The craiglist killer is a med student!

This forum made possible through the generous support of SDN members, donors, and sponsors. Thank you.
I don't know how to tell you this but don't you guys have better things to do than monitoring random postings on a public forums?

The administrators at BU have been following this and other threads on SDN and are, frankly, appalled by the callousness of many of the posts. They said so at a school town meeting. And I am sure other administrators from other schools are reading these too, as is the media.

Oh really? If this is a case, why didn't they pay any attention to the guy before he went homicidal? As some of the other posters have noted, Markoff was gambling night after night, and was gone for extended stretches of time. If this was the case, he could have been failing classes and teetering on the edge of a mental breakdown. Would that have raised any red flags? Also, as with the previous guy (the ex-Israeli commando), why did they let in a guy who was a trained assassin and had threatened to kill his ex-girlfriend? How come they didn't pick that up on their background check?

Also, I'm puzzled as to why BU would be interested in what we are saying instead of what is happening inside their medical school. I believe that this is an internal matter and it's up to them how they handle it. Regardless of what happens, there are going to be negative publicity directed towards the school, they shouldn't be suprised by it. But why don't they find a better use of their time and try to get counseling and support to their students instead of wasting time on SDN and discussing how callous we are. I think they need to get their priority in order first and focus on their students rather than on what we or the media are thinking.

What's wrong with gambling night after night? What's wrong with being gone for long stretches? And you can't just assume that he was doing poorly in his classes. Is it really the school's place to concern themselves with what their students are doing outside of class (as long as it isn't illegal of course).

Members don't see this ad.
 
. Personally, I think it would be cool if we had trained SEALs, Israeli commandos, Delta Force, and ninjas hanging around medical school. But of course, we should screen them to make sure that they're not psychotic.

It's not too uncommon. My class has a Green Beret, an Army infantry captain, an Navy submarine XO, a fighter pilot, and a good number of guys from the Academies. I haven't seen any ninjas, but obviously that doesn't mean much .
 
Last edited:
It's not too uncommon. My class has a Green Beret, an Army infantry captain, an Navy submarine XO, a fighter pilot, and a good number of guys from the Academies. I haven't seen any ninjas, but obviously that doesn't mean much .

Sheesh, before I was only worried about getting good enough grades to get a good match. Now your telling me I have to be a Ninja too?

Screw this.
 
Members don't see this ad :)
The administrators at BU have been following this and other threads on SDN and are, frankly, appalled by the callousness of many of the posts. They said so at a school town meeting. And I am sure other administrators from other schools are reading these too, as is the media.

Right, because the opinions of SDN members influences public opinion how?

The story was on this week's cover of People magazine with the title in bold: "Med Student Murderer".

I'm glad BU is doing something about the matter but I hope monitoring SDN comments is not high on its priority list. Otherwise that would be downright shameful.
 
What's wrong with gambling night after night? What's wrong with being gone for long stretches? And you can't just assume that he was doing poorly in his classes. Is it really the school's place to concern themselves with what their students are doing outside of class (as long as it isn't illegal of course).

It appears he was gambling as a means to gain income not out of leisure or recreation and he had enough of a problem to amass a huge debt. Gambling can be the result of underlying psychological issues: problems with impulse control, depression, etc. Meanwhile as he was digging himself into a deeper and deeper hole he allegedly robbed women (and men) off Craigslist to pay off his gambling debt. While theoretically there is no problem gambling night after night, in this case, it may shed light into the possible motive behind his crimes.

To add further irony he was arrested en route to the Foxwoods Casino in CT.
 
Right, because the opinions of SDN members influences public opinion how?

The story was on this week's cover of People magazine with the title in bold: "Med Student Murderer".

I'm glad BU is doing something about the matter but I hope monitoring SDN comments is not high on its priority list. Otherwise that would be downright shameful.


Well said. BU has a higher priority than randomly monitoring anonymous student chatter on a web forum. The fact that they've let in 2 violent killers over the past 7 years and missed all the red warning flags definitey does not reflect well on their admissions policy. Before they look and criticize others, look and critize themselves first.
 
