- Joined
- Feb 8, 2002
- Messages
- 1,667
- Reaction score
- 6
My biased opinion on programs that are incredible for both pulmonary and critical care:
East coast: Penn
West coast: U Washington
South: Vanderbilt
The middle: Pitt
Overall impressions:
Penn: solid in every respect. Their clinical training has no gaps. Incredible MICU training, transplant, interventional, ILD, thoracic malignancy, pulmonary HTN, etc. From a research standpoint, best fellowship offers on the east coast. Guaranteed formal research training in translational research or clinical epidemiology or health services research. Home of one of the Robert Wood Johnson Clinical Scholars programs. Young and fun MICU attendings that are very successful from a research standpoint. Chairman is a clinician so isn't over emphasizing basic science. I'm very biased, but it is an awesome place.
Partner's: Fellowship at all 3 hospitals. Really great faculty at Brigham (Augustine and Tricia Kritek) that are very invested in fellows' scholarship. Clinically seemed pretty strong. Most fellows had to bend their interests to meet those of the faculty. Great track record for training academicians. Great place.
Hopkins: Very strong research emphasis, which is mostly basic science. New MICU tower looks like it will be a great place to work. Weakness includes ICU outcomes and health services research. Don't trust that the program leadership values clinical training as much as some of the other top caliber places.
Vanderbilt: Have a friend there who is a senior fellow. Fantastic ICU training. Solid pulmonary. Has a research track. Not so sure about the track record for M.S. in research possibilities.
Pitt: Fantastic critical care training. Pulmonary is pretty good. Fellows take in house call every so often. One of our attendings who came from there said it was b/c they couldn't trust their housestaff to run the unit by themselves overnight. Solid transplant. Pretty good research opportunities, but not as good as some other programs.
UW: The classic example of a phenomenal program. Have a friend there who's super happy. Busy robust place with a track record of training successful people. Best place on the west coast. Fantastic graduate training in research methodology.
UCSF: Very basic science oriented. Semi-closed ICU shared by anesthesiology is not a plus for me. Great exposure to pulmonary-ID at SFGH. Fellows are awesome, fun, and smart. But, they've had to bend their interests a lot to meet faculty interests. Not a lot of formal training in clinical epidemiology or outcomes research.
Colorado: Fantastic pulm. ICU not as good as pulm.
UCLA: Don't know a lot of details but have heard good things.
Overall, fellowship programs reputations are in the eyes of the beholder. Different things stand out for different people. I was looking for a place that had no weak spots clinically (had interventional, had transplant, had ILD, had MICU where fellows didn't take in house call) as well as opportunities for formal training in research (Master degree). Lots of good programs out there. Have fun everyone.
East coast: Penn
West coast: U Washington
South: Vanderbilt
The middle: Pitt
Overall impressions:
Penn: solid in every respect. Their clinical training has no gaps. Incredible MICU training, transplant, interventional, ILD, thoracic malignancy, pulmonary HTN, etc. From a research standpoint, best fellowship offers on the east coast. Guaranteed formal research training in translational research or clinical epidemiology or health services research. Home of one of the Robert Wood Johnson Clinical Scholars programs. Young and fun MICU attendings that are very successful from a research standpoint. Chairman is a clinician so isn't over emphasizing basic science. I'm very biased, but it is an awesome place.
Partner's: Fellowship at all 3 hospitals. Really great faculty at Brigham (Augustine and Tricia Kritek) that are very invested in fellows' scholarship. Clinically seemed pretty strong. Most fellows had to bend their interests to meet those of the faculty. Great track record for training academicians. Great place.
Hopkins: Very strong research emphasis, which is mostly basic science. New MICU tower looks like it will be a great place to work. Weakness includes ICU outcomes and health services research. Don't trust that the program leadership values clinical training as much as some of the other top caliber places.
Vanderbilt: Have a friend there who is a senior fellow. Fantastic ICU training. Solid pulmonary. Has a research track. Not so sure about the track record for M.S. in research possibilities.
Pitt: Fantastic critical care training. Pulmonary is pretty good. Fellows take in house call every so often. One of our attendings who came from there said it was b/c they couldn't trust their housestaff to run the unit by themselves overnight. Solid transplant. Pretty good research opportunities, but not as good as some other programs.
UW: The classic example of a phenomenal program. Have a friend there who's super happy. Busy robust place with a track record of training successful people. Best place on the west coast. Fantastic graduate training in research methodology.
UCSF: Very basic science oriented. Semi-closed ICU shared by anesthesiology is not a plus for me. Great exposure to pulmonary-ID at SFGH. Fellows are awesome, fun, and smart. But, they've had to bend their interests a lot to meet faculty interests. Not a lot of formal training in clinical epidemiology or outcomes research.
Colorado: Fantastic pulm. ICU not as good as pulm.
UCLA: Don't know a lot of details but have heard good things.
Overall, fellowship programs reputations are in the eyes of the beholder. Different things stand out for different people. I was looking for a place that had no weak spots clinically (had interventional, had transplant, had ILD, had MICU where fellows didn't take in house call) as well as opportunities for formal training in research (Master degree). Lots of good programs out there. Have fun everyone.