- Joined
- Aug 7, 2008
- Messages
- 148
- Reaction score
- 3
Although it has been purported that there are 15-20 programs across the country that support endovascular training for neurologists, this is a half-truth. Most of these programs have been inconsistent in their support to train vascular neurology graduates. I wanted to make a list of those programs with a reputation of consistently training neurologists in vascular procedures to increase awareness in future graduates about them. From what I know, the following programs have been consistent in their support in the last few yrs:
1) Univ. of Minnesota: 2 endovascular graduates each yr, always taken neurologists for the last 3-4 yrs. Tried to get ACGME approval for a third position this yr, but couldnt do so because of lack of funds. The only ACGME approved NIR program in neurology.
2) Univ. of Iowa: 1 fellow each yr. Always a neurologistfor the last 3-4 yrs.
3) MCW: 2 fellows each yr. Always recruited from VN/NCC.
4) UPMC: 2-4 fellows per yr. Always recruited 1-2 neurologists per year for the last 3-4 yrs.
5) Case Western: 1 fellow per yr. 1st VN graduate passing out of NIR this yr. 2010, 2011 fellows are from VN.
There are many other programs which profess to taking neurologists; like CCF, Jackson-Miami, UMDNJ, UCLA, Boston Univ., SUNY-Buffalo, NYU, UIC, Cedar-Sinai, Wayne State, St. Luke's-Roosevelt & MGH. Though they may have trained a few VN fellows in the past, they have not done so consistently every yr because of their biases towards neurologists. Please add any other programs that you know of to this list with the evidence backing your statements & not just what you have heard. We should discuss the pros & cons of these programs.
Please stick to the subject of this thread rather than making this a general discussion on Neuroendovascular training, Vascular Neurology training or Neurocritical care training.
1) Univ. of Minnesota: 2 endovascular graduates each yr, always taken neurologists for the last 3-4 yrs. Tried to get ACGME approval for a third position this yr, but couldnt do so because of lack of funds. The only ACGME approved NIR program in neurology.
2) Univ. of Iowa: 1 fellow each yr. Always a neurologistfor the last 3-4 yrs.
3) MCW: 2 fellows each yr. Always recruited from VN/NCC.
4) UPMC: 2-4 fellows per yr. Always recruited 1-2 neurologists per year for the last 3-4 yrs.
5) Case Western: 1 fellow per yr. 1st VN graduate passing out of NIR this yr. 2010, 2011 fellows are from VN.
There are many other programs which profess to taking neurologists; like CCF, Jackson-Miami, UMDNJ, UCLA, Boston Univ., SUNY-Buffalo, NYU, UIC, Cedar-Sinai, Wayne State, St. Luke's-Roosevelt & MGH. Though they may have trained a few VN fellows in the past, they have not done so consistently every yr because of their biases towards neurologists. Please add any other programs that you know of to this list with the evidence backing your statements & not just what you have heard. We should discuss the pros & cons of these programs.
Please stick to the subject of this thread rather than making this a general discussion on Neuroendovascular training, Vascular Neurology training or Neurocritical care training.
Last edited: