question on my exam that I got right, and I only got a 262 on the Step1. Kaplan prepped me better for mo bio than did UWorld or Rx (by a long-shot). Had I not done Kaplan QBank, I'm scared to think how borderline things may have been.

As someone who's already gone through FA, can I reasonably expect to finish usmleRX in ONE week? assuming 12-14 hr/day

You're gonna burn out if you keep doing questions all day...

I like fleshwound's mentality. I would say it's reasonable to finish the USMLE Rx in ~10 days. I would only recommend that pace if you are within one month of your exam. Realistically, shoot for 10-12-hr days. If you are > 1 month-out, I would do it in two weeks and spend a little bit more time perusing (critically reading) the explanations.
 
I like fleshwound's mentality. I would say it's reasonable to finish the USMLE Rx in ~10 days. I would only recommend that pace if you are within one month of your exam. Realistically, shoot for 10-12-hr days. If you are > 1 month-out, I would do it in two weeks and spend a little bit more time perusing (critically reading) the explanations.


Sweet, thanks. Indeed, Rx goes a lot faster than UW.
 
I am having trouble getting through more than 50 questions in UWORLD per day. It literally takes me the whole day to do 50 questions and read explanations. Is that too long???
 
I am having trouble getting through more than 50 questions in UWORLD per day. It literally takes me the whole day to do 50 questions and read explanations. Is that too long???

It depends on how many you're getting wrong, and how many you're getting dead right. The more questions you have that are no brainers, the less you're going to reflect on and annotate those explanations. If you're getting 25 wrong per block, and it's all stuff you've never seen before or don't understand too well, it's gonna take a fair bit of time to work through those explanations and the topics they involve.

All in all, I think a whole day is too long. You can click through a block in 30-60 minutes and read through the explanations within another hour. After that, you can mark or annotate the topics you need to review or refresh, which can take some more time on top of that. You might be looking at 4 hours or so if it was a really tough block, but I wouldn't count all the time that you're spending reading FA and refreshing your knowledge to be time spent "doing a block."
 
Got my result today. 243.

Here’s how my experience went down. As an international medical student, our curriculum is heavily focused on clinical science, and basic science is only cursory. As a result, my starting knowledge in biochemistry, microbiology, genetics and immunology was nonexistent. Pharmacology was weak. Pathology, anatomy, physiology, behavioural science were good.

Study Timeline

Started with two weeks of FA biochemistry, fleshing out things with Kaplan LNs where applicable. This was a mistake to do so early, since I had to revise it heavily towards the end of my prep, having forgotten a lot of the metabolic pathways. Then began Pathoma (and wished I had started it earlier), took about 2 weeks to watch all the videos and more or less memorise the book by transcribing most of the points into Anki flashcards. Excellent resource, I actively enjoyed learning from Sattar’s teaching.

Moved onto microbiology, using MicroCards, and transcribed their contents into Anki. This was a shock to the system, since it was so detail heavy, but Anki helped make things stick. Also added any facts that were additionally present in FA Micro. This took around 7-9 days. Immunology and pharmacology followed, and again, my only source was FA, transcribing every fact into Anki cards. These two took probably around 10 days. The same process I repeated for Physiology and Anatomy from First Aid over the following 2 weeks. My physiology turned out not to be as strong as I thought, so this took a little longer than expected. Tried BRS physio but did not like it.

My full-time study was from the start of December to mid Feb, with the intention of sitting the exam at the end of this period. Unfortunately plans changed, and the date was pushed 3 weeks forwards into a very busy clinical surgical rotation, where I had minimal time for study during the week.

UWorld I began in early/mid Jan, and did around 1-2 blocks per night for 30 days. Usually, I would do the topic I had been studying during the day in the first block (subject, timed), and the second block would be a block of all the topics studied up until that point. This meant at the start I was just doing two blocks of pathology, but towards the end of my study period, my second block was effectively timed random. I found this was an effective way to combine the utility of timed subject and timed random – as I was learning from the Qbank. Any incorrect questions or correctly answered questions with important explanations I would make into Anki flash cards as well. I did some USMLERx (~800q) early in my prep, before starting UWorld, but abandoned it when I started the latter.

My prep was effectively complete towards the middle of Feb, but as mentioned I had to spend the next 3 weeks mitigating the damage of facts leaking out of my head, before finally sitting the exam. Some of you may have noticed my reliance on Anki, and I’ve developed a love-hate relationship with the program. My daily review cards escalated very quickly, and so towards the middle of January, about 3-4 hours of study each day were dedicated to just card review. In terms of time efficiency this was not ideal, but it did help to solidify the facts. It also meant that I only ‘went through’ FA once, and did no annotations – as most of the book was in flashcards, and so were all the things I would have added from UWorld. Throughout these 2-3 months, I listened to Goljan in the car. This made my busy days on rotation towards the end of my study period a little more guilt free.

NBME11 – 235 (3 weeks out)
NBME13 – 245 (2 weeks out)
NBME 12 – 226 (10 days out)
NBME7 – 235 (1 week out)
UWSA1 – 245 (3 days out, back to back with UWSA2)
UWSA2 – 247
Free150 – 86% (2 days out)
UWorld cumulative – 70%

The exam

As far as difficulty goes, I thought the real thing was easily on par with the NBMEs. The UWSAs I thought were easier.
In decreasing difficulty UW > Step 1 = NBME > UWSA > Free150

The exam itself is a bit of a blur to be honest. The first 4 blocks I finished with about 15 mins spare to go over the questions. The final 2 blocks were much more difficult and I was pressed for time, and flagged a large number of questions. Large number of theoretical investigation type questions (which I am no good at). Generally speaking, the questions were very straightforward. Almost no three-step reasoning questions, with plenty of straightforward fact recall.

  • Anatomy – Brachial plexus, lymph nodes, pelvic anatomy. Lots of neuroanatomy.
  • Microbiology – Not many questions, fairly straightforward, only one or two questions on worms, the rest were classic bugs. MicroCards were overkill for this, for certain.
  • Immunology – FA was easily enough for this
  • Embryology – I think I was lucky here. The questions were straightforward and few in number. I decided to not study this topic, and it did not affect my score.
  • Behavioral Science – Again, I did little study for this. Biostats were straighforward incidence, prevalence and sensitivity type questions. Psych and patient-doctor scenario questions generally had an obvious answer.
  • Biochemistry – Was fairly clinical, and the questions that were not, were facts from FA. Biochemistry was a subject I was afraid would slam me, but FA was sufficient.
  • Physiology – A number of difficult questions came from here, and I am uncertain whether my reasoning was always correct.
  • Pathology – On the whole, Pathoma and FA were enough for this. Had a few questions that were decidedly difficult, but I wouldn’t have gone through all of Goljan for the chance of being able to answer them.
  • Pharmacology – I knew this section very well, and was disappointed with the number of questions. Most were single step name the side effect/mechanism/resistance mechanism questions.

So all in all, I think I was lucky with a good question set that generally played to my strengths. I made quite a few careless errors which really played on my mind in the 3 weeks following the exam, but that’s the nature of exam taking. I hope that this allays the fears of some people planning to take the exam. FA, UWorld, Pathoma (and Microcards) were what I primarily used, and these were enough for someone with no background in half the subjects of the USMLE (see first paragraph). In retrospect, I had only about ?5/6 questions which I feel I could have answered if I hadn’t pushed my exam date. So don’t get too bent out of shape if you need to take the exam without having a dedicated cram period immediately before. Also take heart that your most recent NBME may not be as accurate as your most recent UWSA in score prediction.

Things I did not study
  • Embryology, Medical ethics, Psychiatry

Things I would do differently

  • Do Biochemistry later in the study period, as it’s very detail heavy
  • Start with Pathoma
  • Probably not bother with MicroCards. But ambivalent about this one, as I still value the additional knowledge that came from these cards.
  • Make more time to review NBME incorrects. I had questions in the real thing that came from these, not sure if I got them all
  • Write up my flashcards before my dedicated study period. This would have saved an immense amount of time.
  • Focus some more on the theoretical investigation questions. Probably via Kaplan.

This forum, whilst excellent at promoting an inferiority complex, was also a very useful source of information for me. So I hope this helps.
 
congrats Rock. lots of neuroanatomy on your exam = 🙁

how many questions would you say you had per block? 2/block? i'd consider brachial plexus more so with neuro...but that's cool

i'm stressing more and more because it seems like neuroanatomy is starting to get more "step time" as i see people writing their experiences...🙁
 
In terms of importance: UWorld > Rx > Kaplan

Kaplan definitely got me some points on my NBMEs and real deal, but the former two QBanks are higher-yield. You have to sift through a lot of the esoteria in Kaplan, but you will learn a lot doing the QBank.

Each QBank provides something unique. You don't have to do all three to get a great score, but I can 100% say that I had an extremely difficult molecular biology lab technique question on my exam that I got right, and I only got a 262 on the Step1. Kaplan prepped me better for mo bio than did UWorld or Rx (by a long-shot). Had I not done Kaplan QBank, I'm scared to think how borderline things may have been.



Thanks Pholston 🙂
Another thing- Does UW biostats & epi qbank help?
 
congrats Rock. lots of neuroanatomy on your exam = 🙁

how many questions would you say you had per block? 2/block? i'd consider brachial plexus more so with neuro...but that's cool

i'm stressing more and more because it seems like neuroanatomy is starting to get more "step time" as i see people writing their experiences...🙁

Yeah I suppose it depends on your definition of neuroanatomy. Mine was predominantly spine and brain slices (and one gross brainstem), where you had to name the structure/location of injury. Not sure about per block, but there were easily 10 questions (total). Maybe a little more. Some asked very similar things to one another. So not a massive amount, but anatomy-wise, it was certainly the topic with the most airtime.

Interestingly my exam had no chest/abdo CT slices, but did have a few axial and coronal brain CTs.
 
Another thing- Does UW biostats & epi qbank help?

It's poorly put together and didn't do that much to help me in retrospect. The only reason I did it was because I was OCD about doing as many Qs as possible. If you feel your biostats isn't 100% yet, do it.

Yeah I suppose it depends on your definition of neuroanatomy. Mine was predominantly spine and brain slices (and one gross brainstem), where you had to name the structure/location of injury. Not sure about per block, but there were easily 10 questions (total). Maybe a little more. Some asked very similar things to one another. So not a massive amount, but anatomy-wise, it was certainly the topic with the most airtime.

Interestingly my exam had no chest/abdo CT slices, but did have a few axial and coronal brain CTs.

I had a tonnn of neuro on my exam too. Probably 40 questions (~5-6 Qs/block).
 
Phloston: if you did not have much time to do all kaplan Qbank, what subjects/systems would you do?
I will cover Rx and UW completely, so I am asking about kaplan Qbank questions not covered at all or not well in those two banks.
 
Phloston: if you did not have much time to do all kaplan Qbank, what subjects/systems would you do?
I will cover Rx and UW completely, so I am asking about kaplan Qbank questions not covered at all or not well in those two banks.

Molecular bio, biostats, biochem.

Mo bio is strong in Kaplan QBank, and it definitely saved me on my exam.

You can never get enough biostats. Concepts remain easy, but you should be hyper-familiar with everything.

Biochem is solid in Kaplan, and it helped make the minutiae UWorld biochem questions "gimmies." The net result is that you'll end up seeing some lower-yield concepts twice instead of once. Then on your real deal, when you encounter a low-yield spin-off question, suddenly it's just a rapid recall click.
 
Molecular bio, biostats, biochem.

Mo bio is strong in Kaplan QBank, and it definitely saved me on my exam.

You can never get enough biostats. Concepts remain easy, but you should be hyper-familiar with everything.

Biochem is solid in Kaplan, and it helped make the minutiae UWorld biochem questions "gimmies." The net result is that you'll end up seeing some lower-yield concepts twice instead of once. Then on your real deal, when you encounter a low-yield spin-off question, suddenly it's just a rapid recall click.

