USMLE Official 2018 Step 1 Experiences and Scores Thread

This forum made possible through the generous support of SDN members, donors, and sponsors. Thank you.

Foot Fetish

Full Member
7+ Year Member
Joined
Jun 4, 2016
Messages
682
Reaction score
1,419
I've always wanted to start one of these...So here we go! 🙂

My stats:

M2
Test time: June 2018
Goal score: 270

Members don't see this ad.
 
Last edited:
question about 2nd pass of UW: I averaged ~74% first pass, through about 25% 2nd pass averaging ~99%, but my NBME scores (while satisfactory) aren't astoundingly high. Should I just ditch random blocks for UW the last few days and hammer blocks only on my weaknesses instead? I just feel like there's an obvious memory aspect here and don't want to be wasting my time.

UW1 (T-4.5 weeks): 247
16 (T-3.5 weeks): 234
19 (T-3 weeks): 228
17 (T-2.5 weeks): 246
F120 (T-2 weeks): 92%
UW2 (T-1.5 weeks): 260
18 (T-1 week): 248

not sure what to make of the breakdown here, would like to be 250+, looking to be right on the cusp of that it seems
 
Members don't see this ad :)
question about 2nd pass of UW: I averaged ~74% first pass, through about 25% 2nd pass averaging ~99%, but my NBME scores (while satisfactory) aren't astoundingly high. Should I just ditch random blocks for UW the last few days and hammer blocks only on my weaknesses instead? I just feel like there's an obvious memory aspect here and don't want to be wasting my time.

UW1 (T-4.5 weeks): 247
16 (T-3.5 weeks): 234
19 (T-3 weeks): 228
17 (T-2.5 weeks): 246
F120 (T-2 weeks): 92%
UW2 (T-1.5 weeks): 260
18 (T-1 week): 248

not sure what to make of the breakdown here, would like to be 250+, looking to be right on the cusp of that it seems

I'd say is better to keep doing the random blocks, you're likely to cover more material that way. When you go over the questions you do try to really pay special attention to those topics you're weak on when and annotate FA. Read FA for those topics and really try to identify whats entirely about memorization -memorize it- and what needs to be understood (like processes etc).
 
Anyone else giving exam in May?? What do you think of the notice of test pool changes and delay in result after May. It is giving me anxiety.
 
When is your exam and how many questions did you do daily? Did you do them all random or with the blocks?

Exam is in mid June. About 70% of it was done by subject, and the last 30% was random. I try to do 3 blocks per day. I have also completed just over 70% of my UWorld first pass (timed, by subject so far, but I am transitioning to random for the remaining 30% just like I did with Kaplan). My UW average is a couple points higher than my Kaplan, but lately these random blocks are pushing it down a bit as I'm finding them significantly harder than subject blocks. Once I'm done with UW, I will tackle USMLERx.
 
Exam is in mid June. About 70% of it was done by subject, and the last 30% was random. I try to do 3 blocks per day. I have also completed just over 70% of my UWorld first pass (timed, by subject so far, but I am transitioning to random for the remaining 30% just like I did with Kaplan). My UW average is a couple points higher than my Kaplan, but lately these random blocks are pushing it down a bit as I'm finding them significantly harder than subject blocks. Once I'm done with UW, I will tackle USMLERx.

Your UWorld Average is above 81% on your first pass?...LOL
 
I've started on UWorld this January but have been doing the blocks random and untimed (only on the subjects I have completed). I was wondering if this is okay approach since I am just using it as a learning source? I have noticed a lot of people doing it by systems as they cover the system.
 
I've started on UWorld this January but have been doing the blocks random and untimed (only on the subjects I have completed). I was wondering if this is okay approach since I am just using it as a learning source? I have noticed a lot of people doing it by systems as they cover the system.

I agree with the above poster. Random is much better in my humble opinion. My averages have dropped but I feel like I think about the question more when it's random.
 
Your UWorld Average is above 81% on your first pass?...LOL
Haha...yeah, I'm averaging 83% so far, with ~600 questions to go. Like I said though, these random blocks have been humbling. I'll be happy if I can finish the first pass above 80%.
 