Well said. BU has a higher priority than randomly monitoring anonymous student chatter on a web forum. The fact that they've let in 2 violent killers over the past 7 years and missed all the red warning flags definitey does not reflect well on their admissions policy. Before they look and criticize others, look and critize themselves first.

actually, it's the THIRD time...once in 1993, 2001, and now..2009...

a 8 year interval...2017...WATCH OUT
 
Well said. BU has a higher priority than randomly monitoring anonymous student chatter on a web forum. The fact that they've let in 2 violent killers over the past 7 years and missed all the red warning flags definitey does not reflect well on their admissions policy. Before they look and criticize others, look and critize themselves first.

First time poster here. It probably doesn't help to respond to all the sophomoric comments about BU being posted in this thread, but I found this in the AAMC's website:

http://www.aamc.org/newsroom/reporter/sept06/backgroundchecks.htm

Quit critizing BU without all the facts. Dr. Witzburg went on the record in favor of establishing criminal background checks for medical students back in 2006. How is that a poor reflection of BU's admission policy? And who is BU supposedly criticizing? I haven't read any official releases criticizing anyone.
 
First time poster here. It probably doesn't help to respond to all the sophomoric comments about BU being posted in this thread, but I found this in the AAMC's website:

http://www.aamc.org/newsroom/reporter/sept06/backgroundchecks.htm

Quit critizing BU without all the facts. Dr. Witzburg went on the record in favor of establishing criminal background checks for medical students back in 2006. How is that a poor reflection of BU's admission policy? And who is BU supposedly criticizing? I haven't read any official releases criticizing anyone.

Maybe they were in favor of criminal background checks because they'd already admitted two murderers by that point...
 
...

Please act like the respected physicians you hope to be one day. Show some compassion. Your words are no less hurtful because you are anonymous. The anonymity just makes you cowards.

Law2D and drizzt and others, why don't you put your names on your inflammatory posts. No? Too ashamed? Then you shouldn't be saying these things.

People don't post on here with names -- it has little to do with cowardice -- that's simply the nature of the forum, and IMHO it allows for more expression of viewpoints. It is improper and a violation of TOS on this forum to try and "out" people. However I don't know that anything I've said is slanderous or inflammatory -- I really just posted that some schools ask more questions than others, and perhaps, just perhaps, that lets them know the applicants a bit better. Something I believe, and something that the school involved here (which I also said several times did nothing per se "wrong" but certainly could do things better) is likely exploring in internal discussions at this very minute. You learn from your mistakes, or you are doomed to repeat them. The first reaction of a wise organization shouldn't be to get upset by external discussions it should be to talk internally and see if there is anything that needs to be fixed. If that concept is "inflammatory" to you, then maybe you aren't ready to read boards like SDN.
 
Last edited:
But you are saying exactly that: more essays keep out murderers. It is absurd. Your "logical, legal" mind is failing you here.

I'm not actually saying that. What I am saying is that if you ask more questions, you learn more. It might not be what you need to learn to make you sour on an applicant, but you can't ever know if you don't ask. So is it coincidence that the school whose application requires the least effort netted this dude? (and another alleged killer before him) I don't know. Nobody does. But it surely should be food for thought for the school at issue. That's all I'm saying. You ask more questions or you accept the fact that you know less. It's true for every aspect of life, including admissions. And really was my only point on this thread. Not particularly inflammatory. Just honest.

As I said before I doubt that the school would ask a question to which this applicant would 'fess up. That never happens. But they may ask a question to which his response could rub them the wrong way. (People with homicidal derangement SOMETIMES don't process things exactly the same as the rest of us.) Or not. But they will never really know if there was something that would have tipped them off without the asking. That's the danger of not doing something -- there really is no defense to the statement that you could have done more.
 
Last edited:
First time poster here. It probably doesn't help to respond to all the sophomoric comments about BU being posted in this thread, but I found this in the AAMC's website:

http://www.aamc.org/newsroom/reporter/sept06/backgroundchecks.htm

Quit critizing BU without all the facts. Dr. Witzburg went on the record in favor of establishing criminal background checks for medical students back in 2006. How is that a poor reflection of BU's admission policy? And who is BU supposedly criticizing? I haven't read any official releases criticizing anyone.