Awesome!
Your in depth replies are helping very much. Thanks for choosing medicine.🙂
 
is it really true that the step doesn't ask biochemical structure questions? all the vids i've seen, they say don't worry about the structure because it doesn't get asked anymore.

however, i recall one of the offline nbme's asking a structure question...asking which other drug follows same type of metabolism or something.

was doing alcohol metabolism and the guy was mentioning how carbon 1 is metabolized by both enzymes of the pathway...would the boards ask something like this? give the structure of ethanol, and ask which carbon is metabolized?
 
is it really true that the step doesn't ask biochemical structure questions? all the vids i've seen, they say don't worry about the structure because it doesn't get asked anymore.

however, i recall one of the offline nbme's asking a structure question...asking which other drug follows same type of metabolism or something.

was doing alcohol metabolism and the guy was mentioning how carbon 1 is metabolized by both enzymes of the pathway...would the boards ask something like this? give the structure of ethanol, and ask which carbon is metabolized?

FA shows the derivations of the individual carbons and nitrogens for the purine/pyrimidine structure. I would be familiar with those going in. I believe it's p.68 of FA2012 IIRC.

Is that crap low-yield? Yeah. But it's in FA. Anything in FA should be memorized.

I would also be familiar with which carbon the azide group is attached to on zidovudine. I had a question on that which asked you to pick the carbon.

That's all 270+ material.
 
Is that in FA ??😱😱😱 if not, where?

Seriously if you're memorizing molecular structures for this test you need to be shot for your own good.

I don't even remember what the hell an azide is. Somehow I managed to get by.
 
FA shows the derivations of the individual carbons and nitrogens for the purine/pyrimidine structure. I would be familiar with those going in. I believe it's p.68 of FA2012 IIRC.

Is that crap low-yield? Yeah. But it's in FA. Anything in FA should be memorized.

I would also be familiar with which carbon the azide group is attached to on zidovudine. I had a question on that which asked you to pick the carbon.

That's all 270+ material.

yeah that 3' of the pentose aka deoxyribose sugar...causes "chain termination"
 
Seriously if you're memorizing molecular structures for this test you need to be shot for your own good.

I don't even remember what the hell an azide is. Somehow I managed to get by.

Luck, in the draw of the questions you got for your exam...surely plays a role in getting a good score....no?
 
Luck, in the draw of the questions you got for your exam...surely plays a role in getting a good score....no?

Ask yourself if memorizing molecular structure is the best use of your time. If you aren't above 271 on your nbme (minus 6/97%), you would be a fool to think this was a good use of your time. Focus on high yield material, not minutiae. Med students don't understand this and it's infuriating.
 
Quick question- I was just wondering, how does nbme 15 compare to 12,7,11,13? Would it be a gamble not doing it going into the exam given my scores on 11,12,13 are pretty good?
 
I am afraid to take 15 after so many people saying it is so hard. I want to go into the test feeling confident. That being said I believe the more you see the better you will do.
 
I am afraid to take 15 after so many people saying it is so hard. I want to go into the test feeling confident. That being said I believe the more you see the better you will do.

After going through the exam and then going back to 15 after, I'd say its a good use of time to even get it offline and go through it. I saw identical answer choices and concepts from 15 on mine. I feel it would've been worth studying the answers, not the score prediction itself.
 
Ask yourself if memorizing molecular structure is the best use of your time. If you aren't above 271 on your nbme (minus 6/97%), you would be a fool to think this was a good use of your time. Focus on high yield material, not minutiae. Med students don't understand this and it's infuriating.

+1

You WILL miss answers which are verbatim in FA and can actually be studied easily. Those are the ones which you have more control over. Nail FA.
 
Couple of questions:

1. Can any recent test takers comment on the number of calculations you had to do on your exam?

2. I'm looking for a source to supplement my pharmacology knowledge base, as it seems to be my lowest score on almost every question block. I'm thinking I might benefit from a flashcard set, but I'm not opposed to a comprehensive review book. Any suggestions?
 
buddy took the step sometime this past week...won't give details when and his question asked which neurotransmitter is responsible for the rigidity seen in tetanus toxin? glycine and gaba were two different answer choices...

i was thinking glycine, which he said he had put down as well...what do you guys think?
 
