Organ Donation
Started by futuresurgeon00
Get help with your application
Use all the free resources available to you from SDN: articles, guides, expert advising, forums discussions, and school research.
Pro's- giving someone life
Cons-technically it is immoral in Christian views, as it is viewed as the ultimate form of mutilation to the human body.
http://biblia.com/bible/esv/1 Corinthians 6.19-20
That is the only thing I can think of.
Advertisement - Members don't see this ad
Pros: Someone might live.. if everything goes well. You also sort of live on in another person.
Cons: Your family will probably be extremely upset at the thought of you being opened and your organs harvested. More delay to the funeral/getting closure.
I signed up to become an organ donor two months ago. Unfortunately, my family, along with many others, still believe in the myth that ER doctors will "let you die" if you're an organ donor.
I think we should have an opt out system instead of an opt in system. There would be a lot more donors and no one would really be forced into doing it since you'd still be notified before it took place provided you have family to notify.
Cons: Your family will probably be extremely upset at the thought of you being opened and your organs harvested. More delay to the funeral/getting closure.
I signed up to become an organ donor two months ago. Unfortunately, my family, along with many others, still believe in the myth that ER doctors will "let you die" if you're an organ donor.
I think we should have an opt out system instead of an opt in system. There would be a lot more donors and no one would really be forced into doing it since you'd still be notified before it took place provided you have family to notify.
I totally agree. I think you are right, and there would be so many more donors in the world.
For me, my mom has always said she wants to donate her body for research and to help in science and medicine, so she would be fine with me donating as well (I think, I haven't really talked about it to my family)...
I find organ donation one of the most generous gifts someone can give; either as a living or cadaveric donor.
Then again, I have no moral, religious or ethical dilemmas with it.
I've been an organ donor ever since I got my first driver's license long ago. College may have done my liver in, but the rest of the organs are in pretty good shape.😛
Then again, I have no moral, religious or ethical dilemmas with it.
I've been an organ donor ever since I got my first driver's license long ago. College may have done my liver in, but the rest of the organs are in pretty good shape.😛
I actually just went up to my parents and asked them whether they were organ donors. My mom and my grandmother are, and I asked them if I could be one when I got my full license. My mom agreed. Never thought it would be that easy.
I'm glad I am going to do something to help someone. That would be nice.
mmmcdowe
Duke of minimal vowels
Staff member
Administrator
Volunteer Staff
Lifetime Donor
15+ Year Member
Call your congressman and push for an opt out program for organ donation.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Organ_donation#Opt-in_vs._opt-out
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Organ_donation#Opt-in_vs._opt-out
I actually have been since I got my license, but just because I want to help someone if I can.
But, now that they said the ER as hard if something happened may not try I am having 2nd thoughts
Complete and utter nonsense.
I have been involved in many trauma resuscitations and never once did I see a victim's wallet/organ donor card etc and call the code early.
As a matter of fact, if I even knew you were an organ donor, I would work harder resuscitating you, to keep those organs perfused and available, should you not survive to need them.
I think organ donation is such a generous gift, you're giving someone the gift of life even if you don't know it. It's just the cycle of life.
This would be false. While there is a growing resurgence of interest in donation after cardiac death (DCD) - and UNOS now requires all hospitals that wish to perform organ transplants to have written policies on it, even if the policy is that the hospital does not perform DCD - the "standard" practice in this country is relegated to donors who are brain dead. In other words, your heart is still beating (which is why being an organ donor would have zero impact on the resuscitation efforts in the ER, OR or ICU).
As for the "delay", it's a matter of hours. As an Pediatric Critical Care fellow, I think the longest I've seen a patient be "maintained" is 12-15 hours, but usually it is quicker than that...and having been on the other side, sitting with patients waiting for new organs, I promise you that every minute seems like an hour once they've gotten word there is an organ coming for them.
At least from my standpoint as a pediatrician, since it is the parents who are usually making the decision (and a lot of times are the ones who actually bring the topic up first), closure usually comes with making the decision. It can be a very powerful component of helping the family start their grieving process when they decide to proceed with donation, often because it's one of the few positives that is easily seen in an otherwise tragic situation.
I think it is incredibly hypocritical and selfish to say that you'd take an organ if you'd needed it, but refuse to donate if something catastrophic happened to you and you were healthy enough that your organs were viable for donation.
