I really dont want to talk about this! You sound a lot like, internal member raking information!
1. Very little eye contact. (Lost my interest in about first 10 seconds of the interview)
2. 2 Interview forms, that change depending on response, for a total of 3 forms. (Quote me if I am wrong) This leads to discrepancy in summation of responses. It is known that every one of your answers is ranked on a scale, your style, technique, mannerism, and of course the answers you provide are geared towards a scale. One could make the argument that because there are two different forms present to cater to your particular personality, however how can a few questions (3-2) questions delineate that? Therefore some candidates may score poorly depending on the form they got, if their personality is somehow unrelated to the form. (This could be either or)
3. The forms originated from standardized school wide forms. Because the dental questions were not dental in nature. a. 16 year old girl ethical question. b. Failing restorations questions. Those two questions I am concerned to how they were graded, because they show a clear path of relationships the school wants to uphold.
for question a. If you say you dont tell the parents, you save your relationship with newest memeber of the familly that chose your office for years. Therefore if that individual gets married or has children and does not move away. You can facilitate a stronger relationship.
If you say, "yes the parents must know", you break the relationship, your practice suffers, yet you cover your r-end off any serious litigation, torts, and liabilities present in misdiagnosing individuals presenting to you with dental emergencies. I am 100% sure that is the answer the school looked for. Simply because gingival inflammation and pregnancy likes to go hand in hand, and does have to do with premature birth. Say you have a PA of that region, and parents ask why did you take an extra film, and you would not get out of that without lying about pregnancy. Unless the parents have low dental IQ and simply dont care why you take diagnostic films on their child in places other wise unusual to a periodic examination. Why, make this question appear? I dont understand.
The other question b. Are you willing to replace restorations? Well, the first thing that comes to mind, what kind of restorations, location, age, materials, none of that is provided. They could say at least what kind of restorations, but not the interviewer shook his shoulders and his hands in disapproval. Im not trying to be rude or anything. But if you answer yes, you are then a dental rapist (put your O2 mask on) and start the show involved with removing amalgam fillings which is bad with sound restorations, or simply because there are old, leaking, breaking down, fracturing, restorations/teeth you want to replace you can be considered good. Also replacing poorly done 1/2 done, root canals, and secondary decay is excellent. But you dont know that because you are not told what the restoration is about. So you must assume its not a 1 month old restoration, just placed with no filler/liner in it.
Some dentists will find the work of others to be very poor, but sometimes all those restorations old, and maybe a little tarnished/eroded/corroded. All of a sudden need to pop out one by one, not broken but need fixin. With no evidence of overhangs, marginal problems, or fracture lines, how can you justify fixing something not broken?
Lets look for anecdotal 1980's air pockets, and retention groves, and perfectly scalloped enamel, and if yaw cant find them, then argh matey, double o.o's, yar filling is out of there argh! All done in accordance of standard of care. lol
4. Worst thing is that, the whole atmosphere of, "we dont care who you are", so "hurry up, get out the door", and were tired to see you. Is awesome! Just the expressions on interviewers faces, were awesome. Well at least they were honest, and it wasn't where we dont like you but we will smile anyway, because we have to. That, could be perception.
Speaking of perceptions, those silly questions, " how do you recognize some one", or was it "how do you perceive individuals feelings"... how they act, or whats on their mind. Another wierd repertoire question. Because most dental emergencies involve people bringing themselves (their dental fears, emotional vulnerabilities, past experiences, household fights, addictions) to the dental office way before you ever realize. Most emergencies happen not because you did something wrong. So how is that even dental question?
Also, who you get out of two sets of two, might hold the way you spend your next four years, inst that fair?
After a series of those questions, and lack of eye contact, and tiredness of interviewers, I felt kind of sorry, and did not want to talk about my life, school, or past experiences, just because felt like they did not care, so what was the point? Like everyone wanted to get out of there both them and me. lol