- Joined
- Jul 20, 2016
- Messages
- 202
- Reaction score
- 133
So I applied to 100 programs and only got 10 interviews. 225/239 DO student...
Anyone got an interview from UTRGV? I couldn't find any mention in any of the threads. Any updates with the program? I know last year they were asking for secondary application but this year it was kind of asked to be attached to main application.
has anyone been at an interview where you were not asked any questions by the PD? or the PD started off the interview with "do you have any questions for me?" does this mean that they are not interested in you?
You and me both. I had an interview with a big name program... if I'm being honest, I was sort of hoping I would hate it so that I wouldn't have to start hoping to match there. But I loved every second, and when the interview with the PD came I just was a giant ball of anxiety realizing that I really legitimately want this program and can't hide from that fact. Sigh. So hey, there's the bright side - you have other interviewees being *****s and blowing their interviews, too (you probably didn't blow your interview. And maybe I didn't blow mine. But gosh it does feel that way, doesn't it?)
So I applied to 100 programs and only got 10 interviews. 225/239 DO student...
has anyone been at an interview where you were not asked any questions by the PD? or the PD started off the interview with "do you have any questions for me?" does this mean that they are not interested in you?
this has happened to me, i think it depends mostly on the personality of the interviewer. i wouldn't read too much into ithas anyone been at an interview where you were not asked any questions by the PD? or the PD started off the interview with "do you have any questions for me?" does this mean that they are not interested in you?
Ha, I had an interview where my interviewer started by "So, how can I help you?" and, without waiting for my answer, jumped into grilling me on minute details of my research. I haven't been grilled about my research like this since my thesis defense (and, alas, I got defensive at some point during the interview). He actually did help me ultimately - by giving me a great idea for my project. But this was the most "stress" interview I've had.has anyone been at an interview where you were not asked any questions by the PD? or the PD started off the interview with "do you have any questions for me?" does this mean that they are not interested in you?
My thoughts on it are that Doximity's poll is even more bogus and meaningless than US News'.Not that these rankings should really matter, but just wondering about why BIDMC-Harvard is ranked so much lower than Brigham on Doximity? Anyone have any insight into this? It seems strange considering both used to be part of the same (and well-regarded) Longwood program, and at least based on my experience at interview day BI seems like an absolutely incredible program. Interested to hear people's thoughts on this.
I recently interviewed at BIDMC and loved it as well. I actually believe it's a better training program *in psychiatry* than BWH.Not that these rankings should really matter, but just wondering about why BIDMC-Harvard is ranked so much lower than Brigham on Doximity? Anyone have any insight into this? It seems strange considering both used to be part of the same (and well-regarded) Longwood program, and at least based on my experience at interview day BI seems like an absolutely incredible program. Interested to hear people's thoughts on this.
That’s good to hear. I wonder how far down their lists most programs go? I heard one interviewer (average size program- 6 residents, I think) brag that they only went to #27 last year (and interviewed like 80). Hopefully most programs go further down the ranklist than that. I feel like I’m a decent applicant (>10 offers) who interviews reasonably well, but I still ideally would like to go into an interview with greater than 1-in-3 odds.
Yep. It’s definitely frustrating that PDs seem to care so much about bragging rights.Had a program brag the same thing at an interview a few weeks ago. I nodded my head and smiled while inside my head I was saying "That's cool bro".
We only care about it because applicants seem to care about "prestige" and "rankings".Yep. It’s definitely frustrating that PDs seem to care so much about bragging rights.
I thought the poster was specifically referring to the way some programs care and will change rankings so they don't go far down their lists as a kind of internal ego boost. I was told explicitly by advisers in another specialty I was considering that this was a known factor in their field. Once everyone has interviewed both applicants and programs should just rank based on preference, but people seem bound and determined to fail to understand the algorithm which leads to all the post interview communications and outright lies you hear about by both programs and applicants. Its part of why it's hard to shake the fear of not matching even when you are well qualified because what if instead of trusting the algorithm, a PD despite taking the time to interview you didn't think you seemed pumped enough about their program and drops you down their rank list bc they want to match in their top 30 not top 50.We only care about it because applicants seem to care about "prestige" and "rankings".
Face it, we have precious little objective evidence for program quality. The VAST majority of our graduates get jobs and pass boards. Almost all PDs I know are equally concerned about resident wellbeing and happiness.
So...what makes one program better than another?
Yeah, I get it--but once you've been through this cycle half a dozen times and learn that the guy you got at #47 one year is just as competent than the guy you got at #20 the year before (and less trouble than the guy you got at #5 a couple of years before) you stop worrying about it as much.I thought the poster was specifically referring to the way some programs care and will change rankings so they don't go far down their lists as a kind of internal ego boost. I was told explicitly by advisers in another specialty I was considering that this was a known factor in their field. Once everyone has interviewed both applicants and programs should just rank based on preference, but people seem bound and determined to fail to understand the algorithm which leads to all the post interview communications and outright lies you hear about by both programs and applicants. Its part of why it's hard to shake the fear of not matching even when you are well qualified because what if instead of trusting the algorithm, a PD despite taking the time to interview you didn't think you seemed pumped enough about their program and drops you down their rank list bc they want to match in their top 30 not top 50.
