- Joined
- Nov 30, 2015
- Messages
- 341
- Reaction score
- 433
*Hey everyone, this is my first thread/post on this website, and I just want to say thanks for the awesome website. This website has been helpful in regards to the medical school application process and so forth.*
I am debating on whether or not I should use my Pre Med committee when submitting my Letters of Recommendations. From what I have heard, the easy answer is almost always yes if I have the option to do so. On the other hand, I have heard of many individuals who have chose to forgo this route with no issues.
I am a senior who is currently attending a relatively large and average ranked state university (which has no relation to my username and avatar), and to be honest I was unaware that we had a pre medical committee at all. Here is what is asked of my committee....
3 LOR from science faculty members (Biology, Chemistry, Physics)
2 LOR from non science faculty/physicians/extracurricular references/etc.
Minimum of 3.2 GPA (I have a 3.9+)
A Personal Statement
MCAT Score (not yet taken)
(essentially my application)
There is no committee interview that I know of, and I am fairly sure that I will never have to actually meet a committee member. I currently feel comfortable with a LOR from 2 Science Professors, 1 non Science Professor, a Physician, and an extra curricular reference.
My first issue is that I do not have a solid third option in terms of a science faculty LOR. If need be, I can essentially scrape my way into an average LOR from a teacher I have probably spoken to maybe twice in my life, but I do not know if that is really worthwhile.
My second issue is that I do not know much about the committee or how trustworthy the committee is. The committee says it will finish the committee letter midway through July at the earliest, assuming they are true to their word and nothing goes wrong on my part.
The real question is... Should I suck up my way into an average LOR, as well as put my faith into my committee in regards to completing the letter in time and delivering a strong letter, or should I choose to forgo the committee and submit individual Letters of Recommendations?
I am debating on whether or not I should use my Pre Med committee when submitting my Letters of Recommendations. From what I have heard, the easy answer is almost always yes if I have the option to do so. On the other hand, I have heard of many individuals who have chose to forgo this route with no issues.
I am a senior who is currently attending a relatively large and average ranked state university (which has no relation to my username and avatar), and to be honest I was unaware that we had a pre medical committee at all. Here is what is asked of my committee....
3 LOR from science faculty members (Biology, Chemistry, Physics)
2 LOR from non science faculty/physicians/extracurricular references/etc.
Minimum of 3.2 GPA (I have a 3.9+)
A Personal Statement
MCAT Score (not yet taken)
(essentially my application)
There is no committee interview that I know of, and I am fairly sure that I will never have to actually meet a committee member. I currently feel comfortable with a LOR from 2 Science Professors, 1 non Science Professor, a Physician, and an extra curricular reference.
My first issue is that I do not have a solid third option in terms of a science faculty LOR. If need be, I can essentially scrape my way into an average LOR from a teacher I have probably spoken to maybe twice in my life, but I do not know if that is really worthwhile.
My second issue is that I do not know much about the committee or how trustworthy the committee is. The committee says it will finish the committee letter midway through July at the earliest, assuming they are true to their word and nothing goes wrong on my part.
The real question is... Should I suck up my way into an average LOR, as well as put my faith into my committee in regards to completing the letter in time and delivering a strong letter, or should I choose to forgo the committee and submit individual Letters of Recommendations?