Yes, he supported criminal background checks. But that still didn't prevent the guy who threatened to kill his ex-girlfriend from getting in (even though I'm sure he had a criminal record). So what's the point of background checks if they don't work? Wishful thinking on their part maybe?

You will note that BU hasn't officially criticized anyone, but if you scroll up and read the comment from one of the medical students there, you will note that BU administrators read the comments on SDN and brought it up in a public forum. The fact that BU administrators are even reading this forum and talking about it at a school town meeting doesn't reflect well on their priority. Their first priority should be with themselves and their students. They need to get their priorties straightened out and pay more attention to their students and their admissions policies.

I'm appalled that they would sit around all day surfing SDN when they have much bigger problems to deal with than wondering what a couple of premeds think on an anonymous public forum.
 
Members don't see this ad :)
The craiglist killer is a med student!

All that means is that yes, there is time to do things outside of class and studying. 😉
 
Up until about four years ago, there was no secondary at BUSM. You simply added the school to your AMCAS application and of course paid $95. The decisions then were based solely on the primary. They were very unique in doing this at that time.

One of the big problems with BUSM is the administration, including the admissions. There is a strong inferiority complex within BU, admitting students with higher numbers to boost there status is a top priority. BU also takes many URM students with extremely low numbers, people who really shouldn't even be in medical school. Due to this, non-URM students from the general application pool have to have greater numbers in order to bring the average up. I know other schools do this as well, but I don't believe it is to the extent that BU does. I've met med students at BU who I would never allow anywhere near patients.

I agree with Mao, the fact that they are so concerned with what is being said on SDN is a testament to the priorities at their school. I've read on other threads that the Dean of admissions reads this site and supposedly knows who some of the people are and that, if you ask him at the interview, he has a completely different story regarding what was posted. Do a search on BU, I doubt there is any other medical school which is as maligned on here.
 
Last edited:
One of the big problems with BUSM is the administration, including the admissions. There is a strong inferiority complex within BU, admitting students with higher numbers to boost there status is a top priority.

Only if they'd go to BU though, they hate being turned down for people who end up at other schools in the same city...
 
Up until about four years ago, there was no secondary at BUSM. You simply added the school to your AMCAS application and of course paid $95. The decisions then were based solely on the primary. They were very unique in doing this at that time.
...

This is their application set up I am familiar with. If they changed it by the time this dude applied (and I've been told in several threads that they haven't -- the secondary essay is still "optional"-- I'm deferring to that), then maybe some of the statements could be tempered.
 
This is their application set up I am familiar with. If they changed it by the time this dude applied (and I've been told in several threads that they haven't -- the secondary essay is still "optional"-- I'm deferring to that), then maybe some of the statements could be tempered.
You're right. Before there was absolutely no secondary, now there is one where you basically recapitulate info from your AMCAS application plus the optional essay.
 
Yes, he supported criminal background checks. But that still didn't prevent the guy who threatened to kill his ex-girlfriend from getting in (even though I'm sure he had a criminal record).

Maybe he didn't. He made threats against his ex-fiancee and her family when she broke off their engagement, which caused her to go into hiding. But she may not have pressed charges against him. Many people decline to press charges after the incident is over, in some cases because they don't want to confront the defendant in court.

A criminal background check will only reveal the fact that a person has been convicted of a crime, not their arrest record. I think this is necessary because our justice system is based on the presumption of innocence, but it also means that plenty of questionable people can pass CBCs.
 
This is their application set up I am familiar with. If they changed it by the time this dude applied (and I've been told in several threads that they haven't -- the secondary essay is still "optional"-- I'm deferring to that), then maybe some of the statements could be tempered.

you are stalking "several threads" on this? geez.
 
you will note that BU administrators read the comments on SDN and brought it up in a public forum. The fact that BU administrators are even reading this forum and talking about it at a school town meeting doesn't reflect well on their priority. Their first priority should be with themselves and their students. They need to get their priorties straightened out and pay more attention to their students and their admissions policies.

The point of the meeting was to be supportive to the students and give them a place to air their concerns, including all the rumors that had been circulating, many of them false. The fact that they mentioned SDN's nutty posts was hardly a "priority" of the meeting. It was said in the context of all the media distortions out there.

Talk about warped priorities: why don't you guys go study or spend time with friends?

the fact that
 
A criminal background check will only reveal the fact that a person has been convicted of a crime, not their arrest record. I think this is necessary because our justice system is based on the presumption of innocence, but it also means that plenty of questionable people can pass CBCs.

Exactly. For some perspective, check out some of these incidents involving students from other medical schools:

http://www.philly.com/philly/news/new_jersey/20090408_Med_student_fights_expulsion_over_attempted-murder_charge.html

http://media.www.mtsusidelines.com/media/storage/paper202/news/2001/03/21/WomensHist/Nyu-Grad.Student.Charged.In.Drugging.Assault.Of.Fellow.Student-56909.shtml

http://www.ca6.uscourts.gov/opinions.pdf/05a0349p-06.pdf

http://celebgalz.com/jeremy-noyes-charged-with-sex-crimes/

http://media.www.dailylobo.com/media/storage/paper344/news/2002/09/25/News/Student.Charged.With.Sex.Crime-281244.shtml

http://www.politedissent.com/archives/1312
 
any updates on this case? new articles link?

There is an interesting twist in the school is getting some flak for apparently hidding student run newspapers covering the incident, and then apparently not admitting to it. Supposedly there is a backroom somewhere filled with student free pass papers covering the story. Schools officials say they are available by request.

Reporters were removed from the medical school campus, and it seems fair to do that, especially for the students studying there, but removing the freepress students papers seems like it was only done to deflect attention away from the school as this doesn't seem to interfer with medical students studying.

This is a trajedy no doubt, especially for the victims and their families, and also for the medical students at BU who knew this student. But, I don't think the attempt by BU's med school to basically wash their hands and walk away from the incident serves anyone, except maybe some nervous people in admissions.

When the space shuttle blew up there was a massive investigation over years to figure out what went wrong. While Phil Markoff may have been hardwired to be a sociopath, and nothing the school could have or would have done might have averted this, before his time at BU he wasn't murdering people and participating in robberies. Although apparently he did try to force himself on a female friend which was brushed away by her at the time, but in retrospect and in reality is pretty serious.

It would be good if the BU medical school looked at how their medical students cope with the massive amounts of stress and pressure applied to them during medical school. While the information about how to decrease stress or "de-stress" won't bring back the young woman who's life was cut short it could help future classes at BU. I think to sweep it under the rug is inappropriate as is being concerned about what is said on a message board when worse things are doubtlessly being said in private.

By censoring the free press, coaching employees and student tour guides how to respond and refusing to talk to reporters (schools administrators, not students) this leaves a bad impression that BU is only concerned about their image and not assessing their medical school in terms of stress and support for students. This is sort of separate story from the whole Markoff incident. It would just seem wrong if the medical school didn't launch a study or investigation about how their medical students deal with stress, what issues are available to them, and to see if there are any areas where the school could improve. Certainly there have been past complaints about the treatment of medical students at the school, which perhaps isn't unique to BU, but perhaps should be looked more closely at.

Studying how to help med students cope at BU would help the students there, and would actually make the school look good in applicant's eyes. Certainly no one wants to have to answer questions about going to the same med school as Markoff, and it is a trajedy that current students will be asked this by countless people in the future during residency and beyond, hiding newspapers won't help with that unfortunately.

When the space shuttle blew up NASA didn't go around hiding newspapers chroniciling the disaster, they had the more mature approach to figure out if something could have been done different and were shocked that a piece of styrofoam going at accelerated speed ripped through metal like a knife through butter. Victims families appreciated the effort to learn something from the trajedy, and I am sure the young woman's family would at some point, maybe not now, but at some point appreciate it if the school tried to make sure that something like this never happens again. It is an important gesture to make. You gotta wonder about a guy who goes drinking/gambling pretty heavily during second year curriculum, who presumably spends a whole lot of time at the school like a lot of students. BU does employ a tough sink or swim type educational environment, which before the incident the administration was going to make it even harder to progress from year to year with problems on exams for good or bad. It would be very arrogant in a way for BU's medical school not to investigate "what went wrong" and assume that it was a fluke.

