I believe that when schools are given ample time to improve but fail to do so, it becomes a significant concern, and there should be consequences. Losing accreditation from CAAM-HP could serve as a wake-up call for Spartan to improve, especially if they are pursuing accreditation from ACCM instead. However, the increasing number of schools that have either withdrawn from CAAM-HP or added ACCM accreditation raises concerns about CAAM-HP.
For instance, I find it puzzling that schools like AUA, which may be one of CAAM-HP's biggest "clients," have been re-accredited without any stipulations despite having high attrition rates and many damning stories that have been posted. This, for example, suggests that attrition rates, which are a significant issue, may not be adequately addressed. Such inconsistencies raise red flags, especially considering that CAAM-HP charges fees based on the number of students enrolled, which could potentially incentivize them to favor schools with larger populations.
Who knows. I don't know much about Spartan, but I wish them well as they pursue ACCM.