- Joined
- Jun 24, 2015
- Messages
- 203
- Reaction score
- 59
- Points
- 4,726
- Pre-Veterinary


I think patience is an important one.. It's really hard to work with vets who are impatient with coworkers and clients.
Whoa what a thread. I think my number one thing I hate to see my mentors do is fail to take into account what the clients are saying. I can't tell you how often I have worked with vets who fail to believe clients.
Another pet peeve is I once worked for a vet who put down a healthy dog because the sibling had cancer and the owner decided the dog couldn't live alone. And the dogs weren't even particularly bonded. (Which I know because one of the techs lived next door to the owner).
Le sigh.
I think being dismissive is a particularly bad quality. If a tech or a student or a client have a question, please answer them. Don't act dismissive or act like they are stupid.
Also, there is a vet I work with is extremely inefficient and slow. She is constantly 45 minutes behind every day. She doesn't keep things moving and it slows down the whole practice and clients get mad for having to wait for so damn long.
smart alec in me: 3/4 water, 1/4 cells and minerals.
Honestly, the biggest issue I think vets have is not keeping an open mind. With regards to their own staff, new research, owner concerns, etc. I've also seen some pretty crappy leaders as vets. Unfortunately, you need some leadership qualities because you do have to ask for help from colleagues, ask your staff to do things for you, and lead owners and their thought processes to a certain extent.
I think I definitely need to develop better leadership skills. A good leader is so awesome to have. Do you have any recommendations for how to develop that?smart alec in me: 3/4 water, 1/4 cells and minerals.
Honestly, the biggest issue I think vets have is not keeping an open mind. With regards to their own staff, new research, owner concerns, etc. I've also seen some pretty crappy leaders as vets. Unfortunately, you need some leadership qualities because you do have to ask for help from colleagues, ask your staff to do things for you, and lead owners and their thought processes to a certain extent.
Yep. A lack of leadership skills will make a very ineffective vet. Not necessarily a BAD vet, but an ineffective one is almost as problematic. Being comfortable in a leadership role is unfortunately not something that vet schools emphasize enough IMO.
I don't think that's a black and white situation. If it was the owner's request, the owner is the one you should be taking your moral pet peeve up with. Veterinarians often don't get a say in this. Plus owners like that are likely to just go elsewhere and find a vet who will, so that dog was going to die whether your vet did put him down or not.Another pet peeve is I once worked for a vet who put down a healthy dog because the sibling had cancer and the owner decided the dog couldn't live alone. And the dogs weren't even particularly bonded. (Which I know because one of the techs lived next door to the owner).
The vets job is to do what is best for the animal and the client. If that means putting down a healthy animal (rather than, say, having the client take matters into their own hands and shoot it or abandon it somewhere to fend for itself, which are possible alternatives) then that's what the vet does. I'm not saying that all vets will put down a healthy animal or do "convenience euthanasias," but I personally don't judge vets who do. We don't know what the alternative is for that animal and maybe it is the best decision for it.Wow that is so sad. I actually was wondering this today... Do vets have a moral obligation based on their oath or license (?) that they shouldn't put down healthy animals?
I don't think so. I have seen vets refuse to put down animals. Mostly because they were involved on rescue but I don't think we have to euthanize if we think it's wrong.Wow that is so sad. I actually was wondering this today... Do vets have a moral obligation based on their oath or license (?) that they shouldn't put down healthy animals?
I can understand that but however when you don't try to even exhaust other options, I feel like you are not doing your job. The guy was a real piece of work with a history of child abuse so I have to say everyone involved had some blame.I don't think that's a black and white situation. If it was the owner's request, the owner is the one you should be taking your moral pet peeve up with. Veterinarians often don't get a say in this. Plus owners like that are likely to just go elsewhere and find a vet who will, so that dog was going to die whether your vet did put him down or not.
I don't think so. I have seen vets refuse to put down animals. Mostly because they were involved on rescue but I don't think we have to euthanize if we think it's wrong.
I can understand that but however when you don't try to even exhaust other options, I feel like you are not doing your job. The guy was a real piece of work with a history of child abuse so I have to say everyone involved had some blame.
I'm not saying it was black and white. And I understand that some day I will be in the same situation. And yes that guy probably would've shot the dog. But I'm very much into shelter medicine. I just don't think it's fair to the animal. I don't think it was fair they had to live with that guy at all.No, you're right that we don't have to, but there's more to the story than right and wrong.
Yes, her job is to treat animals, but it's also a job and he's a client. Plus, how does she know if she refuses he won't go home and try to kill the dog himself? Especially in the situation you're describing, I don't doubt she may have done the animal a favor.
You will probably be asked about this at vet school interviews and they are looking for students who understand that it's not a black and white or right and wrong situation. So you should think about this some more, and I'm saying this for your own benefit.
I can understand that but however when you don't try to even exhaust other options, I feel like you are not doing your job. The guy was a real piece of work with a history of child abuse so I have to say everyone involved had some blame.
This was also a vet however who on numerous occasions forgot to ketamine cats and would be just about to make an incision.......and the cat would sneeze.
They forgot to sedate the animal. That's all. Lack of attention to detail. Very much because her mental health was definitely not in the right state. She had a lot of things happen in her life right after I met her. And I believe she retired as soon as I left. She stopped doing surgeries the second time she did it because she was appalled at herself.Sorry I am a pretty big newbie, can you explain this to me?