QUINCY —
Boston University is hiding copies of the student paper with headlines about accused medical student Philip Markoff's murder charges so prospective students and their parents won't get scared off, reports The Daily Free Press, the independent student newspaper.
The Daily Free Press writes:
When it comes to the case of Philip Markoff, better known nationally as the "Craigslist killer," a second year Boston University School of Medicine student arrested Monday on suspicion of murder, kidnapping and robbery charges, BU administration appears to have "no comment."

Though their phones have been ringing constantly for the past three days, school officials have been tight-lipped about anything to do with the case, from terse and few public statements, to efforts to keep copies of The Daily Free Press out of places where prospective students might see headlines about the alleged "Craigslist killer."

Dean of Students Kenneth Elmore has been quoted in only one news story (The Daily Free Press, "Students ‘shocked' by suspect's ID," April 22), and Medical Campus Provost and MED Dean Karen Antman has released one statement, dated April 20. It reads, in its entirety, as follows:

"Phillip H. Markoff [sic] is a second year medical student at Boston University School of Medicine. Upon learning of the charges against him, University officials immediately suspended him.

Any further inquiries on this case should be directed to the Boston Police Department."

The campus has found itself in the national spotlight in connection with the crime at peak college decision time for most high school seniors. According to the Admissions Office website, at least five prescheduled tours, led by President's Hosts for prospective students, meet at the Admissions Reception Center at 121 Bay State Road every day.

The Daily Free Press is delivered to the reception center daily, as well as to other on-campus locations. The paper can usually be found in the waiting area for prospective students and parents to peruse while they wait for their tours to begin. Tuesday and Wednesday's editions, however, were only available by specific request. The papers featured prominent headlines about the case ("Police arrest BU student as ‘Craigslist killer' suspect," April 21; "MED student pleads not guilty," April 22; "Students ‘shocked' by suspect's ID," April 22), and staff at the office said they did not want the potential freshmen to get a bad idea about the school or its students.

An admissions office employee, who wished to remain anonymous out of concern for her job, told a Daily Free Press reporter Wednesday that the papers had been hidden because of their content, which could reflect negatively on the school.


BU spokesman Colin Riley said he knew nothing about the newspapers being hidden.

"There's no reason that I know of that they wouldn't be there today or yesterday," he said. "I don't see any reason why they wouldn't be. Maybe they're all gone because people picked them up."

President's Hosts got an email from Senior Associate Director of Undergraduate Admissions John McEachern Tuesday with advice from Riley, telling them how to approach the issue if they were asked on tours.

"[Riley] urges [the admissions staff] not to be defensive," McEachern stated in the email. "He encourages us to embrace [questions about Markoff], and gave me some talking points."

Though College of Arts and Sciences sophomore and host Anthony Schultz has not led a tour since Markoff's arrest, he said he would "take the politically correct approach and say that we don't have that much information. Even his close friends and family had no idea."

Another host, College of Communication junior Hannah Ubl, has not given a tour since Monday either.

"[The email] just helped with knowing what the right thing would be to say," she said. Ubl said the hosts are encouraged to "be civil, real, authentic and say that we are sorry for the family," and that "no one can understand his behavior and it doesn't represent what a BU student is."

The party line used on tours seems to be playing well to prospective students.

"It's one student out of 15,000 to 16,000," Sherrie Deng, a Newton North High School junior, said. "That one person may be crazy, but that doesn't mean the school is bad."

MED students were also sent an email from Antman with tips on handling the media rushing to report on "the sad and disturbing news."

Antman wrote in the email that reporters would not shy away from using information found on the Internet and social networking sites such as Facebook for information on the alleged murderer.

"Please use caution and discretion in discussing this case on those sites as anything you post could become part of the media coverage," the email stated.

Elmore said he had no comment on how the alleged connection between a BU student and a murder trial could affect admissions at the university.

"You should talk to Dean Antman at the medical campus," he said.

However, calls to Antman's office were immediately redirected to the Corporate Communications Office for MED and its teaching hospital, Boston Medical Center.

