*Rejection Letters 2006*

This forum made possible through the generous support of SDN members, donors, and sponsors. Thank you.
phremius said:
undergrad GPA has no bearing on how smart you are, I've met plenty of light-bulbs absent in their brains people that touted high ug GPAs...

Yeah, and I'm not convinced that the DAT shows how smart you are either. It tests only a limited amount of material, and all you have to do is study it. Maybe it shows your ability to reach a goal, but it's no test of brain power.
 
drhobie7 said:
Well, alright. But don't let it happen again! Carry on......I'm just kidding of course.....just busting your balls.

you busted my balls. I'll try to prevent it from happening again. :laugh: :laugh:
[My math isn't so great. I'll probably make a similar mistake again. oh well, I guess I should take a couple of math classes in Spring. I'm glad (for many schools) the math score is not as important as the other DAT scores]
 
dat_student said:
you busted my balls. I'll try to prevent it from happening again. :laugh: :laugh:
[My math isn't so great. I'll probably make a similar mistake again. oh well, I guess I should take a couple of math classes in Spring. I'm glad (for many schools) the math score is not as important as the other DAT scores]

Dat_student, why do you post erroneous stats about yourself? At first you didn't have anything telling of your stats in your signature and then you had a gpa, which as low as it is, is hard to believe due to the interviews that you were supposedly granted. Now you have posted your supposed DAT scores that are well, frankly, low. Either you are lying now, have been lying all along (troll), or your last name is Christenson. Own up.
 
oldboy said:
Dat_student, why do you post erroneous stats about yourself? At first you didn't have anything telling of your stats in your signature and then you had a gpa, which as low as it is, is hard to believe due to the interviews that you were supposedly granted. Now you have posted your supposed DAT scores that are well, frankly, low. Either you are lying now, have been lying all along (troll), or your last name is Christenson. Own up.

My last name is Christenson. 😉
[I think I got lucky. I don't think my stats are great. As I have said 100 times before, many SDNers are a lot smarter than me. I waste too much. SDN is really addictive. I need to quit this before entering any dental school (i.e. if given a chance). Plus, as drhobie7 said my math is just horrible.]
 
My math DAT is really quite horrible, but no interviewers mentioned it. I would think that since a lot of it is "business" math, they'd be interested to know how you might be able to handle finances in the future. Do you think they really don't care as much? I know that any poor score isn't something to pass off, but they seemed more concerned with other things....
 
It is true, many schools are willing to overlook a poor to average math score on the DAT. However, I don't think Harvard is one of them. To be a dentist all you need to know is +, -, X, /. And even then you'll probably have a computer program doing it all for you.
 
They never brought it up at my Harvard interview, but perhaps that is one of the silent disappointments they'll be holding against me come decision time. Who knows?
 
drhobie7 said:
...To be a dentist all you need to know is +, -, X, /...

Sometimes I can't even do that. :laugh: :laugh:
 
dentwannabe said:
yea yea stop being modest.. i bet you teach calc on the side.

i wouldn't call him modest. the way he's acting is so arrogant...although it appears to be modest...
 
r0entgen said:
i wouldn't call him modest. the way he's acting is so arrogant...although it appears to be modest...

I wouldn't call myself modest or arrogant. I am a terrible mathematician. Since I know my weaknesses I think I can safely conclude that.
 
dat_student said:
I wouldn't call myself modest or arrogant. I am a terrible mathematician. Since I know my weaknesses I think I can safely conclude that.

dat_student, you should take off that "kick me" sign on ur back.
 
Received the rejection letter (pre-interview) yesterday from Michigan. Sigh.....
 
rejected pre-interview for U PENN.... didn't want to move to Pennsylvania anyway ;-)
 
Coolfishdent said:
rejected pre-interview for U PENN.... didn't want to move to Pennsylvania anyway ;-)
:scared:
They rejected you with those stats!?
There's something wrong.
 
wow, it almost seems like all upenn cares about is gpa. they rejected so many applicants w/ 20+ scores already... looks like i'll be getting the rejection letter soon.
 