Members don't see this ad :)
Personally I am doing Uworld semi-random through dedicated. I feel like the biochem questions are kind of wasted right now because its been 1.5 years since I looked at it and I'm nowhere in the ballpark on a lot of them. So i'm doing random but only including subjects as I study them. For me Uworld is all about solidifying information, and adding more depth of understanding. If I haven't looked at something in 1.5 years and there's a super hard application question, I don't get much out of it. Also just took NBME15 for baseline and got 236! Two thumbs up for firecracker and one Uworld pass before dedicated, gave me a solid foundation seems like.
 
anyone know the total hours of video for sketchy pharm?

edit: about 27 hr on 1x
 
Last edited:
Personally I am doing Uworld semi-random through dedicated. I feel like the biochem questions are kind of wasted right now because its been 1.5 years since I looked at it and I'm nowhere in the ballpark on a lot of them. So i'm doing random but only including subjects as I study them. For me Uworld is all about solidifying information, and adding more depth of understanding. If I haven't looked at something in 1.5 years and there's a super hard application question, I don't get much out of it. Also just took NBME15 for baseline and got 236! Two thumbs up for firecracker and one Uworld pass before dedicated, gave me a solid foundation seems like.

Did you do FC daily for old material?
 
Did you do FC daily for old material?

Yeah I tried to. Some blocks were better than others. Honestly I think the most benefit came from using flash cards to master the material during the block. But then again who knows. If they had a daily task function to only current material I would probably have done that in retrospect.
 
i don't agree with the above peeps. seems like a total waste for me to do questions over systems i haven't covered yet. there seems to be this hard line between "systems" and "random" and it honestly seems like people talk past each other sometimes in this regard. i do them "random" but uncheck the boxes of the systems i haven't covered. is that the same as people who are in the renal block and only do renal? uh no. when i do qs i still have a mix of renal, cardio, pulm, neuro, etc etc and as i finish the last two blocks of school i'll ad those in.

again, just my two cents, but it seems to be a huge waste of time to do qs over gi when i haven't covered that subject in school yet. so, just guess on all of those qs and waste them? seems bizarre to me, tbh. i'm using uworld as both a learning tool but also to assess where i am at. to each their own.

I think for when most of us say "Random" we're talking about systems that we've already covered, at least that's what I meant when I said random. I don't think it's useful to check blocks that you haven't done. It's better to uncheck them, and as you said, add them in after you've done them (or perhaps a week before your exam/when you're comfortable enough with the information).

So in conclusion, definetly do not agree with adding in blocks that you haven't done. By saying "Random" I think most people mean blocks/systems that you've already completed. Just for clarification.
 
Getting a lot of questions wrong and actually having the excercise be a waste of time are two totally different things. It’s okay to get 40% if you learn from what you got wrong. IMO, you learn to the test better this way.
 
i don't agree with the above peeps. seems like a total waste for me to do questions over systems i haven't covered yet. there seems to be this hard line between "systems" and "random" and it honestly seems like people talk past each other sometimes in this regard. i do them "random" but uncheck the boxes of the systems i haven't covered. is that the same as people who are in the renal block and only do renal? uh no. when i do qs i still have a mix of renal, cardio, pulm, neuro, etc etc and as i finish the last two blocks of school i'll ad those in.

again, just my two cents, but it seems to be a huge waste of time to do qs over gi when i haven't covered that subject in school yet. so, just guess on all of those qs and waste them? seems bizarre to me, tbh. i'm using uworld as both a learning tool but also to assess where i am at. to each their own.

I think for when most of us say "Random" we're talking about systems that we've already covered, at least that's what I meant when I said random. I don't think it's useful to check blocks that you haven't done. It's better to uncheck them, and as you said, add them in after you've done them (or perhaps a week before your exam/when you're comfortable enough with the information).

So in conclusion, definetly do not agree with adding in blocks that you haven't done. By saying "Random" I think most people mean blocks/systems that you've already completed. Just for clarification.

Its as stated by pbrocks, these are all blocks I have covered. The big difference is that since I am starting now instead of beginning of 2nd year I would have to make sure I am doing all the pathology of 1st semester 2nd year on top of 2nd semester after each block is done. My concern would be that I'm not reaching the depth of knowledge for a system and that it wouldn't form cohesive memories. However, I still think it is the right choice. My goal was long term retention via Uworld and that would only be accomplished by a randomized setting. It was good to see some questions I got right after reading up on the questions I got wrong. At the same time, it totally irritates me when I see a question from a concept I have read several days ago and I get it wrong. So it forces long term retention down my throat, which I am glad is happening (its irritating though).
 
