**The Official July 2015 MCAT Thread**

This forum made possible through the generous support of SDN members, donors, and sponsors. Thank you.

Medaholic Dr

Houston, we've a problem !
10+ Year Member
Joined
May 31, 2013
Messages
97
Reaction score
37
Hello Forum,
This is the official thread I've created for all the July test takers. I know its kinda early to start preparing for the July MCAT, but I know some who may have already begun the marathon since the new MCAT requires more than 3 months of study prep. Let's fill the thread with rich MCAT related discussions and be helpful to one another. The white coat down the lane is awaiting us ! Let's go....
 
Thanks catie_jane, hoping that's the case!
My impressions:
Overall, the passages were longer than he aamc fl. Hardest section was psychology/sociology. The experiments in psych/soc- way way longer than aamc fl. I finished the fl with 25-30 minutes to spare but finished with only 1-2 minutes on the real thing. Of course, my experience with psych/soc could have just been the drain on my brain (lol) since everything else was significantly longer than the fl. Also, I thought the answer choices in psych/soc, even the ones that were simple recall, and including the passage based ones, had a higher tendency of Questions where you get stuck between two answer choices than the fl. Everything else was about the same (a little harder though) in my opinion than the fl, but not by much. Sorry for the typos, typing from android phone and mentally drained with an empty stomach!
 
I thought the Phys/Chem was a lot harder than the practice test. Super Chem heavy and had some hard experiment question. The CARS passages were long but I didnt think they were too hard. The B/B section was difficult to follow and had almost no body system questions (unfortunately since that is what I focused on this past week). Psy/Soc I didnt think was too bad, maybe slightly harder than the AAMC FL practice exam.

Overall I think it was definitely more difficult than the AAMC FL practice test
 
Did anyone think that the verbal was more like ek 101 or TPRH verbal? Ive been doing well on EK 101 but it just seems too easy. TPRH verbal is kicking my ass. Any thoughts would be appreciated.
 
Well I was on reddit and found out that some girl had a panic attack and passed out in the bathroom and had to be transported... so based on that I think you guys are all in pretty good shape in comparison :banana:(<---- always wanted to use this one)
 
My computer ended up freezing in the middle of CARS haha I freaked for a second. I looked around to see if it was just me or other people as well and it was only me so I got moved to a different computer. Didn't void the test, but MAN did I make some dumb mistakes in B/B. Otherwise nothing was out of the ordinary.

But I will say if you run into uncommon psych/socio terms DO NOT panic. I review notecards with over 350-400 terms and there were terms I had never even seen. Make the best possible educated guess, mark it, move on and come back if you have time. Remember each question is worth the same.
 
I found the exam challenging, but fair. I was pleased with my performance on bio/biochem, but felt I should have prepared a little more for psych/soci. Chem/physics and CARS were reasonable - both comparable to the AAMC practice test.

I reviewed amino acids and michaelis-menton kinetics yesterday - and for that I was very grateful. Know your amino acids cold.

C/P & BIO sections were maxed out on biochem. A few (very specific) biomolecules came up on the test that I wasn't prepared for. The fine, intricate details of human metabolism will show up. Do. not. neglect. these. topics. I wish I had spent more time studying biochem, but it just wasn't possible working full-time.

I primarily used TPR and EK to prepare. I was pleased with both, however I did prefer TPR to EK. EK has better graphics but PR asks more questions throughout the text - allowing you to pinpoint your strengths/weaknesses quickly. I did not take a course. I watched a good # of the khan academy videos; some were better than others - they reinforce topics over and over and OVER again - this makes me impatient sometimes. I much prefer to read a textbook at my own pace. I also had an organic and biochem textbook that i would refer to if a topic was still unclear.

I made a pretty sick chart of amino acids. I definitely spent WAY too much time formatting it. I am happy to share if anyone is interested.
 
Chem/Physics: never been my greatest section and it sure wasnt today. Had two physics passages that kicked my ass. I had horrible time management on this section so thats that lol.
CARS: felt really good. usually my best section and I think it was pretty fair. i think the aamc question packs and practice test were a good representative.
Bio: i think the practice test was also similar to this. I expected it to be worse tbh.
Psych/Socio: I didnt think it was that bad tbh. There was probably one or two terms i NEVER saw before but I didnt think it was that bad.
Overall: Im hoping my chem/physics section didnt kill me. Especially after coming on here and seeing that everyone else thought it was easy lol. But im happy to be done!
Good luck to everyone tomorrow. As someone who was freaking out the night before, i can honestly say the nerves go away after the Chem/Physics section so dont worry and do your best!!
 
