Look. many of us have resources all over the place, including KU. It's brash to accuse someone or an institution of discrimination based on sex without clear evidence of such. Many applicants all over the country could be missing out on an opportunity because a poster claims this. Also, I know for a fact they interview many female applicants, so how does this fit in with the discrimination theory? Just to look good?
Let's wait for the match result then.
Many big programs also invite IMG's for interviews to comply with the mission statement " we don't discriminate based on race, gender, etc, and we believe in diversity". After every 5-7 years, these programs take 1 IMG just to look good. Many qualified IMG's would not get any invitation by these programs despite strong CV, multiple publications and no visa issue.
Just check any AMG fellow profile from big program on PubMed or research gate. You will find nothing spectacular about their publication. Unfortunately, it is a bitter truth.