Three Year Medical School ?

This forum made possible through the generous support of SDN members, donors, and sponsors. Thank you.

gnich1914

Full Member
2+ Year Member
Joined
Jun 24, 2019
Messages
25
Reaction score
5
Are any of you guys aware of three year medical school options that don’t require a commitment to a primary care speciality? I am aware of the NYU program but could not find any others that allowed students to apply to (surgery, er, peds etc.)

Members don't see this ad.
 
Columbia and Duke let you skip a research year if you already have a PhD. But that is about t.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 user
Members don't see this ad :)
Thanks for the reply guys! I’m sure you all are pretty busy but if you are able I would love to hear you’re thoughts on Medical School length being shortened. Would Students be missing out on 4th year? Is it necessary at all or just a money grab?
 
Thanks for the reply guys! I’m sure you all are pretty busy but if you are able I would love to hear you’re thoughts on Medical School length being shortened. Would Students be missing out on 4th year? Is it necessary at all or just a money grab?

That’s an interesting question. I wouldn’t call it a straight up “money grab,” but it’s usefulness is debatable (given that medical school at some institutions can be shortened to 3 years).

I think most modern medical education is based on the Flexner report, which came out in 1910. That might be relevant here (I never read the report).

The 4th year might be helpful for people interested in specializing.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 3 users
I hope we see more three-year programs even if they are primary care only.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 users
I have heard horrible things about 3 year programs near me.
From what I’ve gathered, they just seem ridiculously hard and mentally taxing. Fitting all of that information into 3 years.


(note- this was for a BS/MD 6 year program specifically)
 
I think having 4 years is good just for the extra exposure you get to other fields. Some medical students don't make up their mind on a speciality until their 4th year. Choosing a medical speciality can be a daunting and difficult task for a lot of students. I also think that the 4th year of medical school really improves your skills as you have the basics down at that point and can use the 4th year to solidify knowledge, work on stuff you're weaker in, and pursue interests via electives etc.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 users
I have heard horrible things about 3 year programs near me.
From what I’ve gathered, they just seem ridiculously hard and mentally taxing. Fitting all of that information into 3 years.


(note- this was for a BS/MD 6 year program specifically)
Jeez so they're pumping out 24 year old MDs? That's crazy to me

edit: I'm bad at math
 
More accurately IMO, you either choose to do something important in fourth year or you don't. You can choose to do electives and rotations that are valuable to your learning, fill in gaps in your education/knowledge, or relevant to your future specialty, or you can not.

ETA: @ OP, also worth noting that residency apps go out in September, and you need to have at least a general idea of what specialty you want a few months before then. So just from a logistical perspective...if med school was 3 years, people would basically be picking specialties right after Step 1, likely with no actual experience in that specialty and very little if any experience in other specialties as well.

I’m under the impression that this is one of the reasons that the 3 year tracks are mostly geared toward primary care (they are also serving the need for those types of physicians).I am also under the impression that these programs emphasize clinic time and patient interactions and that rotations begin sooner. Step 1 is usually taken sooner as well (by a few weeks).
 
  • Like
Reactions: 2 users
Even taking those things into account, I still feel like you're having to choose a specialty with very little experience with that specialty, and just as importantly very little exposure to anything else that might pique your interest or be a better fit for you. And perhaps I'm a bit biased as someone in a primary care specialty, but I personally think that if you're going into FM, IM, peds, etc. it's even more important that you do get exposure to a broader swath of medicine. Once they're into residency, a dermatologist or orthopedic surgeon is probably not going to use much knowledge from, say, an OBGYN rotation or a cardiology elective. A PCP absolutely would need that exposure to provide better care for their patients. To be a good PCP you need to have at least a working knowledge of the basics of just about every specialty, and I think a 3 year program would significantly reduce that knowledge.

I hear ya. I’m not trying to change the way you feel, just sharing what I know about the early clinical exposure, the earlier rotations and the earlier step 1 that some 3 year programs employ. These programs usually come with huge incentives and are usually in place to serve the community faster so it’s a great stepping stone for some but probably not a good path for others. Also, I don’t think the exposure to other specialties will be reduced by much since they’re still required.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 user
Even taking those things into account, I still feel like you're having to choose a specialty with very little experience with that specialty, and just as importantly very little exposure to anything else that might pique your interest or be a better fit for you. And perhaps I'm a bit biased as someone in a primary care specialty, but I personally think that if you're going into FM, IM, peds, etc. it's even more important that you do get exposure to a broader swath of medicine. Once they're into residency, a dermatologist or orthopedic surgeon is probably not going to use much knowledge from, say, an OBGYN rotation or a cardiology elective. A PCP absolutely would need that exposure to provide better care for their patients. To be a good PCP you need to have at least a working knowledge of the basics of just about every specialty, and I think a 3 year program would significantly reduce that knowledge.
This really doesn’t hold up. You don’t gain your OBGYN experience as a family med doctor from your 6 week rotation in med school. That’s what residency is for. Otherwise FM doctors who trained at foreign medical schools with different rotations than are typical at US schools would lack OB/psych/etc experience due to not having those rotations in med school. That doesn’t seem to be true, and the reason it isn’t is because residency provides you that experience and normalizes everyone’s training.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 users
Top