Coolfishdent said:
rejected pre-interview for U PENN.... didn't want to move to Pennsylvania anyway ;-)
😱 😱 You have great stats!
 
the whole process gets more random as the days go by!
 
Coolfishdent said:
rejected pre-interview for U PENN.... didn't want to move to Pennsylvania anyway ;-)

that's the spirit.
 
Thanks guys... at this point I just want to get into somewhere.... hopefully one of the NJ/NYC schools so I can stay local. I'm thinking my rejection maybe had something to do with my 2 C+s (chem 2 and physics 1)... other than that, I feel like the whole process is pretty random
 
Coolfishdent said:
rejected pre-interview for U PENN.... didn't want to move to Pennsylvania anyway ;-)

wow, that's shocking. gosh, what are dental schools looking for these days. 😕
 
Coolfishdent said:
Thanks guys... at this point I just want to get into somewhere.... hopefully one of the NJ/NYC schools so I can stay local. I'm thinking my rejection maybe had something to do with my 2 C+s (chem 2 and physics 1)... other than that, I feel like the whole process is pretty random

just want to say hi and glad to meet at BU.
Best luck to you
 
Coolfishdent said:
Thanks guys... at this point I just want to get into somewhere.... hopefully one of the NJ/NYC schools so I can stay local. I'm thinking my rejection maybe had something to do with my 2 C+s (chem 2 and physics 1)... other than that, I feel like the whole process is pretty random

did u repeat those classes you got C+s in?
 
I can only imagine that having applied late, that may of been a factor. Did you spend alot of time on the personal statement and get stellar reccs? I know PENN cares about an applicant in their entirety, including personal statement, reccomendations, GPA...DAT, and shadowing. Sorry to hear about the rejection though...I'm sure you'll be going somewhere great with those stats. Good luck!
 
PDizzle said:
Nobody knows what AZ wants cept the adcoms at AZ. The quoted post wasn't addressed to me but I got an interview and havn't gotten a rejection letter yet (well over 30 days) so I assume its lookn pretty good for me. But who the hell knows.

My stats aren't all that great:

20/20/21
3.5, 3.4 sci
Biochem major from UC Berkeley

Not bad but certainly not the greatest compared to some of these peeps on SDN.

I also had military experience which I think they liked and they also told me my age was a plus (Im 35).


Just to add a little rant. People are obsessed with stats. I talked to many adcoms and they all said the same thing. Once your stats get past a level the school thinks is competitve, they move one to other things in your ap. So a 25 DAT isn't neccessarily that much better then a 20. This came right from the lady at UoP, which is known for their heavy weight on the DAT.

She said that some people have great stats but have other missing elements that the school deems important.

So what am I saying??...nothing. I'm bored and an idiot. Disregard everything I just said.

Hopefully my age will be a plus too, I am 32; also a biochem major and I am planning to take DAT in spring. I am applying in 2006 and I was curious about the stats b/c I have seen many people in this forum who got 20s @ DAT without getting any interviews…And by the way, your stats are good enough, don’t worry!!!
 
I agree that UPENN is probably skewed towards stellar GPAs ... I also got denied with a 20+ DAT (AA 24, scores between 20 - 29), but a 3.54 overall and 3.3 sci gpa. I added them later than most of my other schools as well, in mid August and then they had a difficult time receiving my recs ... so that was a factor I'm sure. My p.s. and recs certainly did not hold me back though. Luckily, I got interviews at each of my top choices, so no whining from me.
 
rals said:
hey, thanks for the info, and i think you've got nothing to lose if you do want to go there by writing a letter. other than a little time. i hope it works out for you....

this life we've chosen is hard to get a hold of.
Hey, I am very sorry for you, I am really impressed with your DAT...and the rest. This people are crazy!!! Wish you :luck:
 
"wake me up, when november ends ... " :laugh: hahah creative

btw, your dat scores are awesome...i feel like i dont have a chance at u penn then
 
