Use all the free resources available to you from SDN: articles, guides, expert advising, forums discussions, and school research.
If this public sharing of your work occured only during the HS years, I'd suggest you list it under Hobby, but mentioning the competition and award, of course.
If you were working under the direction of someone who was knowledgeable/experienced in teaching CPR, then you're covered. The responsibility for seeing that the lay education provided was correct in concept was not yours, rather, you functioned as an educational aide. Even if the education wasn't standardized, using the usual books, props, and tests that we'd use in the US, an argument could be made that it was better than no CPR education at all. JMO.
It seems to me that it will have more impact if you mention the award in the same space as the experience, since more context will be provided there.
If it isn't obvious, explain what it is. Some schools have school-specific awards that are highly prestigious within that institution, but no one else has heard of them. You might also consider giving the criteria for some awards, as this can vary from school to school, like Phi Beta Kappa.
I think you need to simplify the description of project 2.
You can, but you shouldn't.
1) They could be, but if you've just started to teach skating, it may not be substantive enough to stand on its own. If that is the case, why not mention it at the end of the description of your Hobby/Avocation? Definitely mention it though, as it complements the past activity nicely.
Are you SURE it's a salary? A stipend to use toward living expenses isn't the same as a wage. You don't pay taxes on a stipend and you'll receive a different type of IRS form, as I recall. Be sure you are clear on exactly what category the $3000 falls into.
I'd say that 9-10 spaces are the average filled. So 12 is fine.
1) Using Clinic Volunteer would be fine.
Did you have creative control? Did you have ideas for problem-solving that you brought to the table for a final decision? Using teamwork skills to do a good job doesn't necessarily mean you put no thought into the process on your own. But sometimes it does. You decide.
I agree that working heavy hours throughout college is important to convey, and I think you could clump them, especially those from long ago. If any were special, or you have a lot to say, it could be given its own space.
Special projects, such as you were involved in, are often listed under the "Other" category.
1) Yes.
You are a Research Associate whether summer or academic year, it seems to me, so it's OK to use that term for your title since it applies to the entire experience.
1) "Other" is appropriate.
You can even split it into 3 experiences, as long as you don't double count the hours. Shadowing is usually put under Other, since it helps no one but the shadower and is not considered to be a volunteer activity. An exception would be when the volunteer experience entails helping patients when in the presence of the physician (eg, assisting the doc through translating, scribing, assisting with a procedure). Then one might estimate the % time related to pt interaction+shadowing vs patient interaction without a physician. And it would be important to put the word "Shadowing" in the name of the experience in this latter case.
Since you got academic credit during that time, it was not a volunteer experience. So use the Other category and name the experience something like, "Patient Experience in Student Nursing Rotations".
I would just put a mention of it in the description of the activity.
Yes. You'll need to decide what percent of the time you engage in pure shadowing vs volunteering, vs a combo of the two and try to communicate that accurately, to the best of your ability.
Yes.
1) Teaching
b) of the above would be preferred.
