Hi all,
Very fortunate to get acceptance to these two state schools.
Without considering costs, is there is a perceived difference in the quality of these two (in terms of match competitiveness, general feelings towards, etc.)
Here are some quicks pros/cons I jotted down.. Let me know if I missed something!
Stony Brook
Pros
Cons
Pros
Thanks!
Very fortunate to get acceptance to these two state schools.
Without considering costs, is there is a perceived difference in the quality of these two (in terms of match competitiveness, general feelings towards, etc.)
Here are some quicks pros/cons I jotted down.. Let me know if I missed something!
Stony Brook
Pros
- Smaller class size (136 v 162)
- More "options" (e.g. More dual degrees, possibility to do 3 year MD)
- Potentially better matching beyond Massachusetts?
- Some new, shiny buildings (i.e. MART)
- Big improvement in STEP 1 (~6pts) after switching up the curriculum
Cons
- Worse rep than UMass? (If so, how come? Less known?)
- Competition with undergrads for on-campus research?
Pros
- Learning communities and great outdoor activities (apparently 99th percentile for student happiness)
- Better USNews and residency director rankings (not sure how good a measure this is?)
- Really good looking campus (subjective, I know)
- Worse location? (Students have expressed discontent with Worcester)
- Possibility of being pigeon-holed into primary care? (I would like to maximize options)
Thanks!
Last edited: