orgo question

This forum made possible through the generous support of SDN members, donors, and sponsors. Thank you.

hope_to_match

Full Member
10+ Year Member
Joined
Feb 7, 2011
Messages
1,145
Reaction score
220
Points
4,651
Location
New York
  1. Resident [Any Field]
Advertisement - Members don't see this ad


wouldn't Cl end up on the tertiary carbon due to a hydride shift? Thanks
 
Since it's in ether it is in an aprotic solvent which will only be sn2 or e2, so no carbocation or rearrangements. And it is sn2 because hcl is a strong nucleophile. Hope this helps
 
Since it's in ether it is in an aprotic solvent which will only be sn2 or e2, so no carbocation or rearrangements. And it is sn2 because hcl is a strong nucleophile. Hope this helps

thanks it does..

i was confusing this with a reaction with just HCl with no ether. In that case there would be rearrangement right? It's rxn#1 on the alkene list from Chad..am I correct?
 
Also, on that reaction, the Cl is less selective than br so you will get a mixture of products opposed to the Br that will have the most substituted carbon being the location the halogen (Br) is added.
 
Also, on that reaction, the Cl is less selective than br so you will get a mixture of products opposed to the Br that will have the most substituted carbon being the location the halogen (Br) is added.

doesnt that only apply to free radical halogenation?
 
True, I guess I just assumed they were the same since the carbocation and radicals get stabilized with the same effects. I bet you are right, the radicals must be a special case. Good call.
 
True, I guess I just assumed they were the same since the carbocation and radicals get stabilized with the same effects. I bet you are right, the radicals must be a special case. Good call.

well for free radical halogenation the reactants are different (Br2/CL2 with light or heat or ROOR)

no problem. i think discussing things makes this stuff stick if you know what i mean
 
Top Bottom