We're splitting hairs here people

My asking the question is not so much "which is better?" Its more "why are you doing systems" vs. "why are you doing random?" If your goal is to get to the depth level necessary before entering dedicated, then the systems approach would work well. If your goal is to get a more global understanding of how to tackle a vignette or long term retention, then random would work well. However, I am looking for other view points I have not considered.
 
Anyone else trying to get through a full complete pass of FA by dedicated? Not sure whether to complete a first pass of FA by spring break or dedicated, but spring break would mean working through ~16 pages a day which seems doable for some subjects but basically impossible for the denser ones...
 
Anyone else trying to get through a full complete pass of FA by dedicated? Not sure whether to complete a first pass of FA by spring break or dedicated, but spring break would mean working through ~16 pages a day which seems doable for some subjects but basically impossible for the denser ones...

I didn't open First Aid until 3 days before my exam

Questions >>> First Aid
 
Took step recently so I thought I'd share brief snapshot of my experience:

Studying I did 5 weeks of UFAP during dedicated and before completed most of Kaplan and Rx while using Boards and Beyond and Sketchy with courses. I also followed along with Bros + Zanki pharm all the way through till step, I felt like this was by far and away the most useful thing I did for studying, but certainly a significant time investment (ie 150k flash cards and 380 hours over the course of the last year).

I felt Step was very similar to NBMEs and the Free 120 with about 5% of questions out of the blue never seen them in any resource ever, 25% make you work for it kind of questions, and 50-70% Buzz word Buzz word Buzz word -> Answer. If I had to rank it compared to the other question difficulties UWorld > Step 1 ~ NBME 18 > other NBMEs ~ Kaplan >> Rx. I don't think there was any more studying I could have done to prepare me for some of the questions I saw, so not too worried about those. I highly suggest knowing the first few chapters of FA (ie the general principals chapters) cold as a large portion of your score will likely come from those sections, trust your buzz words, trust your NBMEs, and trust FA (those stupid mnemonics will get you free points).

Stats for stats sake:
NBME 13: 240 (10 weeks out baseline)
UWSA 1: 264 (Day 1 of dedicated)
NBME 17: 261 (Week 2 of dedicated)
NBME 16: 257 (Week 3 of dedicated)
NBME 19: 265 (Week 4 of dedicated)
UWSA 2: 266 & NBME 18: 257 (Week 5 of dedicated)
UWorld 1st Pass: 85%
Step 1: ??

Best of luck and message me if you have any questions!
 
Took step recently so I thought I'd share brief snapshot of my experience:

Studying I did 5 weeks of UFAP during dedicated and before completed most of Kaplan and Rx while using Boards and Beyond and Sketchy with courses. I also followed along with Bros + Zanki pharm all the way through till step, I felt like this was by far and away the most useful thing I did for studying, but certainly a significant time investment (ie 150k flash cards and 380 hours over the course of the last year).

I felt Step was very similar to NBMEs and the Free 120 with about 5% of questions out of the blue never seen them in any resource ever, 25% make you work for it kind of questions, and 50-70% Buzz word Buzz word Buzz word -> Answer. If I had to rank it compared to the other question difficulties UWorld > Step 1 ~ NBME 18 > other NBMEs ~ Kaplan >> Rx. I don't think there was any more studying I could have done to prepare me for some of the questions I saw, so not too worried about those. I highly suggest knowing the first few chapters of FA (ie the general principals chapters) cold as a large portion of your score will likely come from those sections, trust your buzz words, trust your NBMEs, and trust FA (those stupid mnemonics will get you free points).

Stats for stats sake:
NBME 13: 240 (10 weeks out baseline)
UWSA 1: 264 (Day 1 of dedicated)
NBME 17: 261 (Week 2 of dedicated)
NBME 16: 257 (Week 3 of dedicated)
NBME 19: 265 (Week 4 of dedicated)
UWSA 2: 266 & NBME 18: 257 (Week 5 of dedicated)
UWorld 1st Pass: 85%
Step 1: ??

Best of luck and message me if you have any questions!