Tetanus toxin ****s up Renshaw interneurons which use glycine as their neurotransmitter. The lack of inhibitory output from those cells results in unopposed alpha motor neuron activity.
 
Anybody ever get a question about cholesterol crystals being associated with rheumatoid arthritis or effusions into the bursa or joint space?

Just ran into it on webpath.
 
NBME 5: 245
NBME 6: 247
NBME 7: 254
CBSE : >260
NBME 11: 252
NBME 12: 261
UWSA 1: 265

Test in under 2 weeks. I have found that doing questions works best for me. I just get too bored trying to study from a book, even a review book.
 
NBME 5: 245
NBME 6: 247
NBME 7: 254
CBSE : >260
NBME 11: 252
NBME 12: 261
UWSA 1: 265

Test in under 2 weeks. I have found that doing questions works best for me. I just get too bored trying to study from a book, even a review book.

Why don't you just move your test to an earlier date and take it already? You'll get a longer vacation too.
 
I honestly would like to. Doesn't it cost money to reschedule though? My funds are running pretty low.

It's $50 as long as it's 5 days before your original date.

You're already at 250+ which makes you competitive enough for any specialty. It's totally your call.
 
I honestly would like to. Doesn't it cost money to reschedule though? My funds are running pretty low.

it's worth the 50 bucks if only because you might get burnt out and score lower than you would otherwise if you continue to wait.
 
the worst part about step 1 studying....







my brain makes me feel guilty when i try to sleep...sometimes ill only sleep for 2 hours...no matter how tired i am..i just cant get into that stage 4/delta of the cycle :laugh:🙁
 
Anybody ever get a question about cholesterol crystals being associated with rheumatoid arthritis or effusions into the bursa or joint space?

Just ran into it on webpath.

That's on Webpath and Kaplan QBank.

Kaplan liked Baker cyst as swelling of / cholesterol deposition in semimembranosus bursa.
 
NBME 5: 245
NBME 6: 247
NBME 7: 254
CBSE : >260
NBME 11: 252
NBME 12: 261
UWSA 1: 265

Test in under 2 weeks. I have found that doing questions works best for me. I just get too bored trying to study from a book, even a review book.

Why don't you just move your test to an earlier date and take it already? You'll get a longer vacation too.

I'm curious to see how NBMEs13+15 go for you.

Don't move up your test. Continue reviewing FA and learning from your incorrect NBME questions. It appears you're hovering around the 260-barrier. If you go into the real deal well-rested and don't make mistakes, you'll exceed 260. Just keep pushing.
 
I'm curious to see how NBMEs13+15 go for you.

Don't move up your test. Continue reviewing FA and learning from your incorrect NBME questions. It appears you're hovering around the 260-barrier. If you go into the real deal well-rested and don't make mistakes, you'll exceed 260. Just keep pushing.

Just curious, what are the general opinions on the various NBME exams? I took one yesterday (two weeks into my studying) and did well - at least well enough that I'm happy with my score considering how little I've studied (one pass through FA, 20% UWorld finished) and how much time I have left (just under 5 weeks). It seems generally that scores from NBME are relatively predictive but, like the full-length MCAT practice exams, there seem to be tests that are more "accurate" than others. Compared to UWorld I found the questions on the NBME exam to be pretty easy; where UWorld questions seem to test very specific details, I found that most of the NBME questions were extremely clear cut (though there were still a handful of questions that tested minutia). Is this typical? Or was this exam weird?

FWIW, I took NBME 13. I've also bought 12 and will probably do one more NBME a week or two before my exam.
 
Step 1 questions tend to be very straight forward. UWorld has a goal of also teaching you something, so they tend to be harder on average. Sure, there are Step 1 questions that are hard like UWorld questions, but they're not nearly as common. Kaplan likes to trick you just to trick you. I felt it was very un-Step 1-like.

NBME form questions ARE Step 1 questions. Some appear to be in the active question bank (despite official denials to the contrary.) There is a decent probability that you will see questions from recent NBME forms on your exam. In addition school bought CBSEs and school bought NBME subject exams (pathology, physiology, and pharmacology especially) have questions that are also in the active Step 1 question bank.
 
Top