How should I write about data projects at work which very clearly require the same skills and thought process as research (in particular as clinical research) but are used for internal documentation such as methods and procedures? We publish things internally with methods and analysis etc. but because I do not work in our ‘research’ division, it is all process improvement stuff not actually product/basic science research.
As an example, I have taken all of our data on “invalid assays” for quality controls for the last several years, looked at the root cause of every invalid, classified them, identified the worst assays, the worst offenders, assessed trends etc. and produced suggestions which have eventually been implemented.
This is not my primary function in employment, so I have it currently as a one off line in an MME as “I have taken on internal data analytics projects that enhance the delivery of a quality product for our patients.” However, I feel that doesn’t really convey the gravity of the effort put in or the skills needed, particularly in that it has resulted in internal publications. But I can’t really cite “SOP-1262 of big Pharma Corp” as a publication.
Having conducted substantial research, I can attest that this requires the same skills and produces the same sort of information....but is it worthwhile talking about? It isn’t my biggest piece of research and likely won’t make it into secondaries, but it will have basically been the only demonstration of ‘critical thought’ in my application for the last 18 months or so.