Seems like everyone who goes into an interview will get waitlisted in some way or another if they are not accepted. Do you think this is the norm?
Seems like everyone who goes into an interview will get waitlisted in some way or another if they are not accepted. Do you think this is the norm?
Seems like everyone who goes into an interview will get waitlisted in some way or another if they are not accepted. Do you think this is the norm?
No way man. It might seem like that from these forums, but that's probably just because good applicants tend to post here.
I know University of Houston College of Pharmacy takes about half of the people it interviews (roughly).
I think Texas Tech takes a little more than half of those that interview, not sure though....
Don't feel safe just because you got an interview... I know I didn't![]()
I think you may be misinterpreting my question.
Say a school interviews 100 applicants. After the adcom meeting, they will accept 50. Do you think ALL the other 50 will be waitlisted or will some be rejected immediately? It seems like you won't get a straight out rejection after the interview,
I think you may be misinterpreting my question.
Say a school interviews 100 applicants. After the adcom meeting, they will accept 50. Do you think ALL the other 50 will be waitlisted or will some be rejected immediately? It seems like you won't get a straight out rejection after the interview,
I think all schools put everyone who are not accepted right away on the waitlist. They probably do that just in case of high turnovers in the end. I was on the waitlist for 3 schools but eventually got into one. I'm still hoping to get into my number 1 choice. 🙂
No, not all schools do that. One in particular went like this:
1200 applied
300 interviewed
128 accepted
50 waitlisted
122 rejected