- Joined
- May 17, 2017
- Messages
- 136
- Reaction score
- 90
Recent Announcements | USMLE
www.usmle.org
Can anyone explain the impact this will have? Just a lowly M1 so I still doing have a lot of knowledge on STEP lol
Zero impact. The only impact will be to your bank account.Can anyone explain the impact this will have? Just a lowly M1 so I still doing have a lot of knowledge on STEP lol
Can anyone explain the impact this will have? Just a lowly M1 so I still doing have a lot of knowledge on STEP lol
The impact is you’ll save like a thousand dollars and your time.
About $1590 and closer to $1700 with tax in some places... this is long overdue
Not gonna lie, that gave me a very much needed laugh hahaI love how the OP's name is "foreverworthless," a fitting tag for 2CS.
If the alphabet soup is logical, they will announce any addition of items with at least a two year lead-time... that is IF they are logicalAny chance they come up with something equally as terrible in the next 2 years? Asking for a friend...asking for myself.
True. They did the same for Step 1. Hopefully we’re in the clear.If the alphabet soup is logical, they will announce any addition of items with at least a two year lead-time... that is IF they are logical
WasCS is prob a huge money maker for the USMLE, I assumed they'd just wait it out.
Med school is filled with Type A, anal, "must succeed at any cost" individuals that also come from big money. One of the easiest groups to milk and people are really good at doing so ala GoldUSMLEReview haha.People use prep companies for CS?
Someone has to be wrong sometimes.I thought CS was a good exam in general. Let me be the pariah here. "And we have free speech in this country."
I agree with that last part, and my opinion is that you're wrong.I think maintaining some form of practical / in-person exam is fair for medical licensing purposes. The exam sequence is becoming weaker than it used to be. People have opinions. Yes. That's how forums work. How about that.
I think maintaining some form of practical / in-person exam is fair for medical licensing purposes. The exam sequence is becoming weaker than it used to be. People have opinions. Yes. That's how forums work. How about that.
I think maintaining some form of practical / in-person exam is fair for medical licensing purposes. The exam sequence is becoming weaker than it used to be. People have opinions. Yes. That's how forums work. How about that.
Except all US med schools already have this. I like the idea in DO forums of decentralizing CS/PE by having schools certifying results of passing the OSCEs.
Make CS/PE the screening tool for IMGs/FMGs only. Leave US grads out of this crap
I thought the exact same thingThere’s no way they will just let 1500 (or however much it costs now) x 20,000 slide
it’s only a matter of time before they come up something else
Ah, the old "back in my day" argument. Always logical and strong.
I just think a numerical Step 1 + the presence of 2CS adds more value to the examination sequence overall compared to what it's becoming.
I think he is an IMG actually.For who? IMGs/FMGs? It's useless for US med students
Ha you are the guy who wrote the silly stuff in that old clerkships guide. This is perfectly on-brand. Incredible really.I thought CS was a good exam in general. Let me be the pariah here. "And we have free speech in this country."