I think UPenn rejected me indirectly via the silent treatment. There is no way that my application is still under review since early August... 😳
 
LadyxJC said:
I think UPenn rejected me indirectly via the silent treatment. There is no way that my application is still under review since early August... 😳


Don't worry about it. I never thought I'd get snubbed by Columbia but hey, it happened. I guess it's the price I pay for applying too late and having my app sent out Sept. 26. It wasn't my fault, my transcripts were messed up 🙁
 
FIRST, I don't mean to offend anyone.
From my observation, a lot of people with 20+ have been rejected from UPenn. Many SDNers are concerning that UPenn cares about high GPAs. However, I would like to think that UPenn wants a POSTIVE CORRELATION with your GPA and DAT. Most of you rejected with 20+ DAT scores have GPAs not as competitive as their DAT scores. So, I would like to think of it as UPenn expectes not only high DATs, but also high GPAs. After writing my thought, I basically re-stated what other SDNers are saying (UPenn wants high GPAs).

I guess I'm DUMB~~!!!! :scared:
 
swanlake said:
FIRST, I don't mean to offend anyone.
From my observation, a lot of people with 20+ have been rejected from UPenn. Many SDNers are concerning that UPenn cares about high GPAs. However, I would like to think that UPenn wants a POSTIVE CORRELATION with your GPA and DAT. Most of you rejected with 20+ DAT scores have GPAs not as competitive as their DAT scores. So, I would like to think of it as UPenn expectes not only high DATs, but also high GPAs. After writing my thought, I basically re-stated what other SDNers are saying (UPenn wants high GPAs).

I guess I'm DUMB~~!!!! :scared:

Well, the talk of both high GPA and DAT score of course is true. I mean, who wouldn't pick a candidate with high scores across the board? But, my experience with UPenn leaves me unsure of what they're really looking for in a prospective student. UPenn rejected me a while ago without even granting me an interview, but my GPA and DAT are both probably in the top 2-5% of all dental school applicants. (AADSAS calculated GPA of 3.87 and DAT score of 23/22 AA/PAT). I know people here have been rejected with great DAT scores, but then people pointed out that it's probably b/c their GPA wasn't the greatest. Well, I guess my post somewhat disproves that theory. Of course I understand that there are people out there with better stats than me, but I thought mine was good enough to at least be granted an interview at any school. The intention of this post is not so much to brag, but moreso to first express a bit of built of frustration/confusion with UPenn that I've been holding in for a while and second to suggest that maybe UPenn isn't only looking for high GPA and high DAT. If I remember correctly, LadyxJC also has both a high GPA and DAT score, and she has yet to hear back from UPenn... So, what is UPenn looking for to extend INTERVIEW invitations? I really have no clue, which is what is so frustrating. Ivy Leagues just hate me for some strange reason. You'll just have to trust me on that one, haha. 😳

LadyxJC -- as a word of encouragement, you haven't heard from UPenn yet, so don't just assume you're rejected. You still have hope. I know what you're going through because it took UPenn about 3 months to finally get back to me with the shocking news that they weren't even going to grant me an interview, and it sucks hardcore sitting there waiting, but hopefully your outcome will be a better one than mine. Should they deny you an interview, you'll get a nice thin letter in the mail praising your amazing stats but saying they unfortunately are unable to grant you an interview for only God knows what reason. Until keep your chin up; you never know what can happen, and I wish you better luck than I had with them 🙂 If the worst does happen, know that it's UPenn's loss and you have my empathy.

Moral of this ridiculously long post: Screw UPenn. 😀
 
jaerob said:
LadyxJC -- as a word of encouragement, you haven't heard from UPenn yet, so don't just assume you're rejected. You still have hope. I know what you're going through because it took UPenn about 3 months to finally get back to me with the shocking news that they weren't even going to grant me an interview, and it sucks hardcore sitting there waiting, but hopefully your outcome will be a better one than mine. Should they deny you an interview, you'll get a nice thin letter in the mail praising your amazing stats but saying they unfortunately are unable to grant you an interview for only God knows what reason. Until keep your chin up; you never know what can happen, and I wish you better luck than I had with them 🙂 If the worst does happen, know that it's UPenn's loss and you have my empathy.

Moral of this ridiculously long post: Screw UPenn. 😀

Thanx jaerob. Yeah, there was a point where I was very anxious to hear back from them but I've gotten over that stage now and am at least hoping to receive a thin envelop in the mail. But I really do not understand why I have yet to hear from them. Its been more than 3 months and not to brag but I also consider myself to have consistently competitive scores both for gpa and DAT. I just hope my file is not forgotten about or lost, in the corner of someone's office. There really is no way for me to prove that my application had been neglected if that is the case. Therefore, I'd rather wish they review my file and decide to reject me for whatever reason than to not be sent anything because my file is being neglected.
 
jaerob said:
Well, the talk of both high GPA and DAT score of course is true. I mean, who wouldn't pick a candidate with high scores across the board? But, my experience with UPenn leaves me unsure of what they're really looking for in a prospective student. UPenn rejected me a while ago without even granting me an interview, but my GPA and DAT are both probably in the top 2-5% of all dental school applicants. (AADSAS calculated GPA of 3.87 and DAT score of 23/22 AA/PAT). I know people here have been rejected with great DAT scores, but then people pointed out that it's probably b/c their GPA wasn't the greatest. Well, I guess my post somewhat disproves that theory. Of course I understand that there are people out there with better stats than me, but I thought mine was good enough to at least be granted an interview at any school. The intention of this post is not so much to brag, but moreso to first express a bit of built of frustration/confusion with UPenn that I've been holding in for a while and second to suggest that maybe UPenn isn't only looking for high GPA and high DAT. If I remember correctly, LadyxJC also has both a high GPA and DAT score, and she has yet to hear back from UPenn... So, what is UPenn looking for to extend INTERVIEW invitations? I really have no clue, which is what is so frustrating. Ivy Leagues just hate me for some strange reason. You'll just have to trust me on that one, haha. 😳

LadyxJC -- as a word of encouragement, you haven't heard from UPenn yet, so don't just assume you're rejected. You still have hope. I know what you're going through because it took UPenn about 3 months to finally get back to me with the shocking news that they weren't even going to grant me an interview, and it sucks hardcore sitting there waiting, but hopefully your outcome will be a better one than mine. Should they deny you an interview, you'll get a nice thin letter in the mail praising your amazing stats but saying they unfortunately are unable to grant you an interview for only God knows what reason. Until keep your chin up; you never know what can happen, and I wish you better luck than I had with them 🙂 If the worst does happen, know that it's UPenn's loss and you have my empathy.

Moral of this ridiculously long post: Screw UPenn. 😀


Hey, Jaerob
I don't know whether this is going to help you or not. I just hope that it helps you to understand admission processes. I have a uncle who is in an admission committee member in one of Ivy League schools. He explained admission processes at his institution. However, it's for college, not for dental school.

1. Schools randomly distribute your application to two committee members. Two members will decide whether they want you or not.
2. Most schools have 25-40 admission committee members from various backgrounds. They are not neccessarily faculty members at its institution. They will decide whether you are good enough for their schools based on your paper application and an interview report from your interviewer.
3. Finally, admission office decideds the final cut. When they decide the final decisions, they look at diversity of classes, etc.

The last step is kinda tricky. He told me that each school has brackets for different levels of applicants. For example, they decide to draw 25% of their applicants from SAT score range of 1540-1600. Then, 25% from 1400-1530, etc. Each school has its own brackets. Let's suppose you have 1590 on your SAT. If the school has already filled their 25% 1540-1600 bracket, you won't get in because your bracket is already filled not because you are not a qualified applicant. Schools wants to have a diversified class. That's why they are doing it. For example, for Harvard college, usually around 20,000 or a little more students apply, and a quarter of their applicants have 1600 on their SAT. The Harvad college class size is around 1100. If Harvard college accepts applicants based on their GPAs and SATs, their SAT score average should be 1600. Because 5000 out of 20,000 have 1600 on their SATs and their class size is only 1100. However, when you look at USNEWS, SAT average for Harvard college is 1490. In some sense, it's UNFAIR for highly qualified applicants. On the other hand, schools want to have a diversified class. When I am talking about numbers, I am ignoring applicants having connections and extraordinary extracurricular activities.