Any advice regarding anatomy? I feel like I have a solid plan for all the subjects except that
 
Any advice regarding anatomy? I feel like I have a solid plan for all the subjects except that

Honestly, the anatomy on my exam was in one of two camps: very basic (i.e brachial plexus lesions, carpal tunnel, etc), or very very nitpicky (i.e. individual parts of individual skull bones, crazy pelvic anatomy). In total, I would say I had maybe 10 anatomy specific questions (maybe 6 easy and 4 hard) with around 5 more anatomy questions with associated clinical implications (i.e. brain regions, injury to x structure etc). The clinical ones are a little better because there is some context (you may not have to know the exact anatomy, but can infer based on the info given--there is often more than one route to a correct answer).

I would prepare well for the basic ones, and cross your fingers for the more complicated ones. It isn't worth it to spend three hours memorizing all the little stuff because you're gonna forget it, honestly.

As for what I used: first aid, google good images, and make sure you can know what happens with various nerve injuries (like median, ulnar, etc). I spent 1/2 day on arm stuff and 1/2 day on leg stuff, then looked over my notes the day before the exam. Last minute review definitely helped me answer at least a few questions.

disclaimer: none of the specific examples mentioned were on my test, just trying to give you an idea of what is "nitpicky" vs "basic"--obviously different people think different things are more challenging, but weird pelvic anatomy and skull stuff vs median nerve injury were what came to my head as good examples.

secondary disclaimer: I hated anatomy and was most concerned about it going into dedicated. Try not to be, knowing the basics will get you 70% of the way there.

tertiary disclaimer: took the exam mid-late jan and haven't gotten the score back, if you're curious.
 
Want some advice for a friend of mine.

About a month ago he scored between 235-239 on NBMEs 13 and 15. He took UWSA1 and scored a cumulative 57% (I don't know his 3 digit score since he was too disappointed to talk). I'm not sure how to interpret this, since I haven't taken UWSA1 myself. He also said while doing the question, he didnt find the questions to be so hard. Any idea what went wrong? Could this be an aberration? How should he proceed from here? Exam is in roughly a month.

Thanks!
 
Honestly, the anatomy on my exam was in one of two camps: very basic (i.e brachial plexus lesions, carpal tunnel, etc), or very very nitpicky (i.e. individual parts of individual skull bones, crazy pelvic anatomy). In total, I would say I had maybe 10 anatomy specific questions (maybe 6 easy and 4 hard) with around 5 more anatomy questions with associated clinical implications (i.e. brain regions, injury to x structure etc). The clinical ones are a little better because there is some context (you may not have to know the exact anatomy, but can infer based on the info given--there is often more than one route to a correct answer).

I would prepare well for the basic ones, and cross your fingers for the more complicated ones. It isn't worth it to spend three hours memorizing all the little stuff because you're gonna forget it, honestly.

As for what I used: first aid, google good images, and make sure you can know what happens with various nerve injuries (like median, ulnar, etc). I spent 1/2 day on arm stuff and 1/2 day on leg stuff, then looked over my notes the day before the exam. Last minute review definitely helped me answer at least a few questions.

disclaimer: none of the specific examples mentioned were on my test, just trying to give you an idea of what is "nitpicky" vs "basic"--obviously different people think different things are more challenging, but weird pelvic anatomy and skull stuff vs median nerve injury were what came to my head as good examples.

secondary disclaimer: I hated anatomy and was most concerned about it going into dedicated. Try not to be, knowing the basics will get you 70% of the way there.

tertiary disclaimer: took the exam mid-late jan and haven't gotten the score back, if you're curious.

Thanks! This was super informative
 
Took my exam 27th Dec, got my result today:
NBME 17 3 monthes before the exam: 196
NBME 19 11 days before the exam: 215
NBME 18 10 days before the exam: 223
UWSA1 9 days before the exam: 243
UWSA2 8 days before the exam: 230
then had flu, tonsilittis, fever for 1 week without studying any thing.
Real deal: 224

- I did perfect in first 4 blocks, Did very poor in the last 3 blocks.
- My target was 230 , Target specialty: psychiatry , Have 0 healthcare experience in USA , graduated 2014.
- This is my first exam (didnt take step 2), I dont know if I should continue and take Step 2 or I should shift to PLAB, I am very confused.
- I wish you can share your opinion.

Whats PLAB? Also, I think you should continue and take Step2
 
Just took step 1 Friday. Wasn't as tough as Uw but a little tougher than NBME. Remarkable how I saw 2 questions pertaining to the exact same concept at least 3 times. I wonder if they score those differently?

