- Joined
- Aug 4, 2014
- Messages
- 85
- Reaction score
- 14
- Points
- 4,631
- Pre-Medical
Yes you definitely have! I was just asking more so on how to go about describing research, in terms of details. Since mine is my most meaningful activity I'm having some trouble knowing if ADCOMs want to see more detail on specific projects I've worked on, the techniques ive learned and used independently on experiments, results? Or if I should have a basic outline of the two projects I have worked on, a few of the techniques/experiments I have done individually, and my output (manuscript, presentation etc.) [this is what i currently have in a draft]. I thought I would then use my MM space to talk about how research has impacted me and sparked me to continue medical research,etc.
Is this not advised? My other option I was thinking was to use some of the MM space to go into deeper details about my research since 700 characters only allows me to give the bare bare bones of what I have done. Would this be more suited for the interview, I'm assuming.
Is this not advised? My other option I was thinking was to use some of the MM space to go into deeper details about my research since 700 characters only allows me to give the bare bare bones of what I have done. Would this be more suited for the interview, I'm assuming.
2) I'm happy to answer more questions. The MM space is not separate or divided off by a line. Instead there is a Notation to the side, in the margin that says Most Meaningful Experience Remarks. You will want to have a paragraph somewhere around there and then have your narrative flow into what else you have to say in the next 1325 characters. If you are having trouble saying all you've described in just 700 characters, some of it could be incorporated into the MM space, as well as impact, insights, and possibly anecdotes would go well there, too. Have I answered what I think was your unwritten question?