"I can only tell you what's in the statement," BMC and MED spokeswoman Gina DiGravio said. "He was –– or is –– a second year student at the School of Medicine."

She said the medical campus has been "crawling with reporters" since Markoff's arrest, and public safety officers have been removing any media who leave the sidewalk to ask questions.

"They are trespassing," she said.

Riley defended the removal of reporters from the South End medical campus.

"The students and BU School of Medicine are in the process of getting an education and are studying, and it's the end of the semester," he said. "The last thing they need is a distraction, impediment or nuisance."
 
Last edited:
Censoring the student newspaper seems like locking the barn door after the horses are gone given that it was on every major news service on the internet etc. It just makes the school look bad for no reason.
 
Censoring the student newspaper seems like locking the barn door after the horses are gone given that it was on every major news service on the internet etc. It just makes the school look bad for no reason.
They're not too bright over there.
 
Censoring the student newspaper seems like locking the barn door after the horses are gone given that it was on every major news service on the internet etc. It just makes the school look bad for no reason.

Just as a clarification - the newspaper thing happened at the admissions office at the BU undergrad campus, not the med school. They are separate and in different parts of the city. There is no student newspaper at the med school.
 
Just as a clarification - the newspaper thing happened at the admissions office at the BU undergrad campus, not the med school. They are separate and in different parts of the city. There is no student newspaper at the med school.

Ah, well that's just weird then.
 
I'm not sure what the school could have done to "destress" Markoff so that he wouldn't do this. I think med school has nothing to do with his problem that he has.

As far as him fooling the admissions process, I think that it isn't that surprising. I don't think that more essays, or a secondary application, etc. is going to necessarily pick up these types of things. An intelligent person who is superficially charming can probably get past most interviews, essays or job interviews, etc. I don't really think it is fair to blame the school, although I have no dog in this fight. I think a private school like BU that is very expensive, is going to have to fight over good med student applicants because of competing with state schools, and with Harvard across town, etc. I think doing personal interviews and criminal background checks is about the most school can do to try to keep out the bad people. I heard that law schools don't even do personal interviews...is this true?
 
I heard that law schools don't even do personal interviews...is this true?
Yes, it's true. Law schools go simply by the application essays, GPA and LSAT. But, it's very different because the vast majority of them aren't going to be dealing with peoples lives.
 
Yes, it's true. Law schools go simply by the application essays, GPA and LSAT. But, it's very different because the vast majority of them aren't going to be dealing with peoples lives.

More than that, most law schools don't act as gateway to the profession the way that med schools do. With med schools a limited number get in and almost all will get licensed and residencies from there on out. With law schools a potentially unlimted number get in, but only 60-70% are going to end up licensed. As such, the bar does this role and in many states, does pretty significant character investigation and interviews at that stage. So the notion is that it's fine to let a murderer into law school because they will likely have a good chance to catch him when he applies for a license. As compared to med school where the higher barrier is at the school level. So it's different -- different gatekeeper roles.

It has less to do with dealing with people's lives, because most lawyers will deal with people's livelihoods, and you'd be surprised but more families will forgive the doctor for losing Uncle Harry than they will the lawyer who loses Uncle Harry's millions. 🙂
 
Last edited:
great post man..LAW2DOC is the most logical and informative person on SDN.
 
More than that, most law schools don't act as gateway to the profession the way that med schools do. With med schools a limited number get in and almost all will get licensed and residencies from there on out. With law schools a potentially unlimted number get in, but only 60-70% are going to end up licensed. As such, the bar does this role and in many states, does pretty significant character investigation and interviews at that stage. So the notion is that it's fine to let a murderer into law school because they will likely have a good chance to catch him when he applies for a license. As compared to med school where the higher barrier is at the school level. So it's different -- different gatekeeper roles.

It has less to do with dealing with people's lives, because most lawyers will deal with people's livelihoods, and you'd be surprised but more families will forgive the doctor for losing Uncle Harry than they will the lawyer who loses Uncle Harry's millions. 🙂
Yeah, you're right. That was a quickie post. Also, I've never known anyone who didn't get in to law school somewhere. No matter how low their LSAT's or GPA's were. That's why for law school and business school it actually does matter where you graduate. I've heard it's not even worth getting an MBA unless it's a top 20 school (unless you're doing it more for yourself).
 