... doesn't matter, I'm hitting the champs till I forget how much it burns to have memorized all of the ;sldfjlasdjfasdfasdfasdf ****.
 
Just took step 1 Friday. Wasn't as tough as Uw but a little tougher than NBME. Remarkable how I saw 2 questions pertaining to the exact same concept at least 3 times. I wonder if they score those differently?

... doesn't matter, I'm hitting the champs till I forget how much it burns to have memorized all of the ;sldfjlasdjfasdfasdfasdf ****.

Any "WTF" questions that weren't covered in any of the major study resources? And how was anatomy?
 
Any "WTF" questions that weren't covered in any of the major study resources? And how was anatomy?
First off, your avatar and name makes me jealous.

Yes, there were like 5-10 wtf questions. However, a lot of the wtf questions that are not in FA were things I've seen in q banks

I know all of the anatomy in FA cold and there were maybe 1 or 2 questions on it
 
Just took step 1 Friday. Wasn't as tough as Uw but a little tougher than NBME. Remarkable how I saw 2 questions pertaining to the exact same concept at least 3 times. I wonder if they score those differently?

... doesn't matter, I'm hitting the champs till I forget how much it burns to have memorized all of the ;sldfjlasdjfasdfasdfasdf ****.

I had 3 questions with slight variations on the stem asking for the same treatment, and 2 questions where you had to identify the same diagnosis amongst a ton fo distracting symptoms. I assumed that some of these may be experimental questions.
 
Any "WTF" questions that weren't covered in any of the major study resources? And how was anatomy?

I had some wtf questions on embryo - esoteria not covered in what I had read and some path wtf. I don't think there's any way to prepare for them other than reading the heavier textbooks at some point previously in your foundation years and getting lucky.
 
Hey Guys
If one was to ONLY study the Educational Objectives of each question from the Rx+Uworld+Kaplan, would that be enough to cover the material for the step 1 exam? Im asking because Its taking along time to go through all the answer choices for the qbanks. Thanks
 
Hey Guys
If one was to ONLY study the Educational Objectives of each question from the Rx+Uworld+Kaplan, would that be enough to cover the material for the step 1 exam? Im asking because Its taking along time to go through all the answer choices for the qbanks. Thanks

I wouldn't advise it, but it depends on how far you are from your goal score and how much time you have left. You cannot cover 100% of what you might see on STEP 1 unless you get lucky with a form where you know everything or if you're clairvoyant.
 
Hey all! I just got my score back this morning and wanted to post here, because I know how many questions and anxieties I had along the way.

Step 1 246 (I would say 245+ lol but lets be real with each other haha)
UWSA1 (4 weeks out) 245
NBME 13 236
NBME 17 258
NBME 18: 240
UWSA 2: 249
UWorld average (timed, random): 78% (60-->85 by the end)

6 weeks of dedicated:
Resources used: DIT (for the first few weeks because I don't like reading FA), FA, Pathoma (a little), Sketchy (pharm, micro, and some path), Picmonic for storage diseases. Using sketchy pharm made my pharmacology knowledge go from terrible to one of my strengths. I can send out what I used sketchy path for, but mostly for things that are annoying to memorize (vasculitis, nephritic nephrotic, immunodeficiencies).

My impressions of the exam: I felt like I did okay, then did ****ty, then did great, and my emotions were all over the place. I could remember 15 or so that I knew I got wrong, and around 15 or so that I knew I guessed on and got right. Which seemed abysmal at the time, but now seems lucky af. Letting this test go was almost more difficult than studying for it. My exam had snow delays, so I was incredibly anxious as to whether I was even going to be able to sit for the exam. There were definitely nitpicky stupid questions, and those sucked, but were easier to guess and move on than the questions where you knew a lot about the topic, but weren't exactly sure if their wording was matching up to what you were thinking. Those are hard to let go.

Timing: LONG question stems. I ended each block with 15+ minutes and was able to review, but I read every question fast. You have to practice trusting your gut. Skim first, then look at the answers. If what you are expecting is there, pick it and move on. Yes, sometimes this method doesn't work, but psychologically, it was important for me to be able to review most/all questions to catch silly mistakes. On review I would read my answer, then read the question to make sure it fit.

Guessing: I guessed a lot, but they were mostly educated guesses. It is okay to guess when you have two left. That is gonna work out for you pretty often.

