- Joined
- Jun 12, 2014
- Messages
- 25
- Reaction score
- 2
Registration opens up sometime today so I thought I'd go ahead and make this thread. Anyone else taking it in August?
No, you should be fine - just make sure you submit your secondaries ASAP. I am taking it on August 22nd and applying this round.
Have people been looking at published articles? People who've taken the exam are advising that we do that...any ideas about the best way to go about doing this? Looking up random studies on pubmed doesn't seem ideal.
Okay I'm for real panicking. I took a TPR Demo section of the test for Bio/biochem and got a 123, and this was after heavy content review for a month. This was my first time dealing with passages though. I was just reading Kaplan before that. But a 123 is extremely discouraging knowing that that's what people get pre-content review. I haven't even started studying physics/chem. Should I postpone?![]()
Yep, they're easier than companies' prep material. However, I have a feeling the real thing will be harder than the most of the question packs' material.Are you guys doing the question packs? Is anyone finding the questions strangely....easy?
hahaha im super pumped@federer875 So I wonder who you're rooting for tomorrow?![]()
I'm starting to get nervous that I'm focusing way too much time on TPR that I haven't even touched the AAMC test yet. I had 2 more TPR FLs scheduled and then AAMC FL 2 weeks before and the half-length AAMC exam a week before. Also people here and there on SDN are saying TPR wasn't that much harder than the June MCAT. Really odd because I know some individuals in real life who took the June MCAT and took multiple TPR exams and said it felt easier.
I'm scheduled to take it on Aug 6. Just briefly looked at some Aug 21/Aug 22 locations for the test in my home state and boy, all the locations remaining are definitely an inconvenience for the most part.
Absolutely. They wrote the old exams and they're writing this one as well.Do you guys think it's worth reviewing the old AAMCs?
Absolutely. They wrote the old exams and they're writing this one as well.
Much better this time man. I think I'm getting it figured out. I've been off SDN for the most part this summer. Because people posting things make you worry and there's no room for emotions in this exam. Just gotta do the workAlright thanks. How's your prep going by the way? I still remember you from last summer.
Much better this time man. I think I'm getting it figured out. I've been off SDN for the most part this summer. Because people posting things make you worry and there's no room for emotions in this exam. Just gotta do the work
Is your prep going alright?
Same sameYeah man, I feel I know more material this summer too. Taking a gap year too?
When is everyone planning to take the AAMC official full length?
I am taking the AAMC two weeks before the exam as well. I took the Official Guide today and got 25/30 C/P, 29/30 CARS, 17/30 Bio, and 29/30 Psych/soc, so apparently this week is Bio week!!! I am on the docket for the August 6th Exam date. Keep pushing y'all, its time to make the last push to the finish line.
July 27 is the day, so about 1.5 weeks before the examWhen is everyone planning to take the AAMC official full length?
I'm taking it on July 29, exactly a week before the big day.When is everyone planning to take the AAMC official full length?
I felt like the Psych/Soc was much easier than Kaplan's and the Cars was maybe a bit easier or on par. Chem/Phys was about the same as Kaplan. Bio/Biochem seemed harder (obviously) because the passages were very dense with experiments. Kaplan tends to ask similar questions but you aren't ciphering through as much technical language and real-life data representations as in the Official Guide. And they tell me the Official Guide is easy, so I need to get to work!
I'm probably gonna take AAMC next week which would be a month before my test. Figure that if there are any glaring deficiencies I'd do best to address them. I'm hoping to get in 11 tests before the real one-- 3 TPR, 3 TBR, 4 EK and 1 AAMC.
I felt like the Psych/Soc was much easier than Kaplan's and the Cars was maybe a bit easier or on par. Chem/Phys was about the same as Kaplan. Bio/Biochem seemed harder (obviously) because the passages were very dense with experiments. Kaplan tends to ask similar questions but you aren't ciphering through as much technical language and real-life data representations as in the Official Guide. And they tell me the Official Guide is easy, so I need to get to work!
Just took the official guide as well:
C/P: 24/30=80%
CARS: 22/30=73.30%
Bio: 22/30=73.30%
P/S: 26/30=86.70%
overall: 78.30%
Honestly, that BIO was tough... are you sure the official guide is supposed to be easier? Aside from that, C/P was pretty straightforward I say on par with both Kaplan and TPR but a lot less calculations. Psych/Soc...pretty on par with TPR and definitely easier than Kaplan. CARS?...I hate CARS...but I'd agree with it being on par with Kaplan...a little longer passages for some though. If I had to guess (basing off theoretical scales) I got something like a 127-128/126/126/129=508-509ish, which is weirdly on point with my current TPR average around 508-510, so there's that. Again, I can't really say that TPR and Kaplan are representative at all, and the AAMC material just has a completely different feel to it. I think this is good news for anyone that is stressing about memorizing all those random details in your books because you really don't need a lot of that random minutiae. A lot of the answers had more to do with intense understanding of experimental interpretation and using a balance of fundamental more "big-picture" concepts and filling in the holes that are given in the passage. A few of my friends said that the official guide questions felt a lot harder than what they got in June, and that the real thing felt a lot more like taking a TPR exam, so who knows. Might definitely check into Khan passages after seeing what I saw today though.
what exactly is the official guide? does it differ from the question packs?
Yeah, I heard that about the June 19th test.
Yea, I highly recommend doing them. It's 120 questions total...30 questions each section. I basically just did it as a half length: 48min per section.
Yea, I highly recommend doing them. It's 120 questions total...30 questions each section. I basically just did it as a half length: 48min per section.
So you are trying to do 11 FLs within a 28-30 day time frame? That's a little too much in my opinion.
I was confused about what the official guide was as well. So does it allow you to time it and take if as a half length or is that just something you did yourself? i.e. is it meant to be a half length or just practice (like the question packs) but you treated it as a half length?
Sorry if that sounded confusing
Are these the ones you can get for $10 on this page?Yea, I highly recommend doing them
Are these the ones you can get for $10 on this page?
Just took the official guide as well:
C/P: 24/30=80%
CARS: 22/30=73.30%
Bio: 22/30=73.30%
P/S: 26/30=86.70%
overall: 78.30%
Honestly, that BIO was tough... are you sure the official guide is supposed to be easier? Aside from that, C/P was pretty straightforward I say on par with both Kaplan and TPR but a lot less calculations. Psych/Soc...pretty on par with TPR and definitely easier than Kaplan. CARS?...I hate CARS...but I'd agree with it being on par with Kaplan...a little longer passages for some though. If I had to guess (basing off theoretical scales) I got something like a 127-128/126/126/129=508-509ish, which is weirdly on point with my current TPR average around 508-510, so there's that. Again, I can't really say that TPR and Kaplan are representative at all, and the AAMC material just has a completely different feel to it. I think this is good news for anyone that is stressing about memorizing all those random details in your books because you really don't need a lot of that random minutiae. A lot of the answers had more to do with intense understanding of experimental interpretation and using a balance of fundamental more "big-picture" concepts and filling in the holes that are given in the passage. A few of my friends said that the official guide questions felt a lot harder than what they got in June, and that the real thing felt a lot more like taking a TPR exam, so who knows. Might definitely check into Khan passages after seeing what I saw today though.
The Official Guide being easier is just something that I had heard on here. People sort of equalized it to the question packs, which are supposed to be a smudge easier than the real exam. Maybe somebody who has taken the test has some more insight.
I agree with the more intense experimental interpretation. I think a key skill is looking at a particularly convoluted experiment and telling yourself "I don't have to understand all of this, I just need to sift through the information to find what I need to answer the question". Not pushing the FREAK OUT button is important.
Btw how have you been approaching CARS? I feel like it's by far my most inconsistent section, and I just can't find my groove. I usually just highlight stuff, but that weird highlighting function kinda threw me off today.
I think my next best resort is TBR bio II. Any feedback from anybody that's used it? Did you go through all the chapters or just the metabolic ones?
Also, I know I've asked this multiple times but I've gotten mixed answers - is everyone memorizing the structure of all the molecules in the metabolic pathways? The name, enzyme, energy input/output, etc. for sure for each pathway along with the structure of major and common macromolecules, but is everyone else memorizing all the intermediate structures as well? (I've gotten yes's from people and we didn't even have to do that in college.. o.o)
That's a little re-assuring, thank you. Are you using the old TBR bio or did you purchase the 2015 version? Do you know if there's a significant difference?Don't take this as a "tip", because I'm pretty nervous about Biochem too, but I'm working through the KA Biomolecules and Cells sections and digging in with TBR BioII. I've also turned to Lehninger when things seem confusing. Then I'll do the TBR questions when I get to the end of each section. It's rigorous and it feels like I'm taking too much time, but the feedback said it was good prep. As for memorizing structures, I really don't know. AAs: yes. All of the side chains. Glycolysis: I'm hoping to be able to recognize the structures for the rate-limiting steps. Krebs: we had to memorize every structure in my biochem class but holy heck I'd rather not spend time on it and just know Acetyl CoA and OAA. If you hear anything else about knowing intermediates, let me know!![]()