Hi all,
I am an MS3 currently thinking about multiple fields, among them neurology and PM&R. I have been reading a lot about PM&R and been in touch with several PM&R docs to try to understand more about what is done in practice. I think part of my problem in understanding the field properly is that it overlaps with so many fields that it is hard for me to understand what they do differently than a non-PM&R doc.
The main difference that gets mentioned constantly is that PM&R focuses on "the whole person" and "function," but the specifics of that often seem to consist of various physical therapies that often ends up sounding to me like you are a rehab coordinator. But I'm sure that there is a lot more to it than that!
To give a specific example to make it concrete--I am interested in outpatient neuro much more than inpatient, specifically I find neuromuscular diseases interesting. So what would I do differently if I was a neurologist vs PM&R doctor? Don't both want to preserve functionality/slow disease progression/etc.?
Another part of what I don't understand is that I have seen references to the large range of outpatient practices in PM&R, even to the point of it being said that it could resemble a neuro outpatient practice or an ortho outpatient practice etc. That really surprises me. The implication is that if you specifically like these sorts of things then you may as well go the PM&R route (as the residency sounds easier than ortho/neuro/etc. Can that be? It seems strange to me...so again, I think I am just missing the boat on PM&R.
I know I've covered a few different questions here. In short: What does PM&R do differently than other apparently overlapping fields in practice? Would/Could it really be very similar to the outpatient versions of orhto/neuro/etc.?
I am an MS3 currently thinking about multiple fields, among them neurology and PM&R. I have been reading a lot about PM&R and been in touch with several PM&R docs to try to understand more about what is done in practice. I think part of my problem in understanding the field properly is that it overlaps with so many fields that it is hard for me to understand what they do differently than a non-PM&R doc.
The main difference that gets mentioned constantly is that PM&R focuses on "the whole person" and "function," but the specifics of that often seem to consist of various physical therapies that often ends up sounding to me like you are a rehab coordinator. But I'm sure that there is a lot more to it than that!
To give a specific example to make it concrete--I am interested in outpatient neuro much more than inpatient, specifically I find neuromuscular diseases interesting. So what would I do differently if I was a neurologist vs PM&R doctor? Don't both want to preserve functionality/slow disease progression/etc.?
Another part of what I don't understand is that I have seen references to the large range of outpatient practices in PM&R, even to the point of it being said that it could resemble a neuro outpatient practice or an ortho outpatient practice etc. That really surprises me. The implication is that if you specifically like these sorts of things then you may as well go the PM&R route (as the residency sounds easier than ortho/neuro/etc. Can that be? It seems strange to me...so again, I think I am just missing the boat on PM&R.
I know I've covered a few different questions here. In short: What does PM&R do differently than other apparently overlapping fields in practice? Would/Could it really be very similar to the outpatient versions of orhto/neuro/etc.?