Was X on your exam? Yes and no. I got a little lucky, my exam was biochem heavy and embryology light, but I think you can expect different stuff. I had a lot of cardio and renal, and almost no neuro, but my friends who took the exam on different days had lots of neuro, etc. I had a bunch of anatomy, which was a weak point for me, but I also felt like most of it was relatively straight forward (with a few insane ones, as per usual). I also had very little micro and a bunch of parasites. I think it is reasonable to assume that one of the topics that everyone hates will be there in full force (embryology, super specific anatomy, biochem, specific immunology (IE which cell has CDX with X surface marker--not like CD4/CD8, but like CD25-these are little things that you read once but probably won't stick unless you're someone who has months to study, parasites, weird toxins from pufferfish, etc). This is 5-10% of the test. It will not make or break you. Also bear in mind that they know what you study and what you don't. For example, I got questions on disorders of the peroxisome, not lysosome; Micro questions on random parasites, not bacteria. This is rude of them. But everyone is in the same boat with this kind of thing.

After:
You may feel like you did ****ty. You may feel like you did great. Let it go either way. It is a huge accomplishment. Everyone remembers questions they got wrong. Everyone feels differently. There is comfort in knowing what you are feeling is normal--thats why these forums thrive. Let me assure you: what you are feeling is normal. If you entered into the exam with practice tests that suggest you will not fail, you will not fail.

What would I do differently//what should I do the last __ days before my exam? : I honestly felt like I was well prepared by what I did, and I would probably wouldn't change too much. I wouldn't stress as much as far as memorizing the little stuff, because it doesn't come up all too often. As far as what to do before the test: the first three chapters of pathoma are super high yield. I didn't buy into that when I was studying, but I would recommend it to anyone. It was easily the source of 10+ questions on my exam. Oh, also, I didn't know you can make flashcards from uworld images...do that.

tl;dr: After taking step, I went to visit my good friend who has CF. She is about to be added to the transplant list (i.e she is really sick). She has a 3 year old boy. She weighs maybe 80 pounds, has to walk around the house with oxygen constantly flowing and a little kid who constantly needs attention. I was putting away groceries and opened up her medication fridge/freezer instead: it was overwhelmingly full. There is a room with a world war 2 era oxygen tank, closets stacked with syringes and face masks, and hundreds of bottles of various medication. She was nauseous, weak, and sick. I played with her son while she slept. In this process, I lost touch with why we do this to ourselves. People like my friend need good doctors to take good care of them. They don't need doctors who got a 265 and made themselves miserable in the process. The powers that be (i.e. AAMC, NBME, and the various people who make massive profits off of our desire to be successful) try to convince you that this number you get at the end of 6/8/52 weeks defines you. It does not. And in the programs/places where it does: they've got the wrong idea. Work as hard as will make you happy, as hard as will make you a good physician. Emerge from this process more knowledgable than you entered, ready to take a little more responsibility for caring for people. I feel strongly that I will be as good of a doctor as my friend who makes a 230, and as my friend who makes a 255. And you will be too. There are real people at the end of this, guys, and they need caring, competent, and compassionate physicians. Try not to lose sight of that.

feel free to message me for questions or specifics.
 
Mid January scores came out today. When I was studying I found previous test takers reporting their actual scores relative to NBME 19 helpful given the harsh curve. Hope this helps calm a few nerves. Best of luck.

NBME 19: 229
Acutal: 241

Agree NBME 19's curve was crazy, under-predicated my actual score by 22 points! Don't let it scare you!
 
I'm unsure of what I'm doing wrong

Pre-Dedicated: 163
Post FA : 192
1/2 through UW, NBME 17: 211
UWSA 1: 232
Complete UW Run through, NBME 18: 215
UW average: 65%

I know the UWSA over estimates scores a little, but even with that I was on track to increase by 10 points a week. I've been doing UFAP plus B&B. I'm writing the exam in two weeks, I don't know what to do now. Go through UW again? Run through FA once more? Push the date back? I feel like there's a mismatch between how I've been performing in UW and my NBMEs. What do you guys think I should do?
 
I'm unsure of what I'm doing wrong

Pre-Dedicated: 163
Post FA : 192
1/2 through UW, NBME 17: 211
UWSA 1: 232
Complete UW Run through, NBME 18: 215
UW average: 65%

I know the UWSA over estimates scores a little, but even with that I was on track to increase by 10 points a week. I've been doing UFAP plus B&B. I'm writing the exam in two weeks, I don't know what to do now. Go through UW again? Run through FA once more? Push the date back? I feel like there's a mismatch between how I've been performing in UW and my NBMEs. What do you guys think I should do?


What is your goal score? NBME 18 and 19 have pretty harsh curves, I got a 240 on 19 for example, real deal 262. Would focus on UWorld over First Aid, you won't retain much by "running through" FA. How have you been doing UW blocks? If you are doing them by subject, that might explain the lack of improvement to some degree.
 
My goal is a 235 but I would be happy with a 230. I would rather get a 230 and take the test on the original test date than delay for a 235. I did UW on random and hit a 65%, averaging mid 50's-60's starting and finishing around 65-75% per block.
 
Took the test earlier this week, thought I would share my experience.

I thought the real deal was significantly more difficult than any NBME I took. If anything it felt more like a UWSA to me. There were a lot of "50/50ers" and I found myself taking good guesses and moving on. But this did not leave me feeling very confident. There were some gimmies but they were few and far between. Also I had at least two questions with typos which I thought was odd.

I definitely left feeling not so great but it sounds like many people feel that way. And there must be some significant form variance because I spoke with several classmates who said they thought the test was on par with NBMEs or perhaps even a little easier. So maybe I got a hard test and if thats the case I'm not as worried.

I prepped for about 6-8 weeks with a goal score of 245. Started just before xmas but my studying was sporadic until after the holidays when I went all in. I used UWorld, Pathoma, FA (read through twice), sketchy micro and I took all 6 NBME forms. UWorld was awesome early on, it helped me learn and identify weak spots which was crucial. I finished UWorld 2-3 weeks out and at this point I switched over to reviewing NBMEs. Seems like people don't stress these enough, but between the 6 forms + the free 120 you essentially have a 1320 question qbank at your disposal. Running through the NBMEs was immensely helpful.

My final 3 self assessments the week prior to my exam were:
NBME 17: 250+
NBME 18: 255+
UWSA1: 260+

We will see what happens when my score comes out in 3 weeks or so.
 
Anyone else giving exam in May?? What do you think of the notice of test pool changes and delay in result after May. It is giving me anxiety.

Now that you mention it, its giving me anxiety too. They said not to give the exam later than may 4th if we dont want to be affected by the delayed score reporting/change of test pool. So that means if we give it before may4th, we wont be have the new test pool right?
 
I think in all honesty, as long and grueling as studying for the Step 1 is, I would rather study for this than the MCAT again any day :laugh:. Part of me just wishes my test day would hurry up and get here and the other part of me just wishes I could hermit myself away for another year to study for it.

Student: DO
Target Score: 260+
Test date: June 1st
USMLE-Rx: completed, timed/random - 70%
Kaplan: half way through, timed/random - 66%
Kaplan 150 diagnostic: 59% in December

Kaplan has been a mega kill joy - particularly physiology 🙁. Breaks my heart a little every time when I see that I've gotten like 2/6 physio questions right lol.
 
I think in all honesty, as long and grueling as studying for the Step 1 is, I would rather study for this than the MCAT again any day :laugh:. Part of me just wishes my test day would hurry up and get here and the other part of me just wishes I could hermit myself away for another year to study for it.

Student: DO
Target Score: 260+
Test date: June 1st
USMLE-Rx: completed, timed/random - 70%
Kaplan: half way through, timed/random - 66%
Kaplan 150 diagnostic: 59% in December

Kaplan has been a mega kill joy - particularly physiology 🙁. Breaks my heart a little every time when I see that I've gotten like 2/6 physio questions right lol.
Wow I have almost identical stats, also 59 percent in Kaplan in December, i have 63 percent in Kaplan q bank, took the Kaplan 7 hour diagnostic got a 66%, did you take the Kaplan diagnostic, i'm taking my step june 8th.
 
Wow I have almost identical stats, also 59 percent in Kaplan in December, i have 63 percent in Kaplan q bank, took the Kaplan 7 hour diagnostic got a 66%, did you take the Kaplan diagnostic, i'm taking my step june 8th.

Not yet! I'm planning on doing my diagnostic at the end of my kaplan qbank so probably in another 3 weeks or so. I'm hoping as I start to finish up the rest of my systems and once I start hitting UWorld that my scores will go up.
 
Top