I found the exam challenging, but fair. I was pleased with my performance on bio/biochem, but felt I should have prepared a little more for psych/soci. Chem/physics and CARS were reasonable - both comparable to the AAMC practice test.

I reviewed amino acids and michaelis-menton kinetics yesterday - and for that I was very grateful. Know your amino acids cold.

C/P & BIO sections were maxed out on biochem. A few (very specific) biomolecules came up on the test that I wasn't prepared for. The fine, intricate details of human metabolism will show up. Do. not. neglect. these. topics. I wish I had spent more time studying biochem, but it just wasn't possible working full-time.

I primarily used TPR and EK to prepare. I was pleased with both, however I did prefer TPR to EK. EK has better graphics but PR asks more questions throughout the text - allowing you to pinpoint your strengths/weaknesses quickly. I did not take a course. I watched a good # of the khan academy videos; some were better than others - they reinforce topics over and over and OVER again - this makes me impatient sometimes. I much prefer to read a textbook at my own pace. I also had an organic and biochem textbook that i would refer to if a topic was still unclear.

I made a pretty sick chart of amino acids. I definitely spent WAY too much time formatting it. I am happy to share if anyone is interested.
Hey, I would be interested in the char if you wouldn't mind sharing. Thanks!
 
So I iust finished the test and god, the CARS and Psy is way harder than I expected. Every passage on the cars session was at least 7 sentences long, which really messed up my timing. As for the Psy section, expect a lot of weird and unfamiliar terms.

The chem/physics portion was probably the easiest, while the bio section was okay. Anyway, most of the people I talked to after the exam agreed that the AAMC FL is not even close to the actual exam, not even close!!

Good luck to you guys tomorrow!
 
So I iust finished the test and god, the CARS and Psy is way harder than I expected. Every passage on the cars session was at least 7 sentences long, which really messed up my timing. As for the Psy section, expect a lot of weird and unfamiliar terms.

The chem/physics portion was probably the easiest, while the bio section was okay. Anyway, most of the people I talked to after the exam agreed that the AAMC FL is not even close to the actual exam, not even close!!

Good luck to you guys tomorrow!
Ugh agreed on cars!
 
Does anyone have access to a TPR psychology database? I kniw it's a long shot, but I used Kaplan and based on what I've read, TPR people felt a lot more comfortable with the terminology.
 
DONE DONE AND DONE! C/P was aighttt. I found bio to be more difficult than I was expecting.. but Psych was like a breeze so it was a good way to end 🙂 Became good friends with the Prometric proctor as well 😛 SO done with this antisocial life tho. Good luck to Saturday test takers!
 
Guys, how would you recommend the other test takers in aug & sept to prepare for the potential "longer" passages in CARS? I'm noticing that a lot of people are saying it really messed up their timing... I'm the type of person that start going into panic mode if my timing is not on par with my practice haha. Is there anything else we can do than to just.... read faster? lol
 
Guys, how would you recommend the other test takers in aug & sept to prepare for the potential "longer" passages in CARS? I'm noticing that a lot of people are saying it really messed up their timing... I'm the type of person that start going into panic mode if my timing is not on par with my practice haha. Is there anything else we can do than to just.... read faster? lol

Probably not. LOL. Hate to be pessimistic...but with CARS..pace can only be related to 2 things. A) Length of passage/reading speed and B) Answering questions...so you can either read faster, or answer the questions faster. I'm not sure which one is better at this point...read faster = possibly reduced comprehension....answer questions faster = more prone to mistakes. Sigh...
 
Guys, how would you recommend the other test takers in aug & sept to prepare for the potential "longer" passages in CARS? I'm noticing that a lot of people are saying it really messed up their timing... I'm the type of person that start going into panic mode if my timing is not on par with my practice haha. Is there anything else we can do than to just.... read faster? lol

You could always use the same passages but just give yourself less time to complete them. Same ratio of length:time
 
Probably not. LOL. Hate to be pessimistic...but with CARS..pace can only be related to 2 things. A) Length of passage/reading speed and B) Answering questions...so you can either read faster, or answer the questions faster. I'm not sure which one is better at this point...read faster = possibly reduced comprehension....answer questions faster = more prone to mistakes. Sigh...

Yeah i feel that... I tried reading faster today on my CARs practice, and my score went down significantly... I feel better taking my time to understand the passage and spend less time on the question
 
I think you and I had the same version ^



I definitely had a different exam. My P/S was a joke. like easier than the AAMC FL. There were only 3-4 terms I wasn't familiar with, everything else was in TPR.

