IcePenguin
Full Member
- Joined
- Dec 26, 2019
- Messages
- 17
- Reaction score
- 1
Deleted
Last edited:
Hey everyone, I have been accepted to the Harvard Undergraduate Research Conference as a poster presenter, but I'm not sure whether I should go, because I would have to pay some of the funds myself. My question is: are poster conferences beneficial, or are publications the only things that matter to medical schools? Should I go to a conference that's closer to me if my funds don't work out?
Thank you for your help!
On the other hand, you are going to be spending a ton of your own funds between today and the day you attend med school orientation, so I wouldn't let the fact that you are not receiving an all expenses paid trip to Cambridge stop you from doing something interesting that might be even a little beneficial to you. If having "to pay some of the funds myself" is going to be your limiting factor, you're going to have a very difficult time applying to med school! 🙂Posters still matter to medical schools as a signal of your interest in scientific inquiry rather than pure scientific accomplishment. That said, as is mentioned above, this is the equivalent of presenting at your school’s research days. If you have zero other research dissemination (pubs or presentations) this could be helpful, but if you have anything else this likely isn’t going to add much to your application (at least if I was reviewing).
Publications don't even really matter all that much to most med schools. They are not ranked very highly on the surveys given to adcoms except for the top research powerhouses, and even then you don't necessarily need pubs--just research experience. IMO, if you have to pay a lot of money to get to a poster conference that won't give you more benefit than presenting at your own institution, it's not worth it. If you're going to pay, it might as well be to a national conference.
Someone told me that presenting at Harvard equates to presenting at a national level, but I'm not very experienced with conferences, so do you mind telling me what you think of that statement?
Someone told me that presenting at Harvard equates to presenting at a national level, but I'm not very experienced with conferences, so do you mind telling me what you think of that statement?
100% false.
Sometimes docs without a lot of research experience can’t differentiate good vs weak conferences, but even people without a ton of research experience will know this is an undergraduate research conference and not a national level scientific meeting.
That’s why I stand by my original statement: if you have no other research dissemination then this conference may be a useful signal to adcoms of your interest in research but is not in and of itself going to be viewed as a significant scientific accomplishment. If you have disseminated elsewhere (other pubs or presentations) I’d skip it.
National/international conferences are more important
Should I go to the NCUR instead then? I already have 4 posters, but they're all at my undergrad. So I'd like to pick 1 more to go to.
How much money are we talking about? Do you have the capital or credit line that would allow you to pay off the costs reasonably quickly without significant pain? I'd personally be inclined to go. More is better IMHO whenever we are talking about publications or poster presentations. I'd rather be out of a couple hundred bucks than wonder if I didn't get in XYZ School of Medicine later if that small investment would have tipped the scale in my favor.
P.S. Can you present at both conferences?
Should I go to the NCUR instead then? I already have 4 posters, but they're all at my undergrad. So I'd like to pick 1 more to go to.
That's really up to you. Feel free to go if you're interested
If all else is equal, go to whichever one with cheaper registration and/or more convenient. Don't crash into the rocks from the Harvard siren. It doesn't mean much as you've been likely told.I'm quite stuck between the two options![]()