... for many programs, school prestige is already given considerable weight in deciding who to interview and rank. Per the
2018 NRMP PD Survey , 50% of programs (among all specialties) cited 'being a graduate of a highly-regarded US medical school' as a factor in deciding who to interview, with a mean importance score (MIS) of 3.8.
Select comparisons:
Step I: 94% programs, MIS of 4.1
MSPE / letters from same specialty: ~80-85%, MIS of 4.0-4.2
Clerkship grades: 76%, MIS of 4.1
AOA membership: 60%, MIS of 3.9
Research: 41%, MIS of 3.7
Similar findings and trends are seen when considering who to rank highly, and also across competitive specialties. I suspect that the most competitive programs within each specialty (typically big name university academic programs) are the ones citing research and medical school reputation as being factors, with mean importance scores being quite comparable to Step I, LORs, clerkship grades, AOA, etc. This isn't to imply that medical school rank/reputation is the most important factor considered (nb: it's definitely not), but school reputation is a consideration for many program directors per this survey ... For me, this would explain why "top" schools tend to have more impressive match lists, and why residents at the most competitive programs by and large disproportionately come from their peer institutions (with some notable exceptions against this trend). Access to better-known faculty and other opportunities would not fully explain these observations.
If for whatever reason a student deems it important to end up in one of these programs, then considering medical school reputation (as one of many considerations, including debt, fit, proximity to family, etc) would not be an unreasonable one. Just my thoughts.