I'm not accusing any of the wonderful PDs who post here of doing this kind of thing but given that I've been told that it does happen by people involved in putting together rank lists, I do find it depressing...
Sent from my [device_name] using SDN mobile
I understand this was not what you were addressing in your response, but as a continuation of the discussion -Yeah, I get it--but once you've been through this cycle half a dozen times and learn that the guy you got at #47 one year is just as competent than the guy you got at #20 the year before (and less trouble than the guy you got at #5 a couple of years before) you stop worrying about it as much.
I recently interviewed at BIDMC and loved it as well. I actually believe it's a better training program *in psychiatry* than BWH.
1) Doximity rankings are based on Doximity members polls; basically they're popularity contests where perceived prestige plays a great role. There is a joke that Princeton Law School was named one of the best US law schools in a similar poll among lawyers; the catch it, Princeton doesn't have a law school.
2) There's a self-perpetuating effect - eg., MGH will continue to be number one because it's always been number one, so it has to be the best, right?
3) There is also a halo effect. Which is where I get to the point regarding BWH vs. BIDMC ranking. BWH, a paternal twin of MGH, has been a top hospital for *medical and surgical* specialties attracting complicated patients/difficult cases from all over the world. By comparison, BIDMC is considered a more "community" (though it's still very much academic) hospital for medicine and surgery. And with the halo effect, the more renowned medical/surgical reputation translates into more assumed prestige for BWH psychiatry without any actual evidence for it.
4) Since the Longwood "divorce" it's actually BIDMC that's been carrying the Longwood flag. To start with, BIDMC was a strong prestigious psych program of its own before its merger into Longwood. Longwood's founder and long-time PD is now BIDMC psychiatry chair. The most recent/current Longwood PD will continue on as BIDMC PD.
In terms of services/training opportunities BIDMC "lost" in the divorce from BWH, almost all of them are redundant - another psych inpatient unit, another C-L service. I pressed senior Longwood residents really hard as to what were the differences between the corresponding services at BWH and BIDMC and they ultimately conceded that there were more medically complicated patients at BWH (consistent with the above: BWH is strong in medicine and attracts more complicated patients) but that BIDMC psych inpatient had sicker patients and BIDMC C-L had more eating disorders (because of some medicine docs specializing in eating disorders there). Doesn't sound bad at all to me. One non-redundant service that BIDMC lost was addictions, but they arranged a relationship with a VA for a detox unit and residential treatment rotation for interns (as well as an opportunity for a PTSD elective), and all the residents I talked to who had already done this rotation were extatic about it. BIDMC also created a new addictons service within C-L.
BWH is perceived to be stronger in neuropsych (the chair is a neuropsychiatrist), "biological" psychiatry and research, but BIDMC has its own strong neuropsych - in fact, it has one of the top neuromodulation centers in the country, research (particularly at Mass Mental) and certainly doesn't lack in psychopharm education.
On the other hand, what BIDMC "retained" after the divorce is its renowned outpatient clinic and strong psychotherapy training, as well as its affiliations with Mass Mental and Fenway Health, which are fantastic patient care, research and training institutions in their own right.
I talked to our program coordinator yesterday and she said she had a bunch of cancellations over the holidays.
A few questions I’ve been wondering about—
1) I really thought there would be more offers going out this month. I’ve met several people on my later interviews who have said they plan to cancel their January interviews (because they’ve already found their #1, have enough interviews, are tired of interviewing, etc). Wonder if we’ll see any last minute offers going out next month from these cancellations?
2) How necessary are second looks? I’ve heard at least 3 or 4 current residents say they attended a second look at the program where they ended up matching. How much do y’all think they help our chances? How are they generally set up? I’m running low on both free time and money at this point.
3) How should we contact our top few programs to let them know they’re our top few programs? Anybody got a good email outline typed up yet?
Should I still be hopeful for possible interviews? Or does it seem like the season is pretty much over in terms of invites? (IMG here)
Should I still be hopeful for possible interviews? Or does it seem like the season is pretty much over in terms of invites? (IMG here)
are you an AMG or IMG?It's still possible to get some last minute invites! I've gotten two after Christmas! I had contacted these programs before with my interest though, so that may have helped.
are you an AMG or IMG?
Should I still be hopeful for possible interviews? Or does it seem like the season is pretty much over in terms of invites? (IMG here)
Yes, it is possible, i got four in January. Never lose hope!Should I still be hopeful for possible interviews? Or does it seem like the season is pretty much over in terms of invites? (IMG here)