And today he committed suicide in jail.

http://www.nydailynews.com/news/nat...philip_markoff_found_dead_in_jail_police.html

The Boston medical student who preyed on Craigslist escorts and murdered a Manhattan model last year killed himself in prison Sunday - the day after what would have been his first wedding anniversary.

Philip Markoff, 24, was found dead in his Nashua St. Jail cell in Boston, where he was awaiting his March murder trial.

A prison guard told the Daily News that he didn't know how Markoff had done himself in, but that his training in anatomy might help him beat anti-suicide measures.

"He's one step beyond other inmates and can do things other inmates can't, because he knows about the human body," the guard told the News.

Markoff was arrested in April 2009 for the murder of Julissa Brisman, 26, a model and aspiring actress from the Upper West Side.

Brisman, who moonlighted as an erotic masseuse, was shot dead when she fought Markoff's attempts to tie her up and rob her in the plush Marriott Copley Place hotel in downtown Boston.

Police said Markoff had answered her ad on Craiglist.

When Markoff, a native of upstate New York, was arrested, he was about to start medical school and marry Megan McAllister, his college sweetheart at the University of Albany.

They had a ritzy Jersey Shore wedding planned for Aug. 14, 2009.

McAllister initially defended her fiance, telling the media he "couldn't hurt a fly" and was "a beautiful person inside and out."

Within weeks, as evidence emerged that Markoff had panties and restraints hidden in his boxspring and a handgun hidden in a hollowed-out copy of the medical textbook "Gray's Anatomy" under the bed, she changed her mind and canceled the waterfront wedding in Long Branch, N.J.

Markoff had been on a brief suicide watch just after his arrest last spring when he reportedly tried to hang himself with his shoe laces and slice his wrists with a sharpened spoon.

The prison guard told the News that Markoff had no friends in prison and kept to himself in his cellblock, which was restricted to murderers.

"He secluded himself. He (did) a lot of reading. The other guys are not like him. He's educated; most of these guys come from the street," the guard said.

Police said the former Boston University medical student robbed escorts on the theory that they would not call the cops. Brisman fought back, so he killed her, cops said.

Markoff was charged with the armed robbery of another escort in another fancy Boston hotel, and a third assault of an escort at a Rhode Island motel.

Police said he might have had other victims who were too afraid to come forward, some of them men or transsexuals.

Police nabbed Markoff after trailing him through cyberspace: tracking his emails, pinpointing the location of his phone calls and watching security camera footage.

Sadly, Markoff appears to have spawned some copycats.

A Massachusetts man was arrested just last week for arranging to meet an escort through Craigslist and robbing her.

Read more: http://www.nydailynews.com/news/nat..._found_dead_in_jail_police.html#ixzz0wi2mzYyT
 
"A prison guard told the Daily News that he didn't know how Markoff had done himself in, but that his training in anatomy might help him beat anti-suicide measures."

That's the strangest thing I've ever heard, especially in light of the fact that his first plan had been to slit his wrists- arguably the least efficient, least anatomically reasonable way to actually kill yourself. I love how the prison guard is trying to cover his own gluteus maximus by saying it must have been some kind of med student voodoo.


Otherwise, this whole story is very sad.
 
Probably hired a professional assassin off Craigslist to stage it as a "suicide". Love the username btw.

I miss that show!

"A prison guard told the Daily News that he didn't know how Markoff had done himself in, but that his training in anatomy might help him beat anti-suicide measures."

That's the strangest thing I've ever heard, especially in light of the fact that his first plan had been to slit his wrists- arguably the least efficient, least anatomically reasonable way to actually kill yourself. I love how the prison guard is trying to cover his own gluteus maximus by saying it must have been some kind of med student voodoo.


Otherwise, this whole story is very sad.

I don't understand, shouldn't it be obvious where he cut himself? Hopefully they'll do an autopsy.
 
i've been trying to think of something witty to lighten the mood a little in this thread but damn, what a waste of talent.

He had so much going for him.
 
Top