Advertisement - Members don't see this ad
After a certain age, are you not eligible to be a donor anymore?
It makes sense but currently im not an organ donor because i never thought about it seriously and it was a very quick question when i got my driver's license. Maybe i will change it in the future.
The way they mutilate your body is horrendous.
Technically, you're dead...so it's not like you can actually feel what's being done to you. In bio today, they showed us a video about organ donation, and how there are two steps, one to sign up and the other, to talk to our family about it, because they are able to say no. How does that work? If you are over the age of sixteen, does your entire family have the right over the choice (your immediate family) or is it your emergency contact? How does that work in terms of legal rights?
mmmcdowe
Duke of minimal vowels
Staff member
Administrator
Volunteer Staff
Lifetime Donor
15+ Year Member
It depends more on the state of your organs, but if there is a cut off it is likely specific to a given organ.
As a future physician..I'm very torn regarding this subject.
Before I got my driver's license, I thought long and hard about it...the pros and the cons. When it came down to it, I decided not to become an organ donor. Due to different illnesses and stomach issues that I have, I felt horrible that there was a possibility that someone could potentially receive my crappy organs..so I said no. Now that I've been thinking about it more, I'm not sure if I'll change my mind next time around or not.
I would say if you're comfortable with it and can essentially sign your organs and/or skin away without regrets, then go for it. You could save someones life.
Before I got my driver's license, I thought long and hard about it...the pros and the cons. When it came down to it, I decided not to become an organ donor. Due to different illnesses and stomach issues that I have, I felt horrible that there was a possibility that someone could potentially receive my crappy organs..so I said no. Now that I've been thinking about it more, I'm not sure if I'll change my mind next time around or not.
I would say if you're comfortable with it and can essentially sign your organs and/or skin away without regrets, then go for it. You could save someones life.
D
deleted532329
I see little is any cons to organ donations.
Similar to giving blood it is screened for potential health problems that would make the organ unsuitable for donation, so there is less risk in regards to the patient.
As a person who has had to use blood donations and am forever grateful to whomever has taken time out of their day to help save someone's life, I think organ donations are just as amazing.
I'd rather postpone a funeral by a few days while they harvest some usable organs to save someone else's life.
Similar to giving blood it is screened for potential health problems that would make the organ unsuitable for donation, so there is less risk in regards to the patient.
As a person who has had to use blood donations and am forever grateful to whomever has taken time out of their day to help save someone's life, I think organ donations are just as amazing.
I'd rather postpone a funeral by a few days while they harvest some usable organs to save someone else's life.
If it helps, even if someone designates themselves as an organ donor, their organs are not automatically accepted. Multidisciplinary teams trained in the evaluation of potential donors are called in. If the family decides to donate, then the process includes a consideration of past medical history. So specially-trained teams of professionals will decide if your [likely not as crappy as you think] organs are suitable for donation.
And to echo what WS posted, I can't remember a time when I've actually seen someone's wallet/card/license during a resus; it gets scooped up by the registration people/security while the resus is ongoing. Regardless if you don't make it out of the ED/trauma bay then you can't donate. Finally, it's considered quite a faux pas for a medical professional caring for a patient to even mention donation/Donor Services before a patient is declared brain dead. At my institution (and I warrant and most if not all others as well) the people who handle that are an entirely separate team; they get notified that there is a potential donor candidate once the medical diagnosis of brain death is made and then they take it from there. When making your decision about being a donor, please be assured it is a complete urban legend that any healthcare professional would let someone expire prematurely to allocate their organs elsewhere.
Last edited:
And this thread is officially dead....-__- RIP thread :'( You will be missed. :'(....
.
Last edited:
There is definitely a lot of misinformation in this thread, and a fellow in Transplant Research and an aspiring Transplant Surgeon, I figure I need to correct some things... I'm gonna link some references that may not be acceptable to all. If anyone had interest in reading the article linked and can't find it, PM me...
