- Joined
- Oct 18, 2016
- Messages
- 142
- Reaction score
- 52
Is the term "osteopath" insulting here, I seem to have struck a nerve with some of the posters above even though I'm apply almost all osteopathic schools? I always thought osteopath vs allopath is the same as saying osteopathic physician vs allopathic physician
Even if in a sentence you said "the difference between osteopaths and allopaths is..." I can avoid it moving forward, but I used that exact phrase in a secondary essay for a DO school I got an II for
Ps I only want to become a DO so I'm not some outsider looking down on everyone, I thought it was an abbreviated way of talking about the distinctions between DO and MD. If I called everyone a "physician" I wouldn't know how to answer "Why osteopathic medicine?"
Point taken, I was not aware of this historical significance behind the terms. Hopefully Adcoms will not shred me up at my interview, I will certainly not use the term again
You can never tell with Adcom members. While I agree with the above sentiments, I had an OPP faculty interviewer use the term many times during an interviewer. I have also been told on these forums not to answer the "Why DO?" question with "DO treats the whole patient!", but I recently had an interviewer where, after I said everything but that, she replied " So basically DO treats the whole patient?" and she was an MD. You just gotta use common sense.
Osteopath is a term that refers to practitioners of OMM that are not physicians. It's historically used as a derisive term when applied to those of us that also practice mainstream medicine in addition to OMM. Knowing this is important because if you use the term osteopath in an interview, you're 1,000% not getting the spot. We are osteopathic physicians.Even if in a sentence you said "the difference between osteopaths and allopaths is..." I can avoid it moving forward, but I used that exact phrase in a secondary essay for a DO school I got an II for
Ps I only want to become a DO so I'm not some outsider looking down on everyone, I thought it was an abbreviated way of talking about the distinctions between DO and MD. If I called everyone a "physician" I wouldn't know how to answer "Why osteopathic medicine?"
Here's how I see it, as an OMS1.
It all depends how you're using the phrase "osteopath." It's not okay to call a DO physician an "osteopath" to define him or his practice (unless it's a STRICTLY OMM practice, but even then...eh), but from what I've seen, it's okay to call a DO an osteopath when you're talking about their practice of OMM.
When a DO is is ordering lab tests, doing surgery, checking BP, or generally doing "doctor stuff," he's a physician, a doctor, an osteopathic physician, or an internist/neurologist/gynecologist, etc. But when a DO is doing OMM, I don't think its wrong to say that he's acting in his capacity as an osteopath.
I think it's also fair to say that a DO is a "doctor and an osteopath."
I guess a way to put is like this: If someone has a dual degree in Hostage Negotiating and Weasel Hunting, it's kind of a dick move to call him a weasel hunter while he's saving a city from a a terrorist. But calling him a weasel hunter after he's just saved a woman from a 50lb stoat is just telling it like it is.
I know hospital websites that state either "allopath" and "osteopath" when you click on a provider's name. It makes no difference whatsoever.
Can you link?
Correction: as long as you have good and convincing answers.IMO, the most important thing is to practice interviewing with mock interviews or practicing in front of a camera/mirror. As long as you can say "Why DO, why a physician, why XSOM," you should be fine.
Can you link?
Go on any veterans affair hospital and click on their providers. Osteopath, osteopathic physician, same thing. People know what you mean.