My Chem/Phys was absolutely killer. Its usually my weakest section anyways, but this was slightly harder than AAMC FL. I'm thinking no possibility of higher than 128 and I'll be lucky to get 127.

CARS I really have no idea. Didn't have much leisure time to check really anything. Harder than AAMC FL but probably on par with other companies. Not even close to Q-PACK. I'll just have to wait and see

B/BC started freaking hard but got ridiculously easy towards the end. I never have a lot of leftover time but today I did. I went back to the hard ones and felt more confident as I confirmed answers and caught obvious errors.

P/S like I said was cake. I'm feeling confident about a 129. Maybe even 130 is I didn't make any stupid mistakes

My best guesses would be
C/P 126-127
B/BC 127-128
CARS 126-128
P/S 128-130

Basically thank god there is a P/S on this new MCAT to make up for any poor scores in the rest.


We definitely had the same test. This is exactly how I think it went for me as well.
 
Just saying guys.. I wouldn't let one person stop you from going over equations and the concepts behind them. I remember using multiple equations in C/P for various types of questions. Sorry to burst your bubble, but don't be surprised if you have to use an equation lol.
 
July 17th and July 18th will be different tests. If you are taking it tomorrow, do not try compare it. Trust me, it will just make you more nervous. I remember a friend in real life said this happened to him and his exam ended up having opposite trends meaning the BS section for his test was tough (still had a 90+% percentile score, he felt he scored a few points lower than he ended up scoring) while the PS section was tough for the day before on the old MCAT.
 
What does that even mean? Surely, you used at least 1 equation during the entire exam?

i agree with that poster myself. there were only two equations i can think of that i had to know by memory for the chem/physics section and one of them could've been easily derived from the passage....so really, i only needed to memorize a single physics equation for that section, iirc. still, i recommend understanding physics and being comfortable with all the topics listed, but i wouldn't stress over it. it was the most straight-forward topic (for my test today, at least...and in my opinion, for what that's worth).

i honestly am blanking on any gen chem equations i could've used...i feel like there weren't really any....

tl;dr not much of an emphasis on rote memorization of equations. very strong emphasis on conceptual understanding, though
 
Well the anxiety I think has finally sank in.... getting this feeling that I know ABSOLUTELY NOTHING.

Really going to use the tutorial section as much as I can to get myself hyped up and prepared for the first C/P passage. I find that I write down almost a page worth of info, equations, AA mneumonics and rarely end up using it, but it puts me in a good mood because I feel like my brain starts getting in the "MCAT" mode.

Best of luck to everyone taking it with me tomorrow!!
 
July 17th and July 18th will be different tests. If you are taking it tomorrow, do not try compare it. Trust me, it will just make you more nervous. I remember a friend in real life said this happened to him and his exam ended up having opposite trends meaning the BS section for his test was tough (still had a 90+% percentile score, he felt he scored a few points lower than he ended up scoring) while the PS section was tough for the day before on the old MCAT.

Yeah, you can even see differences in the tests between people who took it yesterday, so I doubt ours will resemble any version that was given yesterday
 
Well the anxiety I think has finally sank in.... getting this feeling that I know ABSOLUTELY NOTHING.

Really going to use the tutorial section as much as I can to get myself hyped up and prepared for the first C/P passage. I find that I write down almost a page worth of info, equations, AA mneumonics and rarely end up using it, but it puts me in a good mood because I feel like my brain starts getting in the "MCAT" mode.

Best of luck to everyone taking it with me tomorrow!!

Yeah I've been trying to ignore that feeling all day, it's really tough! Anyways we have done what we can and it's time to finally get this thing done. Keep your confidence up and use all your brain power to focus on the test and don't panic... Really hope I can take my own advice.

Good luck tomorrow everyone!
 
Psych social was hard in that you could narrow it down to two answers most of the time, but deciding between those two was really difficult. This is why I stress the concept part because I think that you have to identify what psychological/sociological theory they are talking about and reason to yourself which answer is more relevant to that theory. I am kind of frustrated with the way every portrayed the psych section because my experience was pretty straight forward. It was the fl practice on steroids. That's to be expected. It's not that the full length isn't representive, but it expects you to try harder to solidly what you've learned/

For those lurking here to see what you need to do, I highly recommended the PR. There tests are hard as S*** and taking your time going over them is very fruitful. Personally, I thought that The Next Step exams were really helpful. I took exams 1-3 and that were also very hard, but utilized data interpretation like a mofo. Lastly, I took EK exam 4 and the psych social was literally on point with the exam I took.

As far as chem/phys, it's really about grasping the passage enough to use your foundational information in both disciplines. Like, there were passages that I read where I was like wth is this, but then question stems were basically asking you easy questions in a very tricky way. At least for me, I probably did like 5-6 calculations in total, but most of the time it was basically testing your recall knowledge conceptually. Oh and yes, like everyone has said, know your AA's inside and out. Nomenclature as well as how they reactive in enzymatic processes/ physiological states.

Bio/biochem - again, AA are crucial. But, just like the p\c section, if you can grasp the idea of the convoluted passage, you can pretty much break down the question stems. I mean, data interpretation were def there, but it wasn't something I sat back and was like "wth are you asking me right now???"

As I stated before, I suck at CARS, so my evaluation of that is unfair to most of you, but the passages are definitely longer. Perhaps not as difficult as what we've seen in other prep companies but I'd say it was just a tad bit harder than the full length and the passages are longer. It's really more of an endurance thing.

I d k guys, I personally felt like I was prepared. I can attribute that to TPR. The prep was so hard that it made the exam wen easier. Moreover, know your concepts, be able to read and understand your CARS passages in 10 min tops, and take your psych prep to a whole new level. With that, you will be okay.
 
Psych social was hard in that you could narrow it down to two answers most of the time, but deciding between those two was really difficult. This is why I stress the concept part because I think that you have to identify what psychological/sociological theory they are talking about and reason to yourself which answer is more relevant to that theory. I am kind of frustrated with the way every portrayed the psych section because my experience was pretty straight forward. It was the fl practice on steroids. That's to be expected. It's not that the full length isn't representive, but it expects you to try harder to solidly what you've learned/

For those lurking here to see what you need to do, I highly recommended the PR. There tests are hard as S*** and taking your time going over them is very fruitful. Personally, I thought that The Next Step exams were really helpful. I took exams 1-3 and that were also very hard, but utilized data interpretation like a mofo. Lastly, I took EK exam 4 and the psych social was literally on point with the exam I took.

As far as chem/phys, it's really about grasping the passage enough to use your foundational information in both disciplines. Like, there were passages that I read where I was like wth is this, but then question stems were basically asking you easy questions in a very tricky way. At least for me, I probably did like 5-6 calculations in total, but most of the time it was basically testing your recall knowledge conceptually. Oh and yes, like everyone has said, know your AA's inside and out. Nomenclature as well as how they reactive in enzymatic processes/ physiological states.

Bio/biochem - again, AA are crucial. But, just like the p\c section, if you can grasp the idea of the convoluted passage, you can pretty much break down the question stems. I mean, data interpretation were def there, but it wasn't something I sat back and was like "wth are you asking me right now???"

As I stated before, I suck at CARS, so my evaluation of that is unfair to most of you, but the passages are definitely longer. Perhaps not as difficult as what we've seen in other prep companies but I'd say it was just a tad bit harder than the full length and the passages are longer. It's really more of an endurance thing.

I d k guys, I personally felt like I was prepared. I can attribute that to TPR. The prep was so hard that it made the exam wen easier. Moreover, know your concepts, be able to read and understand your CARS passages in 10 min tops, and take your psych prep to a whole new level. With that, you will be okay.

I also prepped with TPR (content books, exams) and supplemented with AAMC material and GS FL. Using TPR was definitely not a confident booster in any way but I think it definitely prepared me to do much better on the AAMC FL and their question packs then I was ever preparing to.

I hope this carries over to the real deal as well.
 
Thanks all test takers today for getting on here with your great advice for everyone tomorrow and may the MCAT gods be in your favor.
For everyone tomorrow lets slay this animal!!! Best of luck to everyone tomorrow. I believe in you!
 
I found the exam challenging, but fair. I was pleased with my performance on bio/biochem, but felt I should have prepared a little more for psych/soci. Chem/physics and CARS were reasonable - both comparable to the AAMC practice test.

I reviewed amino acids and michaelis-menton kinetics yesterday - and for that I was very grateful. Know your amino acids cold.

C/P & BIO sections were maxed out on biochem. A few (very specific) biomolecules came up on the test that I wasn't prepared for. The fine, intricate details of human metabolism will show up. Do. not. neglect. these. topics. I wish I had spent more time studying biochem, but it just wasn't possible working full-time.

I primarily used TPR and EK to prepare. I was pleased with both, however I did prefer TPR to EK. EK has better graphics but PR asks more questions throughout the text - allowing you to pinpoint your strengths/weaknesses quickly. I did not take a course. I watched a good # of the khan academy videos; some were better than others - they reinforce topics over and over and OVER again - this makes me impatient sometimes. I much prefer to read a textbook at my own pace. I also had an organic and biochem textbook that i would refer to if a topic was still unclear.

I made a pretty sick chart of amino acids. I definitely spent WAY too much time formatting it. I am happy to share if anyone is interested.
Could you please share with me ?
 
I didn't think it was too bad. All of the sections were slightly harder than the AAMC FL, but not a big deal.

For those of you who are taking the test tomorrow, there's nothing you can do now in terms of studying. The biggest favor you can do for yourself is to get your mental game on point. Treat yourself well, relax, and have confidence that you can do it. Soon it will be behind you. Good luck!

For people who are still studying for some future test date, here is my advice: I doubt it matters much which prep company you go with. Give yourself enough time to go over all the material and, if you can, make yourself a deck of Anki flashcards to keep the material fresh. The content is not the hard part. Do practice tests. Just do a bunch of them in the last few weeks before your test, after you finish your content review. Do the full 7 hour experience with just the official breaks in between. Get used to what it feels like to be taking the test, even if the difficulty level and content isn't quite the same as the real thing.
 
Fml. Network went down, waited for them to fix the problem. Never got fixed. Now I have to retake... Was in middle of bio too...
I can do you one better. We had a blackout in the middle of CARS, fml

It happened to cutoff with 5 min left for me, so I definitely got to practice my speed reading skills haha
 
i agree with that poster myself. there were only two equations i can think of that i had to know by memory for the chem/physics section and one of them could've been easily derived from the passage....so really, i only needed to memorize a single physics equation for that section, iirc. still, i recommend understanding physics and being comfortable with all the topics listed, but i wouldn't stress over it. it was the most straight-forward topic (for my test today, at least...and in my opinion, for what that's worth).

i honestly am blanking on any gen chem equations i could've used...i feel like there weren't really any....

tl;dr not much of an emphasis on rote memorization of equations. very strong emphasis on conceptual understanding, though

agreed. My C/P was very conceptual. There weren't any crazy equations I remember having to use or much of any calculations. Just basic stuff you would never forget.
 
can you spend however long you want before clicking "next"? I liked the idea of writing a **** ton of stuff down before hand and i was just wondering if you could just take a longer time even after your time for the tutorial has run out. Same with the breaks, can you just sit there before clicking next even after your break has finished?
 
can you spend however long you want before clicking "next"? I liked the idea of writing a **** ton of stuff down before hand and i was just wondering if you could just take a longer time even after your time for the tutorial has run out. Same with the breaks, can you just sit there before clicking next even after your break has finished?
I asked my proctor this and she said the computer just goes on running down the next section even if you're not back.
 
Last edited:
Advice for CARS - my passages at least were way longer than the aamc fl. Difficulty of the questions and passages wasn't too bad, but the passages themselves were definitely much longer than the fl. Like I said, all the passages in general were longer on my test, but this was especially prominent in CARS.
 
Advice for CARS - my passages at least were way longer than the aamc fl. Difficulty of the questions and passages wasn't too bad, but the passages themselves were definitely much longer than the fl. Like I said, all the passages in general were longer on my test, but this was especially prominent in CARS.
They were the same way on mine as well. Definitely made timing an issue on the exam
 
did anyone think that the ek 2015 - 30 min exams were on par with what you saw? A lot of them are research based passages, and I was just wondering if this was representative.
 
I found the exam challenging, but fair. I was pleased with my performance on bio/biochem, but felt I should have prepared a little more for psych/soci. Chem/physics and CARS were reasonable - both comparable to the AAMC practice test.

I reviewed amino acids and michaelis-menton kinetics yesterday - and for that I was very grateful. Know your amino acids cold.

C/P & BIO sections were maxed out on biochem. A few (very specific) biomolecules came up on the test that I wasn't prepared for. The fine, intricate details of human metabolism will show up. Do. not. neglect. these. topics. I wish I had spent more time studying biochem, but it just wasn't possible working full-time.

I primarily used TPR and EK to prepare. I was pleased with both, however I did prefer TPR to EK. EK has better graphics but PR asks more questions throughout the text - allowing you to pinpoint your strengths/weaknesses quickly. I did not take a course. I watched a good # of the khan academy videos; some were better than others - they reinforce topics over and over and OVER again - this makes me impatient sometimes. I much prefer to read a textbook at my own pace. I also had an organic and biochem textbook that i would refer to if a topic was still unclear.

I made a pretty sick chart of amino acids. I definitely spent WAY too much time formatting it. I am happy to share if anyone is interested.

Can you please share this with me? Thank you so much in advance!
 
Top