Myth 1 seen: It's against Christianity
http://journals.lww.com/co-transpla...ng_donor_families__culture,_religion__.3.aspx
Most religious leaders are actually very pro-donation. The most orthodox of christians do consider the body and soul as one, they do not accept the diagnosis of brain death and object to organ donation. However, the principle of altruism, or 'love for other people' is interpreted differently in different groups, and so Roman Catholics are positive about organ donation, orthodox Protestant groups one can donate organs based on voluntary love for other people. Generally the individual believer makes her or his own choice
Myth 2: The way they mutilate your body is horrendous
This requires no link, no source. Having been a part of a dozen procurements myself, and present at least a dozen more, this is the furthest from the truth. I guess it does depend on your definition of mutilate as well. While it is an extensive surgery, the end result is that there can still be an open casket funeral, so that should tell you all you need to know about mutilation. The procedure is significantly less "mutilating" than an autopsy, and significantly less "mutilating" than what you will do as a medical student to anatomy lab cadavers.
Myth 3: Family upset/delay in funeral/etc
http://www.ingentaconnect.com/content/sesc/tas/2012/00000078/00000003/art00036
Arrangements do get delayed slightly. Average donor management time is about 23 +/- 9 hours. But the sharing networks do work closely with families and work closely to satisfy wishes regarding the timing and desire for funeral arrangements. And again, if the case was going to go to the medical examiner (ie, the death was suspicious), the funeral arrangements were going to be delayed anyway.
The sharing networks also have a wide range of councilors and staff that do a great job with families regarding education and support. Most people are very pleased and comforted by their efforts, and it shows with higher rates of donation
Myth 4: After a certain age you can not be a donor anymore
http://journals.lww.com/transplantj...ctogenarian_Livers_Safely_Expands_the.21.aspx
Each organ procurement organization sets their own criteria for whom they will accept to attempt to be a donor, and each transplant center sets their own criteria and weighs each case on its own. That being said, there are typical age cut offs that are organ specific. I really only know the experience of the new jersey sharing network, but anyone over 75 years old is ruled out. Pancreas is ruled out over 45 years old. And when you get above 50-55 or so, rarely will a heart or lungs be accepted. But as my link shows, some 80+ year olds can still donate a liver...
Myth 5: Organ donors won't get as good of care
As Winged Scapula stated, this is patently false. There is not 1 bit of truth to this statement, and if anything the opposite is true because donors whose hearts aren't beating aren't any good to anyone (donation after cardiac death happens only in controlled settings, with withdraw of life support in the operating room. If a patient codes and is not resuscitated, they will not be able to be an organ donor...)
Advertisement - Members don't see this ad
Nice...🙂 ...👍 👍 😉
And, don't worry. It was 🙂
Last edited:
amazing post. Thanks for shedding some light 👍 so I'm guessing you're for donation 😉
I'm against implied consent funny enough, even though I know it would increase donation rates, it would remove the altruism from the system (although I wouldn't be opposed to compensating the donors/donor families...)
http://jmp.oxfordjournals.org/content/35/2/154.short
What I am for is a re-appraisal of the dead-donor rule (that is, in order to procure organs, the donor must be dead). Why is this the case? Why can someone decide to withdraw care and die, but can not decide to allow to procurement of their organs even if they are "alive". Just give me enough "stuff" (analgesia, anesthetics) so I am comfortable and don't feel/know a thing, and let me pass "knowing" that I was able to give the best gift possible. A major philosophical debate to be had, no doubt, but those are my feelings
Hmm... interesting (and I missed it on my other large post)...
Laws vary state by state. I believe most states currently (it is the case in New Jersey), that for individuals over 18, if you state on your drivers license or otherwise sign an organ donor card, then your family is not allowed to override your wishes. Historically, and I believe it to still be the truth in some states, next-of-kin was allowed to override your stated wishes with regards to organ donation. If you have not designated yourself as a donor, the decision always goes to the next-of-kin, so it wouldn't be your entire family or your emergency contact, but the person legally responsible for your decisions. While you can via a living will or other means state beforehand who you would like to be your surragate decision maker, if you do not, the hierchy goes (in general, I am sure there is some variation)
1) Spouse (depending on states and civil union/marriage laws, this may or may not count a same sex partner 😱)
2) Adult children
3) Parents
4) Siblings in order of age
after that it definitely gets fuzzy
but the legal standing of the donor designation for minors... that's a new one for me. I'm sure there are definitely laws regarding it, just none that I know the specifics of.
Yes, I was wondering that because in Canada your family is able to override your wishes (that is why they stress so much on the two steps - making sure your family is aware of your intentions, because without that, they have the right to say no, and you signing up for the process was a waste.)
