Advertisement - Members don't see this ad
1) I like the idea of grouping them as you describe. In the header put the contact for the published article, and in the narrative put all the same info, with the other contact, for the published abstract. If there is some other database which will link to the abstract, mention it. Alternatively, if the published abstract is from a poster/presentation with the same data, you could list the Poster/Presentation and then mention the published abstract in the same space as that.1. I have an abstract that was published in the Supplement of a major journal that has an impact factor of over 18, but it is not PubMed-searchable. Can I still list it as a publication? I already have another paper that has been published in a journal with an impact factor of over 4, so should I just list only that paper under the Publications category, or can I group that paper with the abstract in the same entry? And if I should group them, since the abstract P.I. is different than the manuscript P.I., who should I list as my contact person?
2. I presented a poster of my lab research findings at my school's research symposium and won an award there. Should I list that separately as its own entry under Awards, or should I just mention it in my lab research entry?
2) A campus poster presentation best belongs in the same space as the associated Research. The Award can go there too, if you have the space, otherwise, why not include it with other Awards, Honors, and Recognitions, rather than giving it its own space (unless you won out over fierce and numerous competitors and/or the prize was impressive).