I'm not saying it was black and white. And I understand that some day I will be in the same situation. And yes that guy probably would've shot the dog. But I'm very much into shelter medicine. I just don't think it's fair to the animal. I don't think it was fair they had to live with that guy at all.
I can understand what she did. And it was one of many acceptable answers to a very difficult problem. But I plan to have my own rescue for cases exactly like this. I've already worked with several vets who do the same and it's awe inspiring.
It depends on the situation. It always does. And I just would've liked to see her at least ask him if he had thought about the impact of his decision.
Okay, but rehoming the animal isn't in her job description though. You also posted the story on a thread about bad vets, and my point is that her decision there does not make her a bad vet in the slightest.
I wish you the best with developing that, your cause does sound truly wonderful. I think every animal deserves a home and a happy life, and it sucks that life can't 100% be that way.
With the career we are trying to enter, I know that I have to be prepared for this kind of situation and know that the choices I make may not have a right answer, and I have to choose what's best for the animal, the owner AND myself making a living.
And I wish human med took a more quality of life centered approach to euthanasia. Life centered isn't always good. But if you become a vet, it is your personal choiceTrue enough point. It doesn't make her a bad vet. It was perhaps not the best place to mention it.
But I think it's time the profession embrace a more life centered view on euthanasia.
I worked with a vet who was very smart and a very nice person, her one downfall was she was super timid. Most clients had little confidence in her and some of our pushier staff were able to undermine her (definitely a staff issue there). One time I was holding a puppy for her to vaccinate, the puppy squealed when she touched it with the needle and she jumped about a foot, yet the puppy never moved because I had a good grip. After 3 attempts she handed me the syringe and asked me to do it, but only after she left the room. I vaccinated the puppy by myself, and then it's littermate that belonged to the same owner. She practiced great medicine, but her lack of self confidence was a serious detriment. She was ultimately let go because of that. I honestly wish I could gift her some confidence because that's all she needs to be a fantastic vet.
I should follow this with, she was by no means a BAD vet, she just wasn't a VERY good one. I was one of the few staff that actually liked her and I was also possibly the only staff member that she liked (she wrote me a very nice eLOR).
SO MUCH THIS! I don't understand how it is humane to euthanize an animal with poor QOL and not a human when the route of the word humane is HUMAN. Granted with humans it should be the individual's decision, which could be fairly easy to determine as long as the person outlined it prior to a poor QOL event. If I'm ever in a situation where I will never recover, like an inoperable brain tumor, Huntington's disease or something along those lines, I really hope I can die with dignity rather than suffering. I find it to be such a beautiful thing to assist in ending the suffering of an animal. That said, there are times where I think "convenience euthanasia" (for non-human animals) is also the right/understandable choice.And I wish human med took a more quality of life centered approach to euthanasia. Life centered isn't always good. But if you become a vet, it is your personal choice
Quality of life plays a big part. It's not just keeping the patient alive. I wouldn't keep a dog with severe osteosarcoma alive when they can't walk and the cancer has metastasized if the owners were in agreeance.And I wish human med took a more quality of life centered approach to euthanasia. Life centered isn't always good. But if you become a vet, it is your personal choice
She is at another practice. I'm not sure how she is doing there, but I hope in a different environment she is doing better. I could see how in that particular environment she wasn't allowed to flourish.I can understand that. Do you know if she eventually worked somewhere else? I hope lack of self confidence didn't hold her back for too long 🙁 That can be a terrible thing to deal with, especially in a leadership position.
my grandfather was in an unfortunate situation involving a ventilator and no will to live but he had already been on the ventilator because he didn't have a DNR. It was enough to make me think about it.SO MUCH THIS! I don't understand how it is humane to euthanize an animal with poor QOL and not a human when the route of humane is HUMAN. Granted with humans it should be the individual's decision, which could be fairly easy to determine as long as the person outlined it prior to a poor QOL event. If I'm ever in a situation where I will never recover, like an inoperable brain tumor, Huntington's disease or something along those lines, I really hope I can die with dignity rather than suffering. I find it to be such a beautiful thing to assist in ending the suffering of an animal. That said, there are times where I think "convenience euthanasia" (for non-human animals) is also the right/understandable choice.
I'm truly sorry you and your grandfather had to go through that. From what I've heard from human medical professionals, most of them are on board with ending suffering too, it's just convincing legislation that is the problem.my grandfather was in an unfortunate situation involving a ventilator and no will to live but he had already been on the ventilator because he didn't have a DNR. It was enough to make me think about it.
The thing is...nothing is black and white. Which is why everyone is cautioning you to be wary of passing judgement on these vets.
Vets who don't treat their technicians and support staff with respect, or allow them to work to their fullest potential. Vets who feel it is below them to pitch in and help out with grunt work when there is a need and they are available.
I also hear that biting people is bad too..... rabies? 😛
(I'm in an odd mood tonight, just go with it)

What qualities do you see in vets that are bad for one reason or another?
What basic qualities should someone have that wants to become a veterinarian?
I wouldn't want to say that any particular vet I've worked with is 'bad' because they've all been really intelligent and did practice decent medicine for the most part.
Punting kittens only makes you not a good vet though.Kicking puppies. Definitely a bad habit to have as a vet.
I mean, half the time they're going out of the way to get in the way of your foot, so it's only natural to give them a little punt every now and again.Punting kittens only makes you not a good vet though.
I mean, half the time they're going out of the way to get in the way of your foot, so it's only natural to give them a little punt every now and again.
I mean, half the time they're going out of the way to get in the way of your foot, so it's only natural to give them a little punt every now and again.