I'm not bragging, but when I was applying for colleges, I had 1530 SATs, and 3.99 GPA, a number of APs with 5, Student Government, Varsity sports, etc. However, I didn't get accepted at top 10 schools. Back then, my uncle wasn't on the committee ( 😡 ). However, he told me that if I had gotten 1470-1490, I might had a better chance. He said, 1530 is high, but not good enough for a upper bracket. If I had gotten a little below 1500, I would have been placed in a mid-bracket, which I would have a better chance. It's PAST. WHO CARES~~@@!!!

So, I assume that UPenn has already filled their high-upper bracket with 23+ applicants. That's my guess. What do you think guys? 😱
 
swanlake said:
Hey, Jaerob
I don't know whether this is going to help you or not. I just hope that it helps you to understand admission processes. I have a uncle who is in an admission committee member in one of Ivy League schools. He explained admission processes at his institution. However, it's for college, not for dental school.

1. Schools randomly distribute your application to two committee members. Two members will decide whether they want you or not.
2. Most schools have 25-40 admission committee members from various backgrounds. They are not neccessarily faculty members at its institution. They will decide whether you are good enough for their schools based on your paper application and an interview report from your interviewer.
3. Finally, admission office decideds the final cut. When they decide the final decisions, they look at diversity of classes, etc.

The last step is kinda tricky. He told me that each school has brackets for different levels of applicants. For example, they decide to draw 25% of their applicants from SAT score range of 1540-1600. Then, 25% from 1400-1530, etc. Each school has its own brackets. Let's suppose you have 1590 on your SAT. If the school has already filled their 25% 1540-1600 bracket, you won't get in because your bracket is already filled not because you are not a qualified applicant. Schools wants to have a diversified class. That's why they are doing it. For example, for Harvard college, usually around 20,000 or a little more students apply, and a quarter of their applicants have 1600 on their SAT. The Harvad college class size is around 1100. If Harvard college accepts applicants based on their GPAs and SATs, their SAT score average should be 1600. Because 5000 out of 20,000 have 1600 on their SATs and their class size is only 1100. However, when you look at USNEWS, SAT average for Harvard college is 1490. In some sense, it's UNFAIR for highly qualified applicants. On the other hand, schools want to have a diversified class. When I am talking about numbers, I am ignoring applicants having connections and extraordinary extracurricular activities.

I'm not bragging, but when I was applying for colleges, I had 1530 SATs, and 3.99 GPA, a number of APs with 5, Student Government, Varsity sports, etc. However, I didn't get accepted at top 10 schools. Back then, my uncle wasn't on the committee ( 😡 ). However, he told me that if I had gotten 1470-1490, I might had a better chance. He said, 1530 is high, but not good enough for a upper bracket. If I had gotten a little below 1500, I would have been placed in a mid-bracket, which I would have a better chance. It's PAST. WHO CARES~~@@!!!

So, I assume that UPenn has already filled their high-upper bracket with 23+ applicants. That's my guess. What do you think guys? 😱
This bracket business seems to be really unfair and actually seems to punish people for being smart. 😕 😕 👎 👎
 
cowsgomoo said:
This bracket business seems to be really unfair and actually seems to punish people for being smart. 😕 😕 👎 👎


I know we folk up here in Canada eh are a little slow eh, but schools here just pick the best students. Seems kind of stupid don't it 👎
 
swanlake said:
Hey, Jaerob
I don't know whether this is going to help you or not. I just hope that it helps you to understand admission processes. I have a uncle who is in an admission committee member in one of Ivy League schools. He explained admission processes at his institution. However, it's for college, not for dental school.

1. Schools randomly distribute your application to two committee members. Two members will decide whether they want you or not.
2. Most schools have 25-40 admission committee members from various backgrounds. They are not neccessarily faculty members at its institution. They will decide whether you are good enough for their schools based on your paper application and an interview report from your interviewer.
3. Finally, admission office decideds the final cut. When they decide the final decisions, they look at diversity of classes, etc.

The last step is kinda tricky. He told me that each school has brackets for different levels of applicants. For example, they decide to draw 25% of their applicants from SAT score range of 1540-1600. Then, 25% from 1400-1530, etc. Each school has its own brackets. Let's suppose you have 1590 on your SAT. If the school has already filled their 25% 1540-1600 bracket, you won't get in because your bracket is already filled not because you are not a qualified applicant. Schools wants to have a diversified class. That's why they are doing it. For example, for Harvard college, usually around 20,000 or a little more students apply, and a quarter of their applicants have 1600 on their SAT. The Harvad college class size is around 1100. If Harvard college accepts applicants based on their GPAs and SATs, their SAT score average should be 1600. Because 5000 out of 20,000 have 1600 on their SATs and their class size is only 1100. However, when you look at USNEWS, SAT average for Harvard college is 1490. In some sense, it's UNFAIR for highly qualified applicants. On the other hand, schools want to have a diversified class. When I am talking about numbers, I am ignoring applicants having connections and extraordinary extracurricular activities.

I'm not bragging, but when I was applying for colleges, I had 1530 SATs, and 3.99 GPA, a number of APs with 5, Student Government, Varsity sports, etc. However, I didn't get accepted at top 10 schools. Back then, my uncle wasn't on the committee ( 😡 ). However, he told me that if I had gotten 1470-1490, I might had a better chance. He said, 1530 is high, but not good enough for a upper bracket. If I had gotten a little below 1500, I would have been placed in a mid-bracket, which I would have a better chance. It's PAST. WHO CARES~~@@!!!

So, I assume that UPenn has already filled their high-upper bracket with 23+ applicants. That's my guess. What do you think guys? 😱


Swanlake-

Thanks for your input; it seems like you put a lot of time into responding, and I do appreciate that a lot. You definitely put a new perspective on things, and I'll take it b/c it's better than any of the other things I've heard and it actually does make some sense. However, I do agree with you and Cowsgomoo that it is quite unfair in many respects. To be totally honest, I don't really understand the value of diversity from a strictly academic standpoint (i.e. grades, aptitude tests, etc...I'M NOT talking about racial/ethnic/gender). Whatever. Like you mentioned, it's over and life goes on 🙂

Thanks again for taking time out to respond.

I'm still sticking with my previous conclusion: Screw UPenn 😀
 
Been rejected by FOUR schools pre-interview...AAHHHH!...let me add that i also haven't recieved even one interview invite.
rejected from:
arizona
UCSF
loma linda
case

oh FYI...a good friend of mine got accepted to UPENN last year (so class of 2009) with 3.3 GPA and 19/18.
 
I heart UPENN, no more bashing!
 
Rejected from Temple, Arizona, Loma Linda, Case Western, Indiana.
 
savvysearch said:
Rejected from Temple, Arizona, Loma Linda, Case Western, Indiana.

Which of those schools did you interview at, or, did you get rejected previous to any interview?
 
dexadental said:
I heart UPENN, no more bashing!

Hahahaha, perhaps I might, too, if circumstances were otherwise 😉 But since they aren't, I hate them with a passion 😀

Best of luck to you, Dexa. 🙂
 
rejected from penn
 
premedman said:
Which of those schools did you interview at, or, did you get rejected previous to any interview?

previous
 
freshly rejected by upenn...probably the worst feeling in the world.
 
rejected by Kentucky and UMKC 🙁
 
Rejected by Penn and Arizona...I couldn't really give flying f.... though.
 
Rejected today by U of Minn. Ouch!
Good luck everyone!
